To flourish and grow in a many sided, uncertain and ever changing world that surrounds us, suggests that we have to make intuitive within ourselves those many practices we need to meet the exigencies of that world. The contents, hence the five sections, that comprise this 'Discourse' unfold observations and ideas that contribute toward achieving or thwarting such an aim or purpose.
Specifically:
'Patterns of Conflict' represents a compendium of ideas and actions for winning and losing in a highly competitive world.
’Organic Design for Command and Control' surfaces the implicit arrangements that permit cooperation in complex, competitive, fast moving situations.
’The Strategic Game of ? and ?' emphasizes the mental twists and turns we undertake to surface appropriate schemes or designs for realizing our aims or purposes.
’Destruction and Creation' lays out in abstract but graphic fashion the ways by which we evolve mental concepts to comprehend and cope with our environment:
'Revelation' makes visible the metaphorical message that flows from this 'Discourse'.
> This is exactly what he did with "The Discourse on Winning and Losing" > > Boyd is one of my favorite examples of a great process modeler and meta-level thinker because he did it at every level of his career: > > Process modelling of why he was such a good fighter-pilot led to EM theory. > > Process modelling of why EM theory worked led to OODA loop. > > Process Modelling of how he kept doing great process modelling (including the OODA loop) led to "Destruction and Creation" and Process modelling of how the OODA loop worked led to "A Discourse on Winning and Losing"
The strategic concepts are fundamental and brilliant. But the book is basically a compilation of Boyd’s slide decks. While interesting, they really need explanation to be more than a smattering of Svengali like ideas.