What do you think?
Rate this book
Tudor: The Family Story
# For 'Best Books about the Tudors: facts behind the Wolf Hall trilogy' the Times of London recommends Tudor: The Family Story
Sunday Times top ten Bestseller; BBC History Book of the Year; a Daily Telegraph Book of the Year; a History Today Book of the Year
The Tudors are England’s most notorious royal family. But, as Leanda de Lisle’s gripping new history reveals, they are a family still more extraordinary than the one we thought we knew.
The Tudor canon typically starts with the Battle of Bosworth in 1485, before speeding on to Henry VIII and the Reformation. But this leaves out the family’s obscure Welsh origins, the ordinary man known as Owen Tudor who would fall (literally) into a Queen’s lap—and later her bed. It passes by the courage of Margaret Beaufort, the pregnant thirteen-year-old girl who would help found the Tudor dynasty, and the childhood and painful exile of her son, the future Henry VII. It ignores the fact that the Tudors were shaped by their past—those parts they wished to remember and those they wished to forget.
By creating a full family portrait set against the background of this past, de Lisle enables us to see the Tudor dynasty in its own terms, and presents new perspectives and revelations on key figures and events. De Lisle discovers a family dominated by remarkable women doing everything possible to secure its future; shows why the princes in the Tower had to vanish; and reexamines the bloodiness of Mary’s reign, Elizabeth’s fraught relationships with her cousins, and the true significance of previously overlooked figures. Throughout the Tudor story, Leanda de Lisle emphasizes the supreme importance of achieving peace and stability in a violent and uncertain world, and of protecting and securing the bloodline.
Tudor is bristling with religious and political intrigue but at heart is a thrilling story of one family’s determined and flamboyant ambition.
Sunday Times top ten Bestseller; BBC History Book of the Year; a Daily Telegraph Book of the Year; a History Today Book of the Year
The Tudors are England’s most notorious royal family. But, as Leanda de Lisle’s gripping new history reveals, they are a family still more extraordinary than the one we thought we knew.
The Tudor canon typically starts with the Battle of Bosworth in 1485, before speeding on to Henry VIII and the Reformation. But this leaves out the family’s obscure Welsh origins, the ordinary man known as Owen Tudor who would fall (literally) into a Queen’s lap—and later her bed. It passes by the courage of Margaret Beaufort, the pregnant thirteen-year-old girl who would help found the Tudor dynasty, and the childhood and painful exile of her son, the future Henry VII. It ignores the fact that the Tudors were shaped by their past—those parts they wished to remember and those they wished to forget.
By creating a full family portrait set against the background of this past, de Lisle enables us to see the Tudor dynasty in its own terms, and presents new perspectives and revelations on key figures and events. De Lisle discovers a family dominated by remarkable women doing everything possible to secure its future; shows why the princes in the Tower had to vanish; and reexamines the bloodiness of Mary’s reign, Elizabeth’s fraught relationships with her cousins, and the true significance of previously overlooked figures. Throughout the Tudor story, Leanda de Lisle emphasizes the supreme importance of achieving peace and stability in a violent and uncertain world, and of protecting and securing the bloodline.
Tudor is bristling with religious and political intrigue but at heart is a thrilling story of one family’s determined and flamboyant ambition.
539 pages, Hardcover
First published October 8, 2013
290 people are currently reading
4588 people want to read
About the author
Leanda de Lisle
15 books344 followersLeanda de Lisle is the author of bestselling Tudor and Stuart history praised for meticulous research as well as strong narratives. She has a Masters degree in history from Oxford University. TUDOR, her biography of the Tudor family 1437-1603, was a top ten Sunday Times best seller, BBC History book of the year, Daily Telegraph book of the year, and History Today book of the year. THE SISTERS WHO WOULD BE QUEEN; THE TRAGEDY OF MARY, KATHERINE AND LADY JANE GREY, was a New York Times best seller and is the inspiration for Phillippa Gregory's 2017 novel THE LAST TUDOR. Her latest book WHITE KING,, a biography of the doomed Charles I, is her most dramatic yet and is the winner of the 2018 Historical Writers Association non-fiction crown.
Leanda does a monthly podcast on itunes Ten Minute Tudors, it uncovers the true Tudors and Stuarts behind the myths.
Leanda does a monthly podcast on itunes Ten Minute Tudors, it uncovers the true Tudors and Stuarts behind the myths.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 228 reviews
May 29, 2015
There have been an awful lot of books, movies, and TV shows about the Tudors. Their cultural impression is larger than life. Events of historic importance certainly occurred during their reigns, probably most significantly the Protestant Reformation, but it is their colorful antics that make them memorable. Even the Plantagenets who preceded them, ruling for 331 years in contrast to a mere 118 for the Tudors, are much less prominent in public consciousness. Somehow the many wild tales of treachery and betrayal that the Plantagenets gave us pale in comparison to the doings of serial groom Henry VIII.
And really, it is Henry VIII who most represents the Tudor dynasty. There were four (and a half?) other Tudor monarchs, but Henry, and to a lesser extent Elizabeth, gets most of the press. (The recent Showtime television series The Tudors lasted four seasons but, despite the plural implied in its name, covered just one Tudor - Henry).
There isn’t much that is new here about Henry and Elizabeth, but where Leanda de Lisle’s contribution to popular Tudor histories stands out is in her treatment of the other lesser known Tudors. The story begins earlier, with events that often get just a cursory mention in Tudor books. Here we have a discussion of Henry VII’s origins, the Wars of the Roses, and the fall of Richard III. De Lisle also addresses the influence of Henry VIII’s grandmother, Margaret Beaufort, and his sisters, whose marriages had important repercussions seen much later in English history. By including these events in detail, there is a historical context for the actions of the Henrys, making some of their decisions more understandable, even if not admirable.
De Lisle also includes an analysis of the “usurpation” of Lady Jane Grey. The “Nine Day Queen” is often little more than a footnote in Tudor histories, but Jane and her sisters are an area of interest for the author, who wrote another book about them. Here she justifies their inclusion by showing how the shakiness of the succession after Edward’s death may have contributed to some of Mary’s, and later Elizabeth’s, paranoia. It seems that none of the Tudors could ever completely avoid anxiety about being ousted.
Leanda de Lisle’s Tudor history is a readable one. She avoids getting bogged down in some of the details of dress, food, and other customs. (For that type of information, Alison Weir is much more complete). Instead, the focus here is on the overarching picture and historical context.
And really, it is Henry VIII who most represents the Tudor dynasty. There were four (and a half?) other Tudor monarchs, but Henry, and to a lesser extent Elizabeth, gets most of the press. (The recent Showtime television series The Tudors lasted four seasons but, despite the plural implied in its name, covered just one Tudor - Henry).
There isn’t much that is new here about Henry and Elizabeth, but where Leanda de Lisle’s contribution to popular Tudor histories stands out is in her treatment of the other lesser known Tudors. The story begins earlier, with events that often get just a cursory mention in Tudor books. Here we have a discussion of Henry VII’s origins, the Wars of the Roses, and the fall of Richard III. De Lisle also addresses the influence of Henry VIII’s grandmother, Margaret Beaufort, and his sisters, whose marriages had important repercussions seen much later in English history. By including these events in detail, there is a historical context for the actions of the Henrys, making some of their decisions more understandable, even if not admirable.
De Lisle also includes an analysis of the “usurpation” of Lady Jane Grey. The “Nine Day Queen” is often little more than a footnote in Tudor histories, but Jane and her sisters are an area of interest for the author, who wrote another book about them. Here she justifies their inclusion by showing how the shakiness of the succession after Edward’s death may have contributed to some of Mary’s, and later Elizabeth’s, paranoia. It seems that none of the Tudors could ever completely avoid anxiety about being ousted.
Leanda de Lisle’s Tudor history is a readable one. She avoids getting bogged down in some of the details of dress, food, and other customs. (For that type of information, Alison Weir is much more complete). Instead, the focus here is on the overarching picture and historical context.
October 22, 2015
'Tudor: The Family Story' begins at the funeral procession of Catherine of Valois in 1437 in order to relate the origins of the Tudor name. Catherine and Owen Tudor's relationship is depicted as truly romantic. I had quite a chuckle or two as Ms. de Lisle showed she has a slightly ribald sense of humor : "There was music playing, and her servants were dancing. While Catherine watched, Owen performed a leap which span out of control, and he fell straight into her lap. As an Elizabethan poet asked, 'Who would not judge it fortune's greatest grace, Since he must fall, to fall in such a place?' " ( 9 )
Ms. de Lisle explains that "'The story of how Henry Tudor [(i.e.Henry VII)] survived against the odds, and won his throne and his bride against even greater odds, is one of the world's great adventure stories.' It sounded irresistible and indeed how could one understand the king if you only began his life in 1485?" (423)
The author approached this family biography that spanned five generations like a top-notch forensic investigator; sifting through layers of archived evidence; exhaustively gathering information; looking at different angles to uncover hidden reasons and perhaps suggest alternate motives - with an acceptable level of plausibility - for the actions of this fascinating royal family. Ms. de Lisle took great care "to examine more closely not how we see the Tudors from our end of the telescope, but how they saw themselves." (424)
I was happy to read more about Margaret Tudor, Queen of Scots, Henry VIII's older sister, whose husband,
James IV, was killed at the battle of Flodden against England while Queen Katherine was regent. It seemed so strange and heartless that Henry VIII would take pleasure in the win, and show little remorse at leaving his pregnant sister a widow, his nephews fatherless, and the three vulnerable in Scotland.
I appreciated that Ms. de Lisle stuck to referring to family members and close surrounding characters by their given names, and did not get heavy handed with lining up their titles like cars in a traffic jam (because as we know titles changed hands as quickly as heads rolled). This is one thing I most dislike - that some medieval historians would plaster titles all over the pages; it isn't impressive at all but is rather ridiculously frustrating. Thankfully, 'Tudor' is not an example of such confusion; it is uncomplicated reading, flowed easily and made sense.
'Tudor' is a work of obvious dedication and passion from an author who has brought to fruition a well balanced biography of a dynasty. It is well written, remarkably researched and rationally thought-out. For medieval history fans, this is not only a pleasurable read on a familiar subject; it also provides new insights and a fresh outlook on a fascinating royal family.
Ms. de Lisle explains that "'The story of how Henry Tudor [(i.e.Henry VII)] survived against the odds, and won his throne and his bride against even greater odds, is one of the world's great adventure stories.' It sounded irresistible and indeed how could one understand the king if you only began his life in 1485?" (423)
The author approached this family biography that spanned five generations like a top-notch forensic investigator; sifting through layers of archived evidence; exhaustively gathering information; looking at different angles to uncover hidden reasons and perhaps suggest alternate motives - with an acceptable level of plausibility - for the actions of this fascinating royal family. Ms. de Lisle took great care "to examine more closely not how we see the Tudors from our end of the telescope, but how they saw themselves." (424)
I was happy to read more about Margaret Tudor, Queen of Scots, Henry VIII's older sister, whose husband,
James IV, was killed at the battle of Flodden against England while Queen Katherine was regent. It seemed so strange and heartless that Henry VIII would take pleasure in the win, and show little remorse at leaving his pregnant sister a widow, his nephews fatherless, and the three vulnerable in Scotland.
I appreciated that Ms. de Lisle stuck to referring to family members and close surrounding characters by their given names, and did not get heavy handed with lining up their titles like cars in a traffic jam (because as we know titles changed hands as quickly as heads rolled). This is one thing I most dislike - that some medieval historians would plaster titles all over the pages; it isn't impressive at all but is rather ridiculously frustrating. Thankfully, 'Tudor' is not an example of such confusion; it is uncomplicated reading, flowed easily and made sense.
'Tudor' is a work of obvious dedication and passion from an author who has brought to fruition a well balanced biography of a dynasty. It is well written, remarkably researched and rationally thought-out. For medieval history fans, this is not only a pleasurable read on a familiar subject; it also provides new insights and a fresh outlook on a fascinating royal family.
September 8, 2014
In her look at the Tudor Dynasty, Ms. De Lisle has delivered a very reader friendly book. Starting with the Owen Tudor, Henry VII’s grandfather and who gave the dynasty its name, the author looks at the family that ruled England from 1485 thru the death of Elizabeth I in 1603. In telling their story Ms. De Lisle states to understand the Tudors, one must understand how they saw themselves.
This is not your standard history. The author just doesn’t look at the politics surrounding the family, but attempts to explain how the politics affected the various members of the family. Starting with Owen Tudor,a commoner, and his very fortuitous marriage to a Queen (Henry V’s widow - Katherine de Valois), the author gives the reader a peak at the interworking’s of the family. In telling the story of Owen and Katherine, Ms. De Lisle recounts the various stories of how they met and how their marriage was received by the ruling council. To say the Regents were not impressed is an understatement, but other than banning them from court, the Council decided not do anything about it until Henry VI came of age and let him deal with it.
Ms De Lisle also does a good job of telling Margret Beaufort’s, the great-granddaughter of John of Gaunt, story. She married Edmund Tudor, one of Owen and Katherine's sons and gave her son his royal blood-tainted though it maybe. She successfully protected her son and navigated the rip tides that were the Wars of Roses and is presented sympathetically contrary to the common perception. She was an astute politician in her own right and was able to judge what needed to be done to protect the interests of her son.
In looking at the Tudor Monarchs, De Lisle does not just tell the story of their reigns, but also looks at them as people. She tells of their fears and their aspirations. She tells how the politics affect their lives as people. In telling Henry VIII’s story she illuminates his desire to emulate and even surpass his predecessor, Henry V and become the King of France and how this affected his foreign policy. She also humanizes the story of his marriage to Katherine of Aragon and how he came to see it as an affront to God and that God was punishing him by not giving him a son. Also in telling the story of Henry VIII, the author tells us the story of his sisters who both married kings and how their decendents came into play in the later stages of the story of the dynasty.
In telling the story of the later Tudors, I felt the author was especially sympathetic to Mary. Her portrayal of Mary was one of a monarch who was an astute judge of what her kingdom would accept in religious matters and only after much urging from Catholic authorities began the persecutions that led he to be known as “Bloody Mary”.
Her sister, Elizabeth, is shown as learning from Mary and to a great extent basing her ruling philosophy on her reign. Ms. De Lisle also notes that Elizabeth had more people executed that either her father or her sister. The author spends a considerable amount of time looking at why Elizabeth would not name a successor, in spite of the urging, almost demanding, of her councilors, esp William Cecil.
All in all this is an excellent look at the family that became the perhaps the greatest of the English Monarchies. I would give it 4.5 stars rounded down for Goodreads.
This is not your standard history. The author just doesn’t look at the politics surrounding the family, but attempts to explain how the politics affected the various members of the family. Starting with Owen Tudor,a commoner, and his very fortuitous marriage to a Queen (Henry V’s widow - Katherine de Valois), the author gives the reader a peak at the interworking’s of the family. In telling the story of Owen and Katherine, Ms. De Lisle recounts the various stories of how they met and how their marriage was received by the ruling council. To say the Regents were not impressed is an understatement, but other than banning them from court, the Council decided not do anything about it until Henry VI came of age and let him deal with it.
Ms De Lisle also does a good job of telling Margret Beaufort’s, the great-granddaughter of John of Gaunt, story. She married Edmund Tudor, one of Owen and Katherine's sons and gave her son his royal blood-tainted though it maybe. She successfully protected her son and navigated the rip tides that were the Wars of Roses and is presented sympathetically contrary to the common perception. She was an astute politician in her own right and was able to judge what needed to be done to protect the interests of her son.
In looking at the Tudor Monarchs, De Lisle does not just tell the story of their reigns, but also looks at them as people. She tells of their fears and their aspirations. She tells how the politics affect their lives as people. In telling Henry VIII’s story she illuminates his desire to emulate and even surpass his predecessor, Henry V and become the King of France and how this affected his foreign policy. She also humanizes the story of his marriage to Katherine of Aragon and how he came to see it as an affront to God and that God was punishing him by not giving him a son. Also in telling the story of Henry VIII, the author tells us the story of his sisters who both married kings and how their decendents came into play in the later stages of the story of the dynasty.
In telling the story of the later Tudors, I felt the author was especially sympathetic to Mary. Her portrayal of Mary was one of a monarch who was an astute judge of what her kingdom would accept in religious matters and only after much urging from Catholic authorities began the persecutions that led he to be known as “Bloody Mary”.
Her sister, Elizabeth, is shown as learning from Mary and to a great extent basing her ruling philosophy on her reign. Ms. De Lisle also notes that Elizabeth had more people executed that either her father or her sister. The author spends a considerable amount of time looking at why Elizabeth would not name a successor, in spite of the urging, almost demanding, of her councilors, esp William Cecil.
All in all this is an excellent look at the family that became the perhaps the greatest of the English Monarchies. I would give it 4.5 stars rounded down for Goodreads.
February 4, 2020
An interesting book which takes the approach of going back to the earlier characters in the story of the Tudor family, starting with Owen Tudor who married the widowed Queen of France after a wild dance leap landed him in her lap! The book goes through each of the personnel, giving a good insight especially into the women who usually are background characters such as Margaret Beaufort, mother of Henry VII, and Margaret Douglas, daughter of Henry VIII's eldest sister and her second husband the Earl of Angus. The part played by such women in the great events of the period is examined, as well as the more usual emphasis on Henry VIII and his treatment of his wives.
There were some interesting insights such as the parallels in character between Henry VIII and his maternal grandfather, Edward IV. The examination of the life of Queen Elizabeth I was also interesting as the author doesn't romanticise her, but gives the warts and all portrayal. There is also somewhat of a rehabilitation of her elder sister Mary and an examination of how the stereotypes and prejudices against women have played a part in demonising both her and certain other royal women.
The author does however have a tendency at times to reiterate the same point about who people are, but to skim over the date so that we're told something happened in August but it's not clear which year. That and a bit of clunkiness in the prose here and there is why I am awarding this 4 stars rather than 5.
There were some interesting insights such as the parallels in character between Henry VIII and his maternal grandfather, Edward IV. The examination of the life of Queen Elizabeth I was also interesting as the author doesn't romanticise her, but gives the warts and all portrayal. There is also somewhat of a rehabilitation of her elder sister Mary and an examination of how the stereotypes and prejudices against women have played a part in demonising both her and certain other royal women.
The author does however have a tendency at times to reiterate the same point about who people are, but to skim over the date so that we're told something happened in August but it's not clear which year. That and a bit of clunkiness in the prose here and there is why I am awarding this 4 stars rather than 5.
June 23, 2013
Disclaimer: Arc read via Netgalley. Thank you Netgalley, Perseus Books, and Public Affairs Books.
I can hear you asking the question – do we really need another book about the Tudors? Really. Well, I don’t know about need, but I can say this is a very excellent look at the Tudor family. If you were going to buy one book about the Tudor dynasty, this should be it. It’s not that I didn’t like Meyer’s book about the family, but de Lisle is just better.
In part, this is because she actually focuses on the family instead of the big two – Henry VIII and Elizabeth I, who seem to have been the focus since the BBC programs. While much of the book does deal with them, de Lisle makes sure that the rest of the family gets their time in the spot light.
She does from the start of the book. She actually truly looks at the marriage of Katherine de Valois and Owen Tudor. The relationship between not only gets the treatment as in looking at the start of the War of the Roses, but actually looks why Katherine would’ve married him, as well relating some interesting gossip about intimate matters. De Lisle conveys to the reader a sense of who these two often passed over dynasty founders. In particular, she looks at the development of Margaret Beaufort and the impact that she might have had on her son Henry VII, who gets far more attention paid to him here than in most other general histories.
And that really is the selling point of this book - the look at the players who are eclipsed by the wives and rivals queens. When I read this, I came away with a far greater understanding of Henry VII instead just simply seeing him as a stringy bastard as he is so often simply drawn. The lives of Edward VI and Mary I are seen in greater detail here as well as their impact in terms of the monarchy. In fact, de Lisle considers the impact of Mary’s rule on how Elizabeth determined to govern and even to act the part of ruler, in more than terms of just religion. She also raises the question of how Elizabeth’s reign would have been seen if she had died early on, when she was sick with smallpox.
This isn’t to suggest that de Lisle focus just on the political. Her description of battle, in particular of Bosworth, is quite frankly very gripping. It is this style, part academic and part almost novelistic in approach that make the book accessible to both long time Tudor fans as well as those who are picking this up due to simply the Showtime series. She does not relate gossip, for the most part, and she does take a closer look at oft held myths or commonly repeated stories. Her take on the Princes in the Tower is plausible and her analysis of Richard III’s rule fair. This is not a blow by blow of the Essex rebellion, but a study in how a family gains, holds, and eventually loses power all the while struggling in the political arena. It is not the soap opera of naked flesh that the Showtime series presented. Warts and all, careful study and understanding. A close look at figures and issues that get swept aside in the tart’s version of the wives. It isn’t a romantic view, and for that it is far more engrossing.
The appendices are worth reading because De Lisle looks and debunks certain myths. While the book does tread on some of the area of her previous work, it does not seem as if she is simply repeating the last book. The Grey sisters are dealt with, as they must be, but while doing them the justice they deserve in a study, de Lisle does not let them and her knowledge of them overwhelm the work.
Truly a wonderful study of the Tudors.
I can hear you asking the question – do we really need another book about the Tudors? Really. Well, I don’t know about need, but I can say this is a very excellent look at the Tudor family. If you were going to buy one book about the Tudor dynasty, this should be it. It’s not that I didn’t like Meyer’s book about the family, but de Lisle is just better.
In part, this is because she actually focuses on the family instead of the big two – Henry VIII and Elizabeth I, who seem to have been the focus since the BBC programs. While much of the book does deal with them, de Lisle makes sure that the rest of the family gets their time in the spot light.
She does from the start of the book. She actually truly looks at the marriage of Katherine de Valois and Owen Tudor. The relationship between not only gets the treatment as in looking at the start of the War of the Roses, but actually looks why Katherine would’ve married him, as well relating some interesting gossip about intimate matters. De Lisle conveys to the reader a sense of who these two often passed over dynasty founders. In particular, she looks at the development of Margaret Beaufort and the impact that she might have had on her son Henry VII, who gets far more attention paid to him here than in most other general histories.
And that really is the selling point of this book - the look at the players who are eclipsed by the wives and rivals queens. When I read this, I came away with a far greater understanding of Henry VII instead just simply seeing him as a stringy bastard as he is so often simply drawn. The lives of Edward VI and Mary I are seen in greater detail here as well as their impact in terms of the monarchy. In fact, de Lisle considers the impact of Mary’s rule on how Elizabeth determined to govern and even to act the part of ruler, in more than terms of just religion. She also raises the question of how Elizabeth’s reign would have been seen if she had died early on, when she was sick with smallpox.
This isn’t to suggest that de Lisle focus just on the political. Her description of battle, in particular of Bosworth, is quite frankly very gripping. It is this style, part academic and part almost novelistic in approach that make the book accessible to both long time Tudor fans as well as those who are picking this up due to simply the Showtime series. She does not relate gossip, for the most part, and she does take a closer look at oft held myths or commonly repeated stories. Her take on the Princes in the Tower is plausible and her analysis of Richard III’s rule fair. This is not a blow by blow of the Essex rebellion, but a study in how a family gains, holds, and eventually loses power all the while struggling in the political arena. It is not the soap opera of naked flesh that the Showtime series presented. Warts and all, careful study and understanding. A close look at figures and issues that get swept aside in the tart’s version of the wives. It isn’t a romantic view, and for that it is far more engrossing.
The appendices are worth reading because De Lisle looks and debunks certain myths. While the book does tread on some of the area of her previous work, it does not seem as if she is simply repeating the last book. The Grey sisters are dealt with, as they must be, but while doing them the justice they deserve in a study, de Lisle does not let them and her knowledge of them overwhelm the work.
Truly a wonderful study of the Tudors.
December 28, 2013
For us Tudorphiles, there really isn’t anything we don’t already know about one of history’s most dramatic families. So what’s the point of reading another book on the Tudor dynasty? Perhaps this can be answered by Leanda de Lisle in “Tudor: The Family Story”.
Lisle’s version of events in “Tudor” stands out instantly, as the tone presented to the reader is not simply that of a recollection of Tudor monarchy life; but the basics and underlying psychosis of the family. Lisle begins the history backtracking to Owen Tudor and his “fall” into royalty. Although nothing new is learned by the expert reader; the family history will be understood in a new light. Lisle reveals the Tudors in a smooth way in which their emotions and actions throughout the decades make clear sense. Thus, although the story isn’t new, the fresh perception is.
Lisle’s text is heavily researched and accurate, skipping the biases and speculation which are abundant even in the works of renowned historians. The pace is exciting and has a steady ratio of almost-fictional narrative to that of an academic piece. However, at times Lisle goes off on the flowery descriptions and either grazes or rushes too quickly on the historical events (I suspect that she could produce a solid HF novel).
A notable characteristic of “Tudor” is the breath of life Lisle gives to some figures who are often ignored such as Mary and Margaret Tudor (the sisters of Henry VIII) and Margaret Douglas. Plus, the chronology is solid and all major points are highlighted without jumping back-and-forth which could confuse new readers.
Lisle seamlessly interweaves the text with descriptions of ‘everyday’ life/culture which instead of feeling like tangents; clearly sets the stage for Tudor lie and again: makes everything clear and understandable. “Tudor” is also filled with anticipation, with even the seasoned Tudorphile wanting to know what happens (even though he or she already knows).
On the negative end, Lisle has the habit of mentioning a thought or idea which is contrary to popular belief but doesn’t elaborate or offer clear sources. I would welcome new angles but need details. Also slightly annoying is Lisle maintaining the trend of quoting Shakespeare within her historic text. Shakespeare was NOT a historian and his plays were just that: plays. Not sure why so many authors insist on this.
The second half of “Tudor” has more of a detective focus with Lisle debunking some much-talked about Tudor myths. The only issue with this is a lack of description/argument and notes with holes in the connection (I had many, “You got this from that?!” moments). Despite this, Lisle also displayed the strength of not following stereotypes in “Tudor”: Mary isn’t vilified, Elizabeth isn’t glorified, etc. Instead, Lisle simply sees the strengths and weaknesses of each figurehead.
The conclusion of “Tudor” is exceptionally strong, wrapping up Elizabeth’s reign (but again, not overly romanticizing her); flowing into a memorable, well-rounded Epilogue in which Lisle truly brings home the Tudor message in a way not many history books have. Lisle doesn’t just stop there, as she briefly discusses some Tudor myths in the Appendices. For those readers who enjoy notes, Lisle offers pages worth while also serving up color plates and genealogical trees.
Even though one may not experience new information on the pages of “Tudor”, the presentation is entirely new. Versus a straightforward look at Tudor history, Lisle opens up the personal view of the Tudors and how THEY viewed themselves which explains their actions better then a simple look at their political actions. Lisle successfully treads a middle ground where readers both new and old to the topic will find enjoyment. “Tudor” is well-written and extremely readable with Lisle showing a marked improvement in her writing (it is obvious that she has more great things in store). Although not perfect, “Tudor” is very much recommended for anyone and everyone interested in the topic.
Note: My rating is more of a 4.5 but rounded to 4 versus 5
Lisle’s version of events in “Tudor” stands out instantly, as the tone presented to the reader is not simply that of a recollection of Tudor monarchy life; but the basics and underlying psychosis of the family. Lisle begins the history backtracking to Owen Tudor and his “fall” into royalty. Although nothing new is learned by the expert reader; the family history will be understood in a new light. Lisle reveals the Tudors in a smooth way in which their emotions and actions throughout the decades make clear sense. Thus, although the story isn’t new, the fresh perception is.
Lisle’s text is heavily researched and accurate, skipping the biases and speculation which are abundant even in the works of renowned historians. The pace is exciting and has a steady ratio of almost-fictional narrative to that of an academic piece. However, at times Lisle goes off on the flowery descriptions and either grazes or rushes too quickly on the historical events (I suspect that she could produce a solid HF novel).
A notable characteristic of “Tudor” is the breath of life Lisle gives to some figures who are often ignored such as Mary and Margaret Tudor (the sisters of Henry VIII) and Margaret Douglas. Plus, the chronology is solid and all major points are highlighted without jumping back-and-forth which could confuse new readers.
Lisle seamlessly interweaves the text with descriptions of ‘everyday’ life/culture which instead of feeling like tangents; clearly sets the stage for Tudor lie and again: makes everything clear and understandable. “Tudor” is also filled with anticipation, with even the seasoned Tudorphile wanting to know what happens (even though he or she already knows).
On the negative end, Lisle has the habit of mentioning a thought or idea which is contrary to popular belief but doesn’t elaborate or offer clear sources. I would welcome new angles but need details. Also slightly annoying is Lisle maintaining the trend of quoting Shakespeare within her historic text. Shakespeare was NOT a historian and his plays were just that: plays. Not sure why so many authors insist on this.
The second half of “Tudor” has more of a detective focus with Lisle debunking some much-talked about Tudor myths. The only issue with this is a lack of description/argument and notes with holes in the connection (I had many, “You got this from that?!” moments). Despite this, Lisle also displayed the strength of not following stereotypes in “Tudor”: Mary isn’t vilified, Elizabeth isn’t glorified, etc. Instead, Lisle simply sees the strengths and weaknesses of each figurehead.
The conclusion of “Tudor” is exceptionally strong, wrapping up Elizabeth’s reign (but again, not overly romanticizing her); flowing into a memorable, well-rounded Epilogue in which Lisle truly brings home the Tudor message in a way not many history books have. Lisle doesn’t just stop there, as she briefly discusses some Tudor myths in the Appendices. For those readers who enjoy notes, Lisle offers pages worth while also serving up color plates and genealogical trees.
Even though one may not experience new information on the pages of “Tudor”, the presentation is entirely new. Versus a straightforward look at Tudor history, Lisle opens up the personal view of the Tudors and how THEY viewed themselves which explains their actions better then a simple look at their political actions. Lisle successfully treads a middle ground where readers both new and old to the topic will find enjoyment. “Tudor” is well-written and extremely readable with Lisle showing a marked improvement in her writing (it is obvious that she has more great things in store). Although not perfect, “Tudor” is very much recommended for anyone and everyone interested in the topic.
Note: My rating is more of a 4.5 but rounded to 4 versus 5
November 17, 2013
Why read another a Tudor book? De Lisle takes on the family history from Owen Tudor to James I. This isn't another Henry and his wives book. De Lisle's NF books are not text bookish. They are easy to read and before you know it hours have gone by, she brought many new things to my attention (proof Margaret Beaufort wasn't the evil step mother, Henry VIII wanted 16 executors in charge of Edward, was Mary Queen of Scots raped?) I consider myself very informed on the Tudors and I thoroughly enjoyed this book. Great read!
January 12, 2020
Nothing new in this one but an interesting and entertaining read none the less. My only gripe with this one just like most books about the Tudors is the lesser known family members get shoved to the sidelines and barely get a mention.
October 4, 2020
De Lisle's Tudor is not what you may expect. It is most certainly not a general history of the 5 Tudor monarchs or of Britain during their reigns. In this volume, the reader will find only passing reference to major international events such as the Field of Cloth of Gold or the Spanish Armada. He or she will find even less on most domestic policies between the times of Henry VII and Elizabeth I. Rather, De Lisle's work concentrates on one specific area--hereditary succession. Readers will learn about the many branches of the British royal family and about each of their claims to the throne. If this is your interest, look no further; you are unlikely to find a better book on the subject. However, if you would like a broader picture of the Tudor monarchs or this historical period, do not waste another second considering this book.
June 13, 2025
As the Tudors were one of my (weird) interests in childhood, I recently felt the urge to revisit that fascination. I was looking for something that would tell the Tudor story from start to finish in a way that was both informative and digestible, and this book delivered on every front!
What impressed me most was how much detail de Lisle managed to include while keeping the narrative cohesive and engaging. The writing is clear and compelling, making complex events and historical figures easy to follow. The research is brilliant, with the author drawing on a wide range of sources and perspectives, both old and new, to present a well rounded, balanced view of events.
Reading this also deepened my sympathy for the women of the time, who must have lived in constant fear for being used as pawns in dangerous political games orchestrated by the men around them… Games that could cost them or their families their lives😞😞
This book was the perfect starting point for diving back into the world of the Tudors, and it’s left me eager to explore more books on the subject. A brilliant, accessible read for anyone looking to (re)discover this dramatic chapter of English history!!
What impressed me most was how much detail de Lisle managed to include while keeping the narrative cohesive and engaging. The writing is clear and compelling, making complex events and historical figures easy to follow. The research is brilliant, with the author drawing on a wide range of sources and perspectives, both old and new, to present a well rounded, balanced view of events.
Reading this also deepened my sympathy for the women of the time, who must have lived in constant fear for being used as pawns in dangerous political games orchestrated by the men around them… Games that could cost them or their families their lives😞😞
This book was the perfect starting point for diving back into the world of the Tudors, and it’s left me eager to explore more books on the subject. A brilliant, accessible read for anyone looking to (re)discover this dramatic chapter of English history!!
September 10, 2025
Tudors were perhaps the most infamous English royal family with names like Henry VIII and Bloody Mary being most well known. Tudors, notorious for their brutality, started their reign with the horrendous killing and butchering of the last surviving Plantagenet king, Richard III.
This book offers a comprehensive overview of Henry Tudor’s rise to power and follows his descendants right until the death of Elizabeth I.
I personally, do not like the Tudor’s much and favour the Plantagenets. However, I found this book rather entertaining and informative. I’d say it’s a very good starting point for anyone interested in Tudor history.
This book offers a comprehensive overview of Henry Tudor’s rise to power and follows his descendants right until the death of Elizabeth I.
I personally, do not like the Tudor’s much and favour the Plantagenets. However, I found this book rather entertaining and informative. I’d say it’s a very good starting point for anyone interested in Tudor history.
December 31, 2014
I've read a good number of books on the Tudors. It's my favorite period of history.
This book is extremely thoroughly reasearched and presents events in an unbiased manner. This is important because I've read enough books on the Tudors that have been slightly compromised due to an author's opinion being forced on the reader. It's frankly annoying when that happens and De Lisle refrained from making this mistake.
She had a bit of a wry sense of humor which I appreciate. Just enough to make it entertaining not distracting. I appreciated her defense of Margaret Beaufort as well; the author portrayed her as a wonderfully intelligent, resourceful mother who tirelessly worked to secure the safety and legacy of her son Henry (often at great peril for her own safety). Oddly Beaufort is often recalled as a formidable, dour presence (not helped by artistic renderings of her in late life) but the author made her inspiring and likable. Her depiction of Elizabeth Woodville was also particularly poignant. The mothers in Tudors history often endured long separations from their children and dealt with their children's deaths as well. Despite the glittering romantic portayals of the Tudors in cinema these grim realities made life literally hang in the balance for these matriarchs.
The Tudor kings who were judged harshly by modern critics were somewhat defended by the author as well; Henry VII was basically raised in exile and had be quite careful, almost paranoid for his own survival. Unfortunately his cautiousness became a bit exaggerated late in his reign; his laws became almost Draconian and as a result he was not popular with his kingdom. Henry Vlll started out as a jocular, athletic and beloved ruler but also suffered the same fate. His reign was remembered as being full of bloodshed and terror. Constant threats of rebellion, religious strife and plotting amongst palace insiders created an insidious petri dish of volatility.
Almost anyone familiar with Tudor history has a strong opinion about the 'Lost princes in the Tower' the sons of Elizabeth Woodville taken by their uncle Richard lll. Some feel Richard ordered their murder (feeling they presented a threat to his reign). Others argue that such a sober, pious ruler would never do such a thing. Some have speculated that Margaret Beaufort was behind their demise (in order to pave the way of her son, Henry Vll to the throne). What is known is this: Richard lll never made mention of the princes after their incarceration in The Tower. He never acknowledged their deaths and certainly never held a funeral mass for them. He did not want a religious cult/martyrdom developing around the princes which was a possibility if people knew they were murdered. After Henry Vll took the throne (defeating Richard lll at Bosworth) he maintained the secrecy surrounding the princes for much the same reason. Although bones were discovered many years later (buried at the foot of stairs in The Tower) and forensic analysis confirms the bones are that of two children approximately the same age as the princes there is still no absolute cetaintly about the fate of the two boys. This is such an emotionally fraught topic, the death of two innocents. Unfortunately for Richard his reign will always be besmirched with this black cloud of ignominy. And the fact that he had a genetic deformity (likely scoliosis), aka a hunchback it adds to the image of him being a monster. De Lisle tried to explain the treachery of being a ruler and how Richard was merely maintaining his dominance as a ruler. I wasn't sure if she was giving him a pass if he ordered 'a hit' so to speak but it seem perhaps she was. If the princes had been allowed to live they could raise an army as adults against their uncle. Call me crazy but I still think Richard was an asshole. It's a matter of opinion of course! Henry Vlll and his daughter Elizabeth also executed would be rivals.
Elizabeth started off beloved by her people and acknowledged them lovingly 'as her very own children'. In her later years her popularity waned with the ongoing war and her subjects enduring financial troubles. She cleverly refused to name an heir (as was expected of a monarch) for years knowing that as soon as she did the power plays and plotting against her would be set in motion. For someone with little politcal training she showed exemplary cunning. While some speculated her refusal to marry was because she was lovelorn for her Master of The Horse, Robert Dudley (and secret lover) her reasons were more pragmatic. If Elizabeth were to marry she would have less control and more plotting to contend with; she thought it best to avoid the situation entirely.
Each Tudor player was covered in great detail with much attention given to the human aspects of lives. This not only made the book a pleasure to read (meaning not too dry) it also gave a three dimensional view of this most fascinating time in history. A good writer and I'll be checking out her other books. A must read for anyone interested in this period or anyone looking for a good introduction.
This book is extremely thoroughly reasearched and presents events in an unbiased manner. This is important because I've read enough books on the Tudors that have been slightly compromised due to an author's opinion being forced on the reader. It's frankly annoying when that happens and De Lisle refrained from making this mistake.
She had a bit of a wry sense of humor which I appreciate. Just enough to make it entertaining not distracting. I appreciated her defense of Margaret Beaufort as well; the author portrayed her as a wonderfully intelligent, resourceful mother who tirelessly worked to secure the safety and legacy of her son Henry (often at great peril for her own safety). Oddly Beaufort is often recalled as a formidable, dour presence (not helped by artistic renderings of her in late life) but the author made her inspiring and likable. Her depiction of Elizabeth Woodville was also particularly poignant. The mothers in Tudors history often endured long separations from their children and dealt with their children's deaths as well. Despite the glittering romantic portayals of the Tudors in cinema these grim realities made life literally hang in the balance for these matriarchs.
The Tudor kings who were judged harshly by modern critics were somewhat defended by the author as well; Henry VII was basically raised in exile and had be quite careful, almost paranoid for his own survival. Unfortunately his cautiousness became a bit exaggerated late in his reign; his laws became almost Draconian and as a result he was not popular with his kingdom. Henry Vlll started out as a jocular, athletic and beloved ruler but also suffered the same fate. His reign was remembered as being full of bloodshed and terror. Constant threats of rebellion, religious strife and plotting amongst palace insiders created an insidious petri dish of volatility.
Almost anyone familiar with Tudor history has a strong opinion about the 'Lost princes in the Tower' the sons of Elizabeth Woodville taken by their uncle Richard lll. Some feel Richard ordered their murder (feeling they presented a threat to his reign). Others argue that such a sober, pious ruler would never do such a thing. Some have speculated that Margaret Beaufort was behind their demise (in order to pave the way of her son, Henry Vll to the throne). What is known is this: Richard lll never made mention of the princes after their incarceration in The Tower. He never acknowledged their deaths and certainly never held a funeral mass for them. He did not want a religious cult/martyrdom developing around the princes which was a possibility if people knew they were murdered. After Henry Vll took the throne (defeating Richard lll at Bosworth) he maintained the secrecy surrounding the princes for much the same reason. Although bones were discovered many years later (buried at the foot of stairs in The Tower) and forensic analysis confirms the bones are that of two children approximately the same age as the princes there is still no absolute cetaintly about the fate of the two boys. This is such an emotionally fraught topic, the death of two innocents. Unfortunately for Richard his reign will always be besmirched with this black cloud of ignominy. And the fact that he had a genetic deformity (likely scoliosis), aka a hunchback it adds to the image of him being a monster. De Lisle tried to explain the treachery of being a ruler and how Richard was merely maintaining his dominance as a ruler. I wasn't sure if she was giving him a pass if he ordered 'a hit' so to speak but it seem perhaps she was. If the princes had been allowed to live they could raise an army as adults against their uncle. Call me crazy but I still think Richard was an asshole. It's a matter of opinion of course! Henry Vlll and his daughter Elizabeth also executed would be rivals.
Elizabeth started off beloved by her people and acknowledged them lovingly 'as her very own children'. In her later years her popularity waned with the ongoing war and her subjects enduring financial troubles. She cleverly refused to name an heir (as was expected of a monarch) for years knowing that as soon as she did the power plays and plotting against her would be set in motion. For someone with little politcal training she showed exemplary cunning. While some speculated her refusal to marry was because she was lovelorn for her Master of The Horse, Robert Dudley (and secret lover) her reasons were more pragmatic. If Elizabeth were to marry she would have less control and more plotting to contend with; she thought it best to avoid the situation entirely.
Each Tudor player was covered in great detail with much attention given to the human aspects of lives. This not only made the book a pleasure to read (meaning not too dry) it also gave a three dimensional view of this most fascinating time in history. A good writer and I'll be checking out her other books. A must read for anyone interested in this period or anyone looking for a good introduction.
April 7, 2023
A long read, but excellent research. Together with the notes and appendices, this is the most “definitive” book covering the Tudors.
November 30, 2015
Leanda de Lisle has a gift for writing historical books. When the history is as compelling as that of the Tudors, no embellishment is needed, and de Lisle tells the story masterfully. This book is impeccably researched, and de Lisle backs up everything she says with primary sources, which she then uses to debunk a lot of popular myths and misconceptions that have sprung up around the Tudors.
The great thing about this book is its broad scope, and de Lisle manages to weave a coherent story of five generations here, spanning two centuries of English history. Context is everything, and the whole family saga makes a lot more sense in the way de Lisle has presented it. Sure, we’ve heard this all before – Henry VIII’s wives, and his kids messing with each other – but as part of the larger story it becomes fascinating all over again. She also makes it accessible, with gentle reminders of who is who when needed, but trusting that the reader will keep up.
If I had to nitpick, I would say de Lisle skips over much of Margaret Tudor’s fascinating later history navigating Scottish politics, and that she should have addressed Margaret Pole’s claim to the throne at some point (because scarcely a chapter goes by without mention of a rival heir descended from George, Duke of Clarence). But Tudor is already an impressive tome, so it seems churlish to complain about even more stuff that should have been included.
Anyone who’s a fan of the time period and wants a clear picture of the history, or who just wants to know the facts behind Philippa Gregory’s fiction, would do well to pick up this book. I eagerly await de Lisle’s next offering!
The great thing about this book is its broad scope, and de Lisle manages to weave a coherent story of five generations here, spanning two centuries of English history. Context is everything, and the whole family saga makes a lot more sense in the way de Lisle has presented it. Sure, we’ve heard this all before – Henry VIII’s wives, and his kids messing with each other – but as part of the larger story it becomes fascinating all over again. She also makes it accessible, with gentle reminders of who is who when needed, but trusting that the reader will keep up.
If I had to nitpick, I would say de Lisle skips over much of Margaret Tudor’s fascinating later history navigating Scottish politics, and that she should have addressed Margaret Pole’s claim to the throne at some point (because scarcely a chapter goes by without mention of a rival heir descended from George, Duke of Clarence). But Tudor is already an impressive tome, so it seems churlish to complain about even more stuff that should have been included.
Anyone who’s a fan of the time period and wants a clear picture of the history, or who just wants to know the facts behind Philippa Gregory’s fiction, would do well to pick up this book. I eagerly await de Lisle’s next offering!
October 18, 2013
I love all things Tudor and despite having many historical factual books about the Tudors already sitting on my bookshelf, there is always room for one more.
Leanda De Lisle has created a very readable account of this fascinating family and provides the facts in an easy to understand, and very enjoyable manner. The founding of this tumultuous dynasty was fraught with danger and political upheaval, all of which is expertly explored in well divided sections. The story starts in 1437, with the contentious marriage between Owen Tudor and Katherine de Valois, the widow of Henry V, and continues in easily divided sections through the subsequent Tudor reigns of Henry VII, Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I. The book also explores the relationships these monarchs had with their Plantagenet and Stuart cousins, which provides a more subtle family portrait rather than a gloomy historical documentary.
Beautifully researched and annotated, the book succeeds in portraying the Tudors as living breathing people, and despite the inherent cruelty of the era, in which they lived; the Tudor family are successfully shown as human beings with faults and foibles, and who were doing the best they could to succeed in a turbulent world.
If you are familiar with the Tudors then this book will not offer up any startling new evidence, but as an aide memoir it works really well, especially if like me you devour Tudor fiction.
My thanks to NetGalley and Perseus Books Group and Public Affairs Books
Leanda De Lisle has created a very readable account of this fascinating family and provides the facts in an easy to understand, and very enjoyable manner. The founding of this tumultuous dynasty was fraught with danger and political upheaval, all of which is expertly explored in well divided sections. The story starts in 1437, with the contentious marriage between Owen Tudor and Katherine de Valois, the widow of Henry V, and continues in easily divided sections through the subsequent Tudor reigns of Henry VII, Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I. The book also explores the relationships these monarchs had with their Plantagenet and Stuart cousins, which provides a more subtle family portrait rather than a gloomy historical documentary.
Beautifully researched and annotated, the book succeeds in portraying the Tudors as living breathing people, and despite the inherent cruelty of the era, in which they lived; the Tudor family are successfully shown as human beings with faults and foibles, and who were doing the best they could to succeed in a turbulent world.
If you are familiar with the Tudors then this book will not offer up any startling new evidence, but as an aide memoir it works really well, especially if like me you devour Tudor fiction.
My thanks to NetGalley and Perseus Books Group and Public Affairs Books
August 24, 2013
I loved it. Now I am not a fan of Henry Tudor (being a bit of a Ricardian), however, I was impressed with Leanda's documenting of the origins of the Tudor Monarchs of England (not to be confused by their ancient Welsh counterparts). I was especially impressed with the retelling of Margaret Beaufort's story - she is such a feisty women who was determined to shape her future, and that of her son, as best she could given the mores of the time.
I would recommend this as a welcome and insightful addition to any Tudor library - a great starting place for those wishing to delve deeper into this period of history.
I would recommend this as a welcome and insightful addition to any Tudor library - a great starting place for those wishing to delve deeper into this period of history.
June 30, 2019
Everything you need to know about the Tudors in a nutshell (well, roughly 500 pages). Nevertheless this book is absolutely fascinating, sparks your interest and after reading this you'll end up with an entire shelf of Tudor history books in no time (trust me).
The story begins way before the notorious Henry VIII (whom we all know and don't love); with Owen Tudor. I was thrilled to find in depth account of current political climate of England - The War of the Roses, the lost Princes, it enables you to see the whole picture of the new ruling family and their claims to the throne.
It's honestly the best book to start your 'Tudor adventure' with.
The story begins way before the notorious Henry VIII (whom we all know and don't love); with Owen Tudor. I was thrilled to find in depth account of current political climate of England - The War of the Roses, the lost Princes, it enables you to see the whole picture of the new ruling family and their claims to the throne.
It's honestly the best book to start your 'Tudor adventure' with.
April 8, 2014
Enjoyed the focus on the Tudor family before the beginning of the famous Henry. Got bored yet again when it falls back into telling Henry/Mary/Elizabeth stories. Probably because it seems like a retread of all the other Tudor focused histories.
September 23, 2020
Leanda de Lisle surprises in the best way by finding a new way to look and talk about the Tudors, presenting their dynasty from the angle of very closely following the bloodline, and how much the Tudor monarchs were effected by the other branches of the family.
Thanks to the marriages of Henry VIII's sisters Margaret and Mary, we see how their descendants interplayed with Tudor politics, and how much French and Scottish politics impacted events, far more than the Spanish politics that usually gets all the attention.
I love, loved, loved the amount of detail that was always still readable despite the amount of time covered, and how we see all these events and people playing out their dramas concurrently.
April 14, 2024
A really well-written account of the Tudor story that chooses to begin not with Henry VII on Bosworth field, but with the humble origins of his grandfather, the Welshman Owen Tudor, and takes us all the way through to the Virgin Queen Elizabeth I. I studied different parts of the Plantagenet and Tudor story at degree level, so it was really interesting reading it as a "whole" and seeing how all the different threads connect.
August 2, 2013
I both read and write history, so I inhaled this 560-page book (ARC) that opens with Owen Tudor, a commoner, to the end of Elizabeth I's reign.
The author, de Lisle wrote through the lens of the Tudor era, a time of warring, intrigue, and intense scrabbling over succession. The early Tudor monarchs were not royal and their paranoia of losing their thrones drove everything they did—from marriages and divorces, to politics and religion. It was a violent, cruel time.
Many books on the subject have left us with impressions of "Bloody Mary" and "Gloriana" that stem from Victorian hyperbole. Tudor corrects those myths. For example, Elizabeth I executed more people than Henry VIII and Mary I did during their reigns.
While well-researched and the myths corrected, Tudor is not a dry read, rather a page-turner. I recommend it to all who read well-written history and are eager for the latest research on the subject.
The author, de Lisle wrote through the lens of the Tudor era, a time of warring, intrigue, and intense scrabbling over succession. The early Tudor monarchs were not royal and their paranoia of losing their thrones drove everything they did—from marriages and divorces, to politics and religion. It was a violent, cruel time.
Many books on the subject have left us with impressions of "Bloody Mary" and "Gloriana" that stem from Victorian hyperbole. Tudor corrects those myths. For example, Elizabeth I executed more people than Henry VIII and Mary I did during their reigns.
While well-researched and the myths corrected, Tudor is not a dry read, rather a page-turner. I recommend it to all who read well-written history and are eager for the latest research on the subject.
November 22, 2013
This Tudor historian should probably stick to what she knows best, rather than wade into areas she hasn't researched well. Perhaps the fact that it's Richard III's picture on the cover, instead of Edward VI's, should have been my first clue, but I was still shocked to find that the author's work was heavy on supposition when it came to her take on the king whose throne was usurped. What can't possibly be known either way is often stated as fact when it backs up her notions about history and she leaves out much of the other side of the story when it comes to how Henry Tudor managed to become king. This would be fine, except that she writes only enough of it to be damning.
I'm not as well versed on the rest of the Tudors' history, so it's hard to know if the rest of the book is filled with as sloppy research as the first chapters are.
I'm not as well versed on the rest of the Tudors' history, so it's hard to know if the rest of the book is filled with as sloppy research as the first chapters are.
April 17, 2015
For anyone with a love of Tudor history, this book is a delight. Leanda de Lisle has exhaustively researched the Tudor family and written a book that is complex, without being confusing, and packed with details that transport you back in time.
I loved de Lisle's first book on the Grey sisters and couldn't wait to read more of her work. De Lisle has a captivating writing style that brings the era alive and weaves in the intrigues of the royal court.
Reading her book is like going on an epic adventure to solve the mysteries of the past. What more can you ask for in a book about history?
I loved de Lisle's first book on the Grey sisters and couldn't wait to read more of her work. De Lisle has a captivating writing style that brings the era alive and weaves in the intrigues of the royal court.
Reading her book is like going on an epic adventure to solve the mysteries of the past. What more can you ask for in a book about history?
May 13, 2020
3.5 while I will take away no merit from Leanda de Lisle for this amazing book I must admit it was like a CRASH COURSE in Tudor history. I guess I wanted more in the way of story but I DID learn so much and now I feel I am more prepared to read more in-depth history about the family members I am most interested in, thanks to this book. I also appreciate how Mary Tudor was portrayed here. As my favorite Tudor, I feel she usually gets the short end of the stick and the whole epithet of Bloody Mary which, while deserved indeed, paints her as nothing but a villain.
May 15, 2015
A well written, fact filled, horrifying book about a lot of not very nice people. There were six Tudors who sat on the throne if you count poor, disputed Jane, and the damage they did to their little kingdom was immense. The obsession with power, the fear of losing it, and the sheer ego involved in this pursuit make for an interesting, if fatiguing read. Heads do roll.
January 8, 2024
De Lisle promised to uncover some misconceptions about the Tudors but I found that most of the book reiterated accessible information. She also dangerously presented her opinions on some controversial or nuanced topics with little acknowledgment that they were her guesses instead of obvious fact.
October 20, 2019
4.5
Las dinastías reales (especialmente las británicas) siempre me interesaron, pero quitando datos random de un par de figuras históricas, no sé mucho sobre el tema. Este año descubrí el musical Six (todos temazos, súper recomendado), y eso reavivo mi interés en el tema, y después de leer durante más de una hora sobre los Tudor en Wikipedia me dije "es hora de buscar una biografía y aprenderme bien la historia".
Y lo hice, y qué historia aprendí. de Lisle relata la historia de los Tudor de una manera accesible, cosa que le agradezco, que te engancha desde la primera página y nunca llega a resultar tediosa. Y otra cosa que le agradezco es que empiece desde los orígenes de la dinastía (aunque, como la autora dice, ellos nunca se pensaron como tal), con Owen Tudor y su tan inesperado como afortunado matrimonio con Catherine de Valois, en vez de arrancar con el reinado de Henry VII, o directamente con Henry VIII, como vi que hacen varias biografías. A lo largo del libro, también, la autora da una mirada más comprensiva a un par de figuras que no son recordadas muy amablemente, como Mary I y Margaret Beaufort, no justificando sus acciones sino entendiéndolas en el contexto sociopolítico de su época. Esto me gustó particularmente, ya que creo que es fundamental entender como la gente pensaba y actuaba en consecuencia en su contexto original para poder, o al menos tratar, de entender la historia (eso no significa, por supuesto, que nos tengan que gustar. Sí Henry VIII me seguís pareciendo un forro).
Con una buena prosa y un estilo conciso y ameno, de Lisle nos hace recorrer 170 años de historia, pasando por la Guerra de las Rosas, la desaparición de los Príncipes en la Torre, la unión de las casas York y Lancaster, Henry VIII y sus seis esposas, la reforma protestante, la contrareforma, y muchísimo más. La historia de los Tudor en una historia fascinante, y conocerla no tuvo desperdicio.
"For us, however, the name of the rose is Tudor, and the family story that began with Owen ends with a salute to the memory of the clumsy servant who, with a pirouette and a trip, fell into the lap of English royal history."
Las dinastías reales (especialmente las británicas) siempre me interesaron, pero quitando datos random de un par de figuras históricas, no sé mucho sobre el tema. Este año descubrí el musical Six (todos temazos, súper recomendado), y eso reavivo mi interés en el tema, y después de leer durante más de una hora sobre los Tudor en Wikipedia me dije "es hora de buscar una biografía y aprenderme bien la historia".
Y lo hice, y qué historia aprendí. de Lisle relata la historia de los Tudor de una manera accesible, cosa que le agradezco, que te engancha desde la primera página y nunca llega a resultar tediosa. Y otra cosa que le agradezco es que empiece desde los orígenes de la dinastía (aunque, como la autora dice, ellos nunca se pensaron como tal), con Owen Tudor y su tan inesperado como afortunado matrimonio con Catherine de Valois, en vez de arrancar con el reinado de Henry VII, o directamente con Henry VIII, como vi que hacen varias biografías. A lo largo del libro, también, la autora da una mirada más comprensiva a un par de figuras que no son recordadas muy amablemente, como Mary I y Margaret Beaufort, no justificando sus acciones sino entendiéndolas en el contexto sociopolítico de su época. Esto me gustó particularmente, ya que creo que es fundamental entender como la gente pensaba y actuaba en consecuencia en su contexto original para poder, o al menos tratar, de entender la historia (eso no significa, por supuesto, que nos tengan que gustar. Sí Henry VIII me seguís pareciendo un forro).
Con una buena prosa y un estilo conciso y ameno, de Lisle nos hace recorrer 170 años de historia, pasando por la Guerra de las Rosas, la desaparición de los Príncipes en la Torre, la unión de las casas York y Lancaster, Henry VIII y sus seis esposas, la reforma protestante, la contrareforma, y muchísimo más. La historia de los Tudor en una historia fascinante, y conocerla no tuvo desperdicio.
"For us, however, the name of the rose is Tudor, and the family story that began with Owen ends with a salute to the memory of the clumsy servant who, with a pirouette and a trip, fell into the lap of English royal history."
August 6, 2020
A thoroughly enjoyable book.
A period I personally, don’t always find the most interesting was made exciting and informative. De Lisle managed to change my opinion on virtually all of the Tudor monarchs and, made me want to learn more about the fringe characters that had such an impact on 16th century England.
A book well worth reading for anyone who has even a passing interest in the Tudor monarchs as it doesn’t bombard you with titles and boring politics. A vibrant book full of human details, fully enjoyed.
A period I personally, don’t always find the most interesting was made exciting and informative. De Lisle managed to change my opinion on virtually all of the Tudor monarchs and, made me want to learn more about the fringe characters that had such an impact on 16th century England.
A book well worth reading for anyone who has even a passing interest in the Tudor monarchs as it doesn’t bombard you with titles and boring politics. A vibrant book full of human details, fully enjoyed.
May 7, 2025
What an interesting story, o read the red Queen a while back and was looking for the next chapter till I came across this one.
The details and moves that were made by every monarch to protect their reign and how the Queens came to rule. I didn’t expect that much cruelty though, or the removal of family members by imprisonment or death.
The details and moves that were made by every monarch to protect their reign and how the Queens came to rule. I didn’t expect that much cruelty though, or the removal of family members by imprisonment or death.
October 24, 2024
Well researched, comprehensive and engagingly written - an excellent history of the Tudor dynasty, shining the spotlight not just on the monarchs but also lesser known yet important family members who tend to be overlooked elsewhere.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 228 reviews