What do you think?
Rate this book
Mass Market Paperback
First published January 1, 1919
But the movement of time, because she was consciously passing along the surface of its moments as one by one they were measured off in sound that no longer held for her any time- expanding depth, was intolerably slow. And so shallow, that presently it was tormenting her with the certainty that else. where, far away in some remote region of consciousness, her authentic being was plunged in a timeless reality within which, if only she could discover the way, she might yet rejoin it and feel the barrier between herself and the music drop away. But the way was barred. And the barrier was not like any of the accountable barriers she had known in the past. It was not any abnormal state of tension. It was as if some inexorable force were holding her here on this chill promontory of consciousness, while within the progressive mesh of interwoven sounds dark chasms opened.
The increase of this sense of unfathomable darkness perilously bridged by sound that had, since it was strange to her, the quality of an infernal improvisation, brought, after a time, the fear of some sudden horrible hallucination, or the breakdown, unawares, of those forces whereby she was automatically conforming to the ordinances of the visible world. Once more she raised her eyes to glance, for reassurance, at Michael seated at her side. But before they could reach him, a single flute-phrase, emerging unaccompanied, dropped into her heart.
Oblivious of the continuing music, she repeated in her mind the little phrase that had spread coolness within her, refreshing as sipped water from a spring. A decorative fragment, separable, a mere nothing in the world composition, it had yet come forth in the manner of an independent statement by an intruder awaiting his opportunity and thrusting in, between beat and beat of the larger rhythm, his rapturous message, abrupt and yet serenely confident, like the sudden brief song of a bird after dark; and so clear that it seemed as though, if she should turf; her eyes, she would see it left suspended in the air in front of the orchestra, a small festoon of sound made visible.
No longer a pattern whose development she watched with indifference, the music now assailing her seemed to have borrowed from the rapturous intruder both depth and glow; and confidence in an inaccessible joy. But she knew the change was in herself; that the little parenthesis, coming punctually as she turned to seek help from Michael who could not give it, had attained her because in that movement she had gone part of the way towards the changeless central zone of her being. The little phrase had caught her on the way.
But from within the human atmosphere all about her came the suggestion that this retreat into the centre of her eternal profanity, if indeed she should ever reach it again, was an evasion whose price she would live to regret. Again and again it had filled her memory with wreckage. She admitted the wreckage, but insisted at the same time upon the ultimate departure of regret, the way sooner or later it merged into the joy of a secret companionship restored; a companionship that again and again, setting aside the evidence of common sense, and then the evidence of feeling, had turned her away from entanglements by threatening to depart, and had always brought, after the wrenching and the wreckage, moments of joy that made the intermittent miseries, so rational and so passionate and so brief, a small price to pay.
Schuld und Sühne. German translations are in general very faithful and good, Michael had said. Guilt and Redemption, much more Dostoievski's meaning than Crime and Punishment, suggesting a handbook of jurisprudence.2110 pages later, at the end of this fourth section, the rating I give above is the equivalent of that of the entire piece, rather than this single. I do so somewhat in the interest of fairness, but also to minimize the deflation that comes after spending so much time on a single work regardless of whether it went well or ill, but is certainly exacerbated if the latter ends up being the final judgment. For I came to this chapter sequence looking for an origin point of a particular period/style/kind of writing that I have had an on and off love affair with since the very start of my more serious pursuits into that entity known as literature, and what I found told me much of what I knew of the ideals, but also gave me a rather comprehensive picture of the stodgier, more hateful side of a movement looking to render reality itself in the form of physical print. I've no idea whether these hypotheses have any kind of merit, and the fields of making a living being what they are, there's next to no chance that I would receive any measure of monetary compensation for looking into it more thoroughly than real world circumstances allow for. However, I can at least get some cursory thoughts down here, leaving any potential dialectic to the casual passerby, as well as my own future self.
Whether, when socialism came and every one was a worker, there would be any joy left uncontaminated? [...] She remembered shrinking from the mere spectacle of the family in Barnes who did their own housework and kept their garden in order [...] They enjoyed their outings, a little too obviously and excessively, with the joy of those temporarily set free, never with the rapture of inhabiting unthreatened territory.Much as Henderson writes down what she senses, feels, and experiences over the course of thousands of pages, so too does she increasingly judge all and sundry, resulting in an intimately detailed portrait of that sociological construct of 'habitus' that is interesting to the detached scholar, but not so much to the engaged reader. It's made me think about how other participants of that increasingly retroactively termed 'Modernism' movement contributed to such, as well as what world events and pressures of the changing times could have instigated such reactions. For Henderson is a veritable savant of categorizing along lines of dichotomous gender, class, nationality, religion, accent, mental capacity, and race, and as I described in the previous work, she has a hysterical instinctive reaction to those she deems to be 'other'. Possibly in reaction to the immense quantities of such that informed the previous piece, this final volume is the most imbued with her musings on what 'English' is in terms of behaviors, ethics, spiritual beliefs, and, in instances that increase in prophetic urgency with every repetition, the best way to transcribe language as it engages with the reality in the form of the written word. Combine this with the briefly, and increasingly dismissively, engagements with the broader sociopolitical shifts of the diaspora of the Bolshevik revolution, English women's suffrage, and the onset of WWI with Henderson's beloved Germany, and I have to wonder whether Modernism had its own obsessions with building up an ideological bulwark with a literary, yet ultimately propagandist, output that translated 'stream of consciousness' not out of a sense of communion with others, but in an effort to put out the right form into art while the right form of Anglo supremacism still largely held supreme. I wouldn't throw over the whole field for such, but as was the case with some of the strongest members of Futurism doing all they could to ingratiate themselves with Italian Fascism, I do have to wonder.
On the one hand memories, rare but vivid, of outlying elders who, in thus distinguishing herself and Harriett from the surrounding adults, had inspired only nausea and reaped only contempt, and on the other a sly voice requesting her to note the difference between masculine and feminine contributions, and to admit St Paul justified in forbidding women to give voice in public.As for everything else, there is a real sense of homecoming throughout a great deal of this volume that ultimately originates from the bucolic paradise of Irish Quakers that the main character finds herself a residence of for what seems to be a significant number of years. Meditation on what has become recognizable as the main character's preferences for nature, silent communion with those she instinctively 'gets' (aka, they pass all the tests of her constant appraisal of the potential 'other', plus as a bonus if they are able serve as a mother/father figure), returns to various places and peoples rendered familiar by earlier volumes, the characteristically extremely brief acknowledgements of the more dramatic aspects of life (the marriage of two people within one's social circle and the suicide of another), and rather long and meandering rhapsodies on the 'rightness' of a particular religious sect, but that last is more a consequence of my agnostic atheism than anything else. If one reserved judgment on this volume up until the first 94% had passed in reading, one might well think that it was concluding as best a piece like this can. If one hadn't already gathered from the history of the author's own compositional impetus, that sense is false, but seeing as how the fifth chapter of this volume, the thirteenth of the entire novel sequence, was published posthumously, any potential continuation will be revealed to the public either piecemeal or retrospectively cobbled together by outsiders. Unfortunate, but considering how much I preferred the earlier parts to the latter, it's not something I can honestly say to be too disappointed by.
For I knew he would have described what he dislike by its defects and what he approved of by its qualities, and both very tamely, so that inevitably the editor would 'regret.'This is the end of my Long Read for 2021, and it's left me with as much a sense of fresh insights into long dwelt upon tenets of literature and associated paradigms as with one of satisfaction with my efforts. As per usual, I am unable to join those who unequivocally praise this piece, but I've written too much about such in my own mind to believe myself unfairly swayed by any statements made by certain writers who have proved extremely influential in my development as reader, writer, and human being (Woolf being the most obvious suspect in this regard). After having finished this, I'll be reading the one work of H.G. Wells that I have on hand in a more gossipy mindset than I would have otherwise, as well as revisiting some authors, works, and other material avenues of the 'classics' with some new thoughts to throw around during my perusal (Ward (Mary Augusta for those not in the know), James, Dostoevsky, to name a few). In terms of this work existing in its own right, I'd be interested in reading some of the critical commentary that is supposed to be released to the public in a few years time, but I don't see myself ever rereading it. Such a decision is not exactly unusual when it comes to anything numbering in the multiple thousands of pages, but this is a piece that, ultimately, in certain vital ways, proved itself to be completely the opposite of what I expect to find in literature: to put it plainly, this is not Forster's 'only connect' or the more powerful sections of the written word within which I've discovered myself to be embodied. It's not Richardson's fault that our personal preferences for literature to be at such loggerheads, but it's still rather jarring to read someone who writes out a pure sense of judgmental self satisfaction without having encountered commentary on such previously. So it goes. For now, I am finished, and I leave any and all further thoughts on it to the future. Now, it is time to shift to much shorter pastures, something that I am much in need of as the days of 2021 wind on from the exigencies of 2020.
'We all have different sets of realities.'
'That, believe me, is impossible.'