What do you think?
Rate this book
Unhumans: The Secret History of Communist Revolutions
If you don’t understand communist revolutions, you aren’t ready for what’s coming. The old rules are over. The old order is over. Accusations are evidence. Activism means bigotry and hate. Criminals are allowed to roam free. Citizens are locked up. An appetite for vengeance is unleashed—to deplatform, debank, destroy. This is the daily news, yet none of it’s new. Patterns from the past make sense of our present. They also foretell a terrifying future we might be condemned to endure. For nearly 250 years, far-left uprisings have followed the same battle plans—from the first call for change to last innocent executed, from denial a revolution is even happening to declaration of the new order. Unhumans takes readers on a shocking, sweeping, and succinct journey through history to share the untold stories of radical takeovers that textbooks don’t teach. And there is one We're in a new revolution right now. But this is not a book about ideology or politics. Unhumans reveals that communism, socialism, Marxism, and all other radical-isms are not philosophies but tactics—tactics that are specifically designed to unleash terror on everyday people and revoke their human rights to life, liberty, and property. These are the forces of unhumanity. This is what they do. Every. Single. Time. Unhumans steals their playbook, breaks apart their strategies piece by piece, and lays out the tactics of what it takes to fight back—and win, using real-world examples. Unhumans is the essential read for every concerned citizen both of the US and worldwide. We must stop what is coming.
272 pages, Hardcover
Published July 9, 2024
453 people are currently reading
1291 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 93 reviews
May 10, 2025
"This is not a book about communist ideology. You’ve read those. This is a book about the communist reality—and how to tell when it’s coming to a society near you..."
Unhumans was a good book with an important message, but the formatting was a bit jumbled at times, and I felt that the overall story here could have been conveyed without so much editorializing. More below.
Author Jack Posobiec is a graduate of Temple University and a former Naval Intelligence Officer. He was deployed to Guantanamo Naval Base for ten months in 2012 and is fluent in Mandarin.
Joshua Lisec is a writer with over eighty books to his credit. Together, Jack and Joshua unwrap a dazzling yet dire history of Communism’s impact on humanity across the globe. From the Russian Revolution to the true story of the Spanish Civil War, they describe and explain the 1950s emergence of Cultural Marxism in the United States, and its current resurgence.
Jack Posobiec:
As the book's frank title indicates, the writing style here is very pointed and opinionated. While the prose is definitely very engaging and readable, I felt that a lot of the commentary was redundant. The book opens with a decent foreword by Steve Bannon.
The quote from the start of this review continues:
The book's title is a reference to the barbaric - inhuman - nature of Socialism/Communism. Consuming roughly 100 million lives in ~100 years, this disastrous ~200-year social experiment is the worst man-made catastrophe in history. But still, somehow, you will find many useful idiots in academia, the media class, authors, commentators, and assorted pundits who advocate for it. I've always found it paradoxical that anyone in these arenas calling themselves a fascist would be run out of town by mobs of angry people, but being a socialist is considered interesting and "cool..."
The authors drop this quote; speaking to the nature of the leftist threat, and its long history:
In this short bit of writing, they tell the reader what the book will cover:
Unfortunately, and as touched on above; their tone here was not really measured. Although I, too have a great personal disdain for the ideology of communism, I feel that the book should have stuck more to just telling its story. There are many passages of commentary tossed in here, and I didn't feel like they added to the book. For example, the authors say "THIS is what they do." about 200x in the book. It got irritating. I'm sure that the average reader is able to draw patterns out of the writing here and come to that conclusion themselves...
I also was not particularly fond of the formatting of the book. I felt that it jumped around way too much, losing narrative continuity and frustrating the reader (well, this reader, anyhow...)
On a positive note; many of the most important socialist uprisings are briefly covered here, along with some other tangentially-related topics.
Among them:
• The death of George Floyd
• The death of Michael Brown
• The media persecution of Nicholas Sandmann
• Historical case studies: France, Haiti, Russia, Spain, China
• The Civil Rights movements of the 1960s
• Cultural Marxism
• Joseph MacCarthy; his name turned into a pejorative
• Marxist propaganda infiltrating Hollywood
• The Cuban Revolution (1953–1959)
• Marxist Chile (1970–1973)
• A Long Red Night in Nicaragua (1978–1990)
• The Afghan-Soviet War (1979–1989)
• Rhodesia House Blues
• “Kill the Boer”: New Apartheid in South Africa
• Three Ways to Crush the Revolution, Revisited
******************
Unhumans was a still a decent look into the history of socialist revolutions and their tactics. It is also a sobering look into the far-left's creeping power into all aspects of Western life.
I would recommend it to anyone interested.
3.5 stars.
Unhumans was a good book with an important message, but the formatting was a bit jumbled at times, and I felt that the overall story here could have been conveyed without so much editorializing. More below.
Author Jack Posobiec is a graduate of Temple University and a former Naval Intelligence Officer. He was deployed to Guantanamo Naval Base for ten months in 2012 and is fluent in Mandarin.
Joshua Lisec is a writer with over eighty books to his credit. Together, Jack and Joshua unwrap a dazzling yet dire history of Communism’s impact on humanity across the globe. From the Russian Revolution to the true story of the Spanish Civil War, they describe and explain the 1950s emergence of Cultural Marxism in the United States, and its current resurgence.
Jack Posobiec:
As the book's frank title indicates, the writing style here is very pointed and opinionated. While the prose is definitely very engaging and readable, I felt that a lot of the commentary was redundant. The book opens with a decent foreword by Steve Bannon.
The quote from the start of this review continues:
"...History does not repeat, but it rhymes. For as long as there have been beauty and truth, love and life, there have also been the ugly liars who hate and kill. This is the way of things in all things. There is light and there is dark. Always has been. Always will be. Civilization is the superstructure built on law and order that keeps the petty, the resentful, and the cruel away from the rest of us. Some societies have been better at this than others. Those who fail at repelling the repulsive fall to unhumanity—to a state of affairs in which human thriving is impossible and surviving improbable."
The book's title is a reference to the barbaric - inhuman - nature of Socialism/Communism. Consuming roughly 100 million lives in ~100 years, this disastrous ~200-year social experiment is the worst man-made catastrophe in history. But still, somehow, you will find many useful idiots in academia, the media class, authors, commentators, and assorted pundits who advocate for it. I've always found it paradoxical that anyone in these arenas calling themselves a fascist would be run out of town by mobs of angry people, but being a socialist is considered interesting and "cool..."
The authors drop this quote; speaking to the nature of the leftist threat, and its long history:
"The authors argue that it is humanity itself currently under threat. They unwrap the history of Communism, a dehumanizing philosophy of oppression, of denial of human rights and nihilism.
The reader is guided around the world, revealing the stories and histories the mainstream press won’t touch … from Cambodia, Nicaragua, Chile, Afghanistan and the Soviets, to Apartheid in South Africa. They bring us right up to President Donald Trump and January 6th, a day they correctly call “America’s Inverse Bastille.”
In this short bit of writing, they tell the reader what the book will cover:
"While academic and reference titles explore the motives and agenda of household-name leaders during each left-wing upheaval, this book will give you on-the-ground descriptions of what it’s really like to witness (and fight) communist forces of change. We have recast the story of communism as individuals against individuals, as real people, to reveal how and why neighbors turn against neighbors. Why even yours might, against you. Along the way, we will reintroduce you to the household names of history, but in a way you’ve never seen before—we will tell their true stories.
And unlike some popular conservative commentators—who are nakedly reactionary and hyperbolically defeatist in their retellings of left-wing political history—this book will offer a measured tone. We will take this subject as seriously as deserved. And in the process, this book will inoculate you and by extension those you love from ever falling for revolutionary ideas that accelerate the end of everything."
Unfortunately, and as touched on above; their tone here was not really measured. Although I, too have a great personal disdain for the ideology of communism, I feel that the book should have stuck more to just telling its story. There are many passages of commentary tossed in here, and I didn't feel like they added to the book. For example, the authors say "THIS is what they do." about 200x in the book. It got irritating. I'm sure that the average reader is able to draw patterns out of the writing here and come to that conclusion themselves...
I also was not particularly fond of the formatting of the book. I felt that it jumped around way too much, losing narrative continuity and frustrating the reader (well, this reader, anyhow...)
On a positive note; many of the most important socialist uprisings are briefly covered here, along with some other tangentially-related topics.
Among them:
• The death of George Floyd
• The death of Michael Brown
• The media persecution of Nicholas Sandmann
• Historical case studies: France, Haiti, Russia, Spain, China
• The Civil Rights movements of the 1960s
• Cultural Marxism
• Joseph MacCarthy; his name turned into a pejorative
• Marxist propaganda infiltrating Hollywood
• The Cuban Revolution (1953–1959)
• Marxist Chile (1970–1973)
• A Long Red Night in Nicaragua (1978–1990)
• The Afghan-Soviet War (1979–1989)
• Rhodesia House Blues
• “Kill the Boer”: New Apartheid in South Africa
• Three Ways to Crush the Revolution, Revisited
******************
Unhumans was a still a decent look into the history of socialist revolutions and their tactics. It is also a sobering look into the far-left's creeping power into all aspects of Western life.
I would recommend it to anyone interested.
3.5 stars.
July 13, 2024
This book is the greatest read on the destructive history of communism I’ve ever read.
You will explore the history of communism in countries like France, Russia, Chile, Spain, Argentina, China, Cambodia, South Africa, and more.
You will find out so many things the Left doesn’t want you to like how Franco and Pinochet were actually anti-communist nationalist!
Jack Posobiec is a patriot and hero for writing this book! A must read for all people who love freedom and hate tyranny!
You will explore the history of communism in countries like France, Russia, Chile, Spain, Argentina, China, Cambodia, South Africa, and more.
You will find out so many things the Left doesn’t want you to like how Franco and Pinochet were actually anti-communist nationalist!
Jack Posobiec is a patriot and hero for writing this book! A must read for all people who love freedom and hate tyranny!
July 23, 2024
One of the most hilariously sanctimonious, demagogic books I've read in the last little while.
The crux of the "argument" (if Posobiec's boogeyman whining can be called that) is that mobs of "nihilistic, cynical, envious" people will use all sorts of ideological labels (within the spectrum of Leftism) to undermine, demoralize, and otherwise decay the foundations of Western civilization, and civilization in general.
Why? Because they're broken and simply no-good, that's why. LOL.
So don't you dare "fall for it"!
What I find most consistently amusing about all this is that the disgusting, nihilistic types of progressives he's describing (and YES, they DO exist) are the product of a consumerist society that started in the 1980s. They are narcissists. They are gullible. They have a persecution complex. They are simple-minded. None of this is false. But the mistake he makes is not realizing that this is the product of American middle-class consumerist capitalism and nothing else.
So what then? Instead of Posobiec's fear, we should realize that these toxic people do exist, but that this should not allow interest groups of the sort he represents to brainwash you into thinking that social and economic progress is impossible.
The crux of the "argument" (if Posobiec's boogeyman whining can be called that) is that mobs of "nihilistic, cynical, envious" people will use all sorts of ideological labels (within the spectrum of Leftism) to undermine, demoralize, and otherwise decay the foundations of Western civilization, and civilization in general.
Why? Because they're broken and simply no-good, that's why. LOL.
So don't you dare "fall for it"!
What I find most consistently amusing about all this is that the disgusting, nihilistic types of progressives he's describing (and YES, they DO exist) are the product of a consumerist society that started in the 1980s. They are narcissists. They are gullible. They have a persecution complex. They are simple-minded. None of this is false. But the mistake he makes is not realizing that this is the product of American middle-class consumerist capitalism and nothing else.
So what then? Instead of Posobiec's fear, we should realize that these toxic people do exist, but that this should not allow interest groups of the sort he represents to brainwash you into thinking that social and economic progress is impossible.
August 6, 2024
'Unhumans' - endorsed by JD Vance, Donald Trump's running mate for the 2024 presidential election - is imaginatively paranoid, painting a whole complex world of interconnected world Communism, a rewrite of world history ("the untold story of... the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, the Spanish civil war, Mao's Communist revolutions, civil rights and cultural Marxism in America, Soviet-sponsored revolutionary wars, Communism in Africa), from the ideological perspective of the far Right fringe. "Or the unhumans will seize everything, purge the past, and eat the rich - literally. This what they do" Using slightly different wording, variations of 'this is what unhumans do', is repeated throughout to emphasize the book's Communistic paranoid rewrite of history. Regarding the Right's January 6 attack on the US Capital: "The demonstration was not an insurrection. The insurrection hoax was used to begin a purge of Trump supporters... (It) was an inverse Bastille... subversives purged their enemies by... luring them into a government building." Authors quote Spain mid-1930's Generalissimo Franco saying: "we do not believe in government through the voting booth" - and appear to endorse that view for the United States. A good read if you are from the furthest fringe of the Right, looking for a wide-swath rewrite of world history, and to have your paranoia confirmed, explained and presented on a big society screen - and ready to transform U.S. democracy into a dictatorship. As authors say "The unhumans will not stop unless they are stopped" - the 'unhumans' authors speak of are US citizens who disagree with them. If not looking for that - or looking for insight into what the fringe Right wants for the future of the USA - read something else.
August 6, 2024
The only positive thing I can say about this book is at least it's short.
TLDR: these guys don't understand the topic they're writing about. It's bad enough that they literally suggest socialist principles like dual power, decentralized social services, etc but with different names.
TLDR: these guys don't understand the topic they're writing about. It's bad enough that they literally suggest socialist principles like dual power, decentralized social services, etc but with different names.
June 17, 2025
I confess I did not read this entire book. It's possible I just happened to read the stupidest, most historically illiterate chapters, and the rest is actually brilliant political theory and historical analysis. But I doubt it.
The modern culture war stuff does not interest me, but I do know something about the Spanish Civil War. Posobiec, despite his hero-worship of Franco, doesn't. So I'll focus on that chapter. I do think his admiration of a man responsible for the murders of at least 100,000 people is repulsive, but I'll try to refrain from making any moral judgment and stick to Posobiec's poor grasp of the actual facts of history.
Proceeding chronologically through the chapter:
You'll also find real, historical, not-at-all edited photographs of Francisco Franco and Adolf Hitler, because the two men did meet with each other at Hendaye in 1940, and the former was a great admirer of the latter.
This is not straightforwardly WRONG, but it is a funny way to phrase it. I wouldn't say there's much of a popular "Manuel Azaña good" narrative at all because I doubt 1 in 100 people outside of Spain knows who Manuel Azaña was.
In the following paragraphs, Posobiec treats us to a lurid description of various atrocities committed by leftist forces during the war (who he insists on referring to as "rojos"), especially those directed against nuns and priests.
He then introduces the heroes of his story thusly:
This is an audacious sleight of hand on Posobiec's part. The implication here is that Spain under the Popular Front was a hellish slaughterhouse where enemies of communism were murdered by the thousands with impunity. In fact, the great 'red terror' that did indeed result in the deaths of thousands of innocent people (though significantly fewer than Franco's own terror, which Posobiec of course ignores), did not erupt until AFTER the military uprising. The explosion of carnage was a direct RESPONSE to the "alzamiento.". That is not to justify it, but to say that Posobiec's framing of the rising as a RESPONSE to the red terror is flagrantly dishonest, and a perfect inversion of the truth. To take an analogy from the American Civil War, this would be like implying that the Confederate states seceded from the Union in 1860 because of Lincoln's invasion of the south, rather than the other way around. Our author knows very, very little about the Spanish Civil War, less than one would glean by skimming wikipedia, but even so I doubt he is THIS ignorant. Reading any popular level history of the Spanish Civil War, like Beevor's The Battle for Spain, which he cites (though of course, it's quite possible he didn't actually read it), would have set him straight on this point, so this has to be deliberate deception of his audience. Funny, considering he begins the book with a condemnation of "ugly liars" (we've established the second half of that pejorative applies to Posobiec, and to be honest I don't think he's all that good looking).
To be entirely fair, there is a kernel of truth here. The Popular Front government elected in February of 1936 did engage in arbitrary arrest of various political opponents, the censure of rightist parties, and the closure of right-wing papers. The left was not blameless in the lead-up to the war. But this was no different than the way of the various preceding Spanish governments of other political shades over the previous decades; it was not some expression of a uniquely leftist tendency towards despotism. The right-radical government of 1933-36 had treated the left exactly the same, with the mass arrests of peaceful demonstrators, the illegal removal of elected left-wing officials from their posts, and the nakedly partisan harassment of left-wing papers and political organizations. The left in 1936 did little worse than give what they had gotten a few years earlier. Spain in general was short on principled moderates in the 1930s.
Some 400 people were in fact killed in the months between the February elections and the outbreak of the civil war, but to portray these as victims of leftist terror is dishonest in the extreme. In fact, over 70% of them were leftist workers and peasants killed in confrontation with state security forces, something you'd think Posobiec would be very happy to hear. The remainder were political assassinations, but culpability was about evenly split between killers of the left and right, with the right actually having a slight edge in the death toll. (See Eduardo González Calleja's Cifras Cruentas for the definitive study on violence in the Second Republic). To portray Spain under the Popular Front as an unrestrained orgy of communist bloodshed is nonsense.
Debatable, at least. By some counts, the Republic received slightly more war materiel from the Soviet Union and France than the rebels received from Germany Italy. But this fails to account for two things:
A) with the exception of a few cutting edge weapons from the USSR like the Polikarpov fighters and the T-26 tank, much of the equipment was severely outdated and of inferior quality.
B) the Republic was made to pay through the nose for the aid received from the USSR (the infamous "Moscow gold"). Franco received his aid from Hitler and Mussolini on credit.
Moreover, of the two sides, only the rebels had entire army-sized formations of foreign troops fighting in their ranks (Mussolini's CTV).
Well, no. The brigades of foreign fighters organized by the Comintern were called "The International Brigades" and there were five of them. it would certainly be accurate to refer to them as "International Antifascist Brigades" but this was not the official name of any one of the brigades, nor of the brigades collectively. I'm unclear as to what Posobiec means by "one of these was called the International Antifascist Brigade." They were ALL called "International Brigade" (numbered XI through XV) and none of them was called "International Antifascist Brigade."
A small quibble, but typical of Posobiec's sloppy research.
Furthermore, whatever one thinks of the IB men's politics, to refer to them as a bunch of "would-be-radicals" who came to Spain to "rob and/or kill any non-communists" is just slanderous nonsense. The brigadistas made a long and perilous journey to Spain and fought a desperately underequipped fight for no reward except the chance to die fighting for a cause they believed in. While many atrocities were committed by the leftist forces in Spain, the IB men were implicated in almost none of these. Off the top of my head, I am unable to think of any example of a volunteer in any of the IB brigades killing or robbing a Spanish civilian. I am sure it must have happened, but it was not widespread, and that was not why these men came to Spain.
Nonsense. The relationship between the Axis and the Spanish insurgents was not some desperate alliance of convenience, with poor Franco holding his nose the whole time. Franco was a deep and sincere admirer of the fascist states, and openly declared his intention to build his own state on a "totalitarian and corporate" model. He despised not "communism" but also democracy, liberalism, women's rights, and just about everything post-dating 1492.
Posobiec's account of the infamous infighting among the various leftist factions in Spain is as garbled and ignorant as the rest of the chapter.
Well, no. The purges within Republican Spain were not an example of a purity spiral, with more and more extreme leftists massacring their less-extreme comrades. Rather, it was a case of the exact opposite. The more 'moderate' leftists (the PCE and their allies, the PSUC, the Negrín sector of the PSOE, etc.) purged or pacified the more 'radical' leftists (most famously the POUM, but also the more recalcitrant sectors of the CNT and the 'caballerista' faction of the PSOE) in order to maintain the international image of the Republic as a respectable liberal democracy and consolidate control over industry and agriculture in the rear.
No. The PCE was steadfastly trying to avoid a bolshevik revolution in Spain, hence their ferocious opposition to the revolutionary anarchists and poumistas in Catalonia. The Comintern line at this point was the "Popular Front." All national communist parties subordinated to Moscow were to disclaim revolutionary action in favor of a democratic anti-fascist front with the social democratic and liberal parties. Whether the Communists would have stuck to this line in the event of a Republican victory is another question, but the policy of the Spanish communists during the civil war was exactly the opposite of a "speed-run" of the Bolshevik revolution.
He did plenty of both.
So, a dictator? What is Posobiec's definition of 'dictatorship' that fails to encompass Franco?
Though the Spanish Civil War had not actually been particularly destructive of Spain's material wealth, Franco's stupid, fascist autarkic economic policy resulted in dire shortages of grain and other food-stuffs, and through the 1940s, as many as 200,000 Spaniards starved to death or died of malnutrition-induced disease. An entirely avoidable "terror famine," which can be charged to Franco's ideologically driven economic regime. Just like Stalin.
The implication that support for the Axis was limited to the Falange is nonsense. Franco was thoroughly sympathetic towards the Axis states, and hoped for a German victory as late as 1945. His failure to enter into the war had less to do with any repugnance towards fascism and Nazism and everything to do with the fact that Hitler KNEW Spain would prove more of a hindrance than a help, and thus actively discouraged her open adherence to the Axis.
Half-truth at best. The CEDA (what Posobiec is presumably referring to by "right-wing parties", since otherwise this claim makes no sense at all. Though I doubt he really knows what the CEDA was.) won a plurality in the elections of 1933, it is true. But a very narrow one. And it was not the "left" that prevented the CEDA from taking power, but the Republic's conservative Catholic president Alcalá-Zamora (despised by the left, in fact), who refused to appoint CEDA leader Gil Robles to the prime ministership. Nevertheless, the Radical government of Alejandro Lerroux, who Alcalá-Zamora invited to form a government after the '33 elections (the Radicals had the second-most seats in parliament, behind the CEDA), governed in coalition with the CEDA, and over the course of the next two years, drifted further and further to the right, until by 1936 all the CEDA could complain of was that they were only getting MOST of what they wanted, rather than all of it.
Bombastic, but I think a pretty accurate distillation of the Spanish insurgents and the cause they fought for.
Orwell never regretted that he fought against Franco, and he always maintained that the Republic with all its flaws was far preferable to fascism.
The endorsements on this book from a potential future Vice President of the United States is just embarrassing. Not (only) because of the repugnant nature of the book as a whole, a thinly-veiled incitement to violence, but because it's just so stupid and shallow. It's not even good Franco apologia. If Pío Moa was dead, he'd be spinning in his grave.
I'll finish with this:
I'll answer this with an excerpt from an account by Esmond Romilly, Winston Churchill's nephew, who served in the International Brigades. Here, he describes a roll-call taken by General Walter, commander of the mostly-German XI International Brigade, after a night of particularly vicious fighting around Boadilla in November of 1936, at the height of the rebel siege of Madrid:
Walter took in his hands the list of the first company of the Thaelmann Battalion, just before midnight , meanwhile the guard change was taking place. He was pronouncing every name and paused until the silence became unbearable.
Oswald and his patrol of fifteen men … all were missing; I suddenly remembered those rifles pointing down in that trench and those bayoneted bodies. The commander crossed their names out with the same word: “gefallen” (fallen in German).
From the first and second section, only fifteen men answered: hier! (Here!). Forty-three did not respond. Third section, three Germans responded hier!
Until he reached the English group:
Addley: unanswered, without information, gefallen!
Avener: dead, gefallen!
Brich: unanswered, probably dead, gefallen!
Cox: died, gefallen!
I knew they were dead, but still could not believe it. It was as if were witnessing the last chance for the men to appeal against a death sentence that I knew it was irrevocable.
Gillan: wounded
Gough: dead, gefallen!
Jeans: disappeared, gefallen!
Messer: no answer, disappeared, gefallen!
Addley, Avener, Cox, Messer, and the rest of their 'unhuman' comrades, foreign and Spanish, who died for a cause greater than themselves, were a hundred times braver than an obnoxious blowhard like Posobiec could ever be.
The modern culture war stuff does not interest me, but I do know something about the Spanish Civil War. Posobiec, despite his hero-worship of Franco, doesn't. So I'll focus on that chapter. I do think his admiration of a man responsible for the murders of at least 100,000 people is repulsive, but I'll try to refrain from making any moral judgment and stick to Posobiec's poor grasp of the actual facts of history.
Proceeding chronologically through the chapter:
Look up images of his rule in Spain, and you’ll quickly find amateur-edited photographs showing a side-by-side of Francisco Franco with Adolf Hitler and, naturally, swastikas.
You'll also find real, historical, not-at-all edited photographs of Francisco Franco and Adolf Hitler, because the two men did meet with each other at Hendaye in 1940, and the former was a great admirer of the latter.
The “Manuel Azaña good, Francisco Franco bad” narrative is retold and reinforced in popular media.
This is not straightforwardly WRONG, but it is a funny way to phrase it. I wouldn't say there's much of a popular "Manuel Azaña good" narrative at all because I doubt 1 in 100 people outside of Spain knows who Manuel Azaña was.
In the following paragraphs, Posobiec treats us to a lurid description of various atrocities committed by leftist forces during the war (who he insists on referring to as "rojos"), especially those directed against nuns and priests.
He then introduces the heroes of his story thusly:
All that unhuman bloodshed unleashed upon Christians and landlords among other targets could not go unpunished. Total anarchy had been unleashed upon enemies of the red state; believers in an orderly, traditional Catholic Spain felt called to quell the terror. And so a counterrevolution was born in the shape of a big-tent coup d’état— a military uprising.
This is an audacious sleight of hand on Posobiec's part. The implication here is that Spain under the Popular Front was a hellish slaughterhouse where enemies of communism were murdered by the thousands with impunity. In fact, the great 'red terror' that did indeed result in the deaths of thousands of innocent people (though significantly fewer than Franco's own terror, which Posobiec of course ignores), did not erupt until AFTER the military uprising. The explosion of carnage was a direct RESPONSE to the "alzamiento.". That is not to justify it, but to say that Posobiec's framing of the rising as a RESPONSE to the red terror is flagrantly dishonest, and a perfect inversion of the truth. To take an analogy from the American Civil War, this would be like implying that the Confederate states seceded from the Union in 1860 because of Lincoln's invasion of the south, rather than the other way around. Our author knows very, very little about the Spanish Civil War, less than one would glean by skimming wikipedia, but even so I doubt he is THIS ignorant. Reading any popular level history of the Spanish Civil War, like Beevor's The Battle for Spain, which he cites (though of course, it's quite possible he didn't actually read it), would have set him straight on this point, so this has to be deliberate deception of his audience. Funny, considering he begins the book with a condemnation of "ugly liars" (we've established the second half of that pejorative applies to Posobiec, and to be honest I don't think he's all that good looking).
To be entirely fair, there is a kernel of truth here. The Popular Front government elected in February of 1936 did engage in arbitrary arrest of various political opponents, the censure of rightist parties, and the closure of right-wing papers. The left was not blameless in the lead-up to the war. But this was no different than the way of the various preceding Spanish governments of other political shades over the previous decades; it was not some expression of a uniquely leftist tendency towards despotism. The right-radical government of 1933-36 had treated the left exactly the same, with the mass arrests of peaceful demonstrators, the illegal removal of elected left-wing officials from their posts, and the nakedly partisan harassment of left-wing papers and political organizations. The left in 1936 did little worse than give what they had gotten a few years earlier. Spain in general was short on principled moderates in the 1930s.
Some 400 people were in fact killed in the months between the February elections and the outbreak of the civil war, but to portray these as victims of leftist terror is dishonest in the extreme. In fact, over 70% of them were leftist workers and peasants killed in confrontation with state security forces, something you'd think Posobiec would be very happy to hear. The remainder were political assassinations, but culpability was about evenly split between killers of the left and right, with the right actually having a slight edge in the death toll. (See Eduardo González Calleja's Cifras Cruentas for the definitive study on violence in the Second Republic). To portray Spain under the Popular Front as an unrestrained orgy of communist bloodshed is nonsense.
They also benefited from the full support of the Comintern; the leftist republic received weapons, ammunition, airplanes, tanks, and other vehicles from the Soviet Union to wage civil war, exceeding far more than comparable warfighting resources that were provided to the Nationalists by Germany and Italy combined.
Debatable, at least. By some counts, the Republic received slightly more war materiel from the Soviet Union and France than the rebels received from Germany Italy. But this fails to account for two things:
A) with the exception of a few cutting edge weapons from the USSR like the Polikarpov fighters and the T-26 tank, much of the equipment was severely outdated and of inferior quality.
B) the Republic was made to pay through the nose for the aid received from the USSR (the infamous "Moscow gold"). Franco received his aid from Hitler and Mussolini on credit.
Moreover, of the two sides, only the rebels had entire army-sized formations of foreign troops fighting in their ranks (Mussolini's CTV).
Worldwide communist organizations also mobilized international brigades of volunteers so any would-be radical could come to Spain to rob and/or kill any and all non-communists. In fact, one of these was called the International Antifascist Brigade.
Well, no. The brigades of foreign fighters organized by the Comintern were called "The International Brigades" and there were five of them. it would certainly be accurate to refer to them as "International Antifascist Brigades" but this was not the official name of any one of the brigades, nor of the brigades collectively. I'm unclear as to what Posobiec means by "one of these was called the International Antifascist Brigade." They were ALL called "International Brigade" (numbered XI through XV) and none of them was called "International Antifascist Brigade."
A small quibble, but typical of Posobiec's sloppy research.
Furthermore, whatever one thinks of the IB men's politics, to refer to them as a bunch of "would-be-radicals" who came to Spain to "rob and/or kill any non-communists" is just slanderous nonsense. The brigadistas made a long and perilous journey to Spain and fought a desperately underequipped fight for no reward except the chance to die fighting for a cause they believed in. While many atrocities were committed by the leftist forces in Spain, the IB men were implicated in almost none of these. Off the top of my head, I am unable to think of any example of a volunteer in any of the IB brigades killing or robbing a Spanish civilian. I am sure it must have happened, but it was not widespread, and that was not why these men came to Spain.
The governments of Germany and Italy supported the Spanish Nationalists against the Soviet-backed Rojos in the war. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Nonsense. The relationship between the Axis and the Spanish insurgents was not some desperate alliance of convenience, with poor Franco holding his nose the whole time. Franco was a deep and sincere admirer of the fascist states, and openly declared his intention to build his own state on a "totalitarian and corporate" model. He despised not "communism" but also democracy, liberalism, women's rights, and just about everything post-dating 1492.
Posobiec's account of the infamous infighting among the various leftist factions in Spain is as garbled and ignorant as the rest of the chapter.
It was also a war between leftists and further leftists ... and the further leftists who came after these leftists were executed ... and then also against the even more extreme left following those leftists ... and so on and so on.
Well, no. The purges within Republican Spain were not an example of a purity spiral, with more and more extreme leftists massacring their less-extreme comrades. Rather, it was a case of the exact opposite. The more 'moderate' leftists (the PCE and their allies, the PSUC, the Negrín sector of the PSOE, etc.) purged or pacified the more 'radical' leftists (most famously the POUM, but also the more recalcitrant sectors of the CNT and the 'caballerista' faction of the PSOE) in order to maintain the international image of the Republic as a respectable liberal democracy and consolidate control over industry and agriculture in the rear.
The Spanish communists were trying to speed-run a Bolshevik uprising and so couldn’t wait for that apparently.
No. The PCE was steadfastly trying to avoid a bolshevik revolution in Spain, hence their ferocious opposition to the revolutionary anarchists and poumistas in Catalonia. The Comintern line at this point was the "Popular Front." All national communist parties subordinated to Moscow were to disclaim revolutionary action in favor of a democratic anti-fascist front with the social democratic and liberal parties. Whether the Communists would have stuck to this line in the event of a Republican victory is another question, but the policy of the Spanish communists during the civil war was exactly the opposite of a "speed-run" of the Bolshevik revolution.
Ironically, for being remembered in the West as a fascist dictator, the eventual victorious general Franco—the self-proclaimed caudillo, or leader, of postwar new Spain—didn’t actually do a lot of fascism or dictating.
He did plenty of both.
Following the surrender of all communist Rojos forces in Madrid on March 28, 1939, Franco became, in our view, a Washingtonian figure but without term limits.
So, a dictator? What is Posobiec's definition of 'dictatorship' that fails to encompass Franco?
Franco did not execute thousands of his own followers as Stalin or Mao did, nor did he turn Spanish society upside-down in the name of progress. There was no terror-famine in Spain, no Great Leap Forward, or Cultural Revolution. He was, simply, the caudillo. The boss.
Though the Spanish Civil War had not actually been particularly destructive of Spain's material wealth, Franco's stupid, fascist autarkic economic policy resulted in dire shortages of grain and other food-stuffs, and through the 1940s, as many as 200,000 Spaniards starved to death or died of malnutrition-induced disease. An entirely avoidable "terror famine," which can be charged to Franco's ideologically driven economic regime. Just like Stalin.
One right-wing faction of Nationalists called the Falange favored the fascism of Hitler’s Germany and Mussolini’s Italy, but they were marginalized. World War II was all risk, no reward from the Spanish perspective.
The implication that support for the Axis was limited to the Falange is nonsense. Franco was thoroughly sympathetic towards the Axis states, and hoped for a German victory as late as 1945. His failure to enter into the war had less to do with any repugnance towards fascism and Nazism and everything to do with the fact that Hitler KNEW Spain would prove more of a hindrance than a help, and thus actively discouraged her open adherence to the Axis.
right-wing parties won the November 1933 general election but were denied power.
Half-truth at best. The CEDA (what Posobiec is presumably referring to by "right-wing parties", since otherwise this claim makes no sense at all. Though I doubt he really knows what the CEDA was.) won a plurality in the elections of 1933, it is true. But a very narrow one. And it was not the "left" that prevented the CEDA from taking power, but the Republic's conservative Catholic president Alcalá-Zamora (despised by the left, in fact), who refused to appoint CEDA leader Gil Robles to the prime ministership. Nevertheless, the Radical government of Alejandro Lerroux, who Alcalá-Zamora invited to form a government after the '33 elections (the Radicals had the second-most seats in parliament, behind the CEDA), governed in coalition with the CEDA, and over the course of the next two years, drifted further and further to the right, until by 1936 all the CEDA could complain of was that they were only getting MOST of what they wanted, rather than all of it.
fascist killers who wanted to drag the good working people of Spain back to the Dark Ages by hook or by crook.
Bombastic, but I think a pretty accurate distillation of the Spanish insurgents and the cause they fought for.
Orwell, of course, came away disillusioned with the Rojos. Prior to service in the brigade, he had been pro-socialist. But after witnessing the violent purges of the Rojos side for himself, he was put off by all left-wingers from then onward.
Orwell never regretted that he fought against Franco, and he always maintained that the Republic with all its flaws was far preferable to fascism.
The endorsements on this book from a potential future Vice President of the United States is just embarrassing. Not (only) because of the repugnant nature of the book as a whole, a thinly-veiled incitement to violence, but because it's just so stupid and shallow. It's not even good Franco apologia. If Pío Moa was dead, he'd be spinning in his grave.
I'll finish with this:
The Spanish Civil War made willing martyrs of many. And that is one of many differences between the unhumans and the rest of us, particularly those of faith. Good, believing people are willing to die for a cause greater than ourselves. But unhumans are willing to kill innocents—and each other—for no cause at all.
I'll answer this with an excerpt from an account by Esmond Romilly, Winston Churchill's nephew, who served in the International Brigades. Here, he describes a roll-call taken by General Walter, commander of the mostly-German XI International Brigade, after a night of particularly vicious fighting around Boadilla in November of 1936, at the height of the rebel siege of Madrid:
Walter took in his hands the list of the first company of the Thaelmann Battalion, just before midnight , meanwhile the guard change was taking place. He was pronouncing every name and paused until the silence became unbearable.
Oswald and his patrol of fifteen men … all were missing; I suddenly remembered those rifles pointing down in that trench and those bayoneted bodies. The commander crossed their names out with the same word: “gefallen” (fallen in German).
From the first and second section, only fifteen men answered: hier! (Here!). Forty-three did not respond. Third section, three Germans responded hier!
Until he reached the English group:
Addley: unanswered, without information, gefallen!
Avener: dead, gefallen!
Brich: unanswered, probably dead, gefallen!
Cox: died, gefallen!
I knew they were dead, but still could not believe it. It was as if were witnessing the last chance for the men to appeal against a death sentence that I knew it was irrevocable.
Gillan: wounded
Gough: dead, gefallen!
Jeans: disappeared, gefallen!
Messer: no answer, disappeared, gefallen!
Addley, Avener, Cox, Messer, and the rest of their 'unhuman' comrades, foreign and Spanish, who died for a cause greater than themselves, were a hundred times braver than an obnoxious blowhard like Posobiec could ever be.
November 25, 2024
Utterly hateful, gaslighting drivel. To Maga believers we are unhuman. Not a real word actually, but we get it. We get that believers in this false history will look upon us as not a part of the human race. Let this serve as a warning to libs who think the election will end when Kamala is elected.
November 27, 2024
This is What They Do
A review of the Skyhorse Publishing / War Room Books kindle ebook (July 9, 2024) released simultaneously with the hardcover and following the earlier (June 26, 2024) release of the audiobook.
I am as anti-communist as the next Estonian or other person of Eastern European origin whose family escaped the post World War II totalitarian terror of Soviet Russia and who had family as far back as 1917 murdered by the Bolsheviks. But Posobiec and his ghostwriter Lisec are doing the cause no favours with the nose-stretchers and the twisted views of the historical record in this propaganda tract.
I was curious about this as it was issued under the name of the right-wing agitator Posobiec and by the Steve Bannon inspired imprint The War Room in the lead up to the November 2024 American election. Although the MAGA chants and the various Commie-la aspersions are not used in the book, the unspoken bias and condemnation can be read between the lines. I wasn't prepared to pay the shockingly high list price for the book, but a Kindle Deal of the Day price of $3.99 on August 30, 2024 was just the ticket.
The rather bold use of the title Unhumans, which echoes Nazi Germany's use of the term Untermenschen (German: Under humans / Sub humans) for their non-Aryan subjects or foes, sets the stage. But there are various eye-opening allusions to come before we even get to the 20th century Communist terrors.
Without being very specific, even Julius Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon is held up as an early example of a statesman putting down a proto-communist uprising. The French Revolution and the subsequent years of The Terror is used as another example of early communism. But probably the biggest shock is the portrayal of the Spanish dictatorship of Franco as a saviour of democracy.
Not all of it is untrue of course. There is no doubting the Red Terror of Lenin and Stalin, the decimation of the Chinese population by Mao Zedong, the Killing Fields of Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, etc. But exaggerating the case and stretching it into making anti-Communist heroes out of Caesar, Napoleon, Franco, etc. is just way over the top.
So this should be read with a ton of salt and a look at some legitimate history books before making any conclusions.
Footnote I took my lede from the refrain "This is what they do," which is repeated no less than 69 times (according to my kindle count) after each stated example in this book of how communists act or react.
Other Reviews
I noticed that the review by Arthur Rodriguez gives a lengthy rebuttal to the story of portraying Franco's totalitarian regime as democratic liberators and freedom fighters.
A review of the Skyhorse Publishing / War Room Books kindle ebook (July 9, 2024) released simultaneously with the hardcover and following the earlier (June 26, 2024) release of the audiobook.
I am as anti-communist as the next Estonian or other person of Eastern European origin whose family escaped the post World War II totalitarian terror of Soviet Russia and who had family as far back as 1917 murdered by the Bolsheviks. But Posobiec and his ghostwriter Lisec are doing the cause no favours with the nose-stretchers and the twisted views of the historical record in this propaganda tract.
I was curious about this as it was issued under the name of the right-wing agitator Posobiec and by the Steve Bannon inspired imprint The War Room in the lead up to the November 2024 American election. Although the MAGA chants and the various Commie-la aspersions are not used in the book, the unspoken bias and condemnation can be read between the lines. I wasn't prepared to pay the shockingly high list price for the book, but a Kindle Deal of the Day price of $3.99 on August 30, 2024 was just the ticket.
The rather bold use of the title Unhumans, which echoes Nazi Germany's use of the term Untermenschen (German: Under humans / Sub humans) for their non-Aryan subjects or foes, sets the stage. But there are various eye-opening allusions to come before we even get to the 20th century Communist terrors.
Without being very specific, even Julius Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon is held up as an early example of a statesman putting down a proto-communist uprising. The French Revolution and the subsequent years of The Terror is used as another example of early communism. But probably the biggest shock is the portrayal of the Spanish dictatorship of Franco as a saviour of democracy.
Not all of it is untrue of course. There is no doubting the Red Terror of Lenin and Stalin, the decimation of the Chinese population by Mao Zedong, the Killing Fields of Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, etc. But exaggerating the case and stretching it into making anti-Communist heroes out of Caesar, Napoleon, Franco, etc. is just way over the top.
So this should be read with a ton of salt and a look at some legitimate history books before making any conclusions.
Footnote I took my lede from the refrain "This is what they do," which is repeated no less than 69 times (according to my kindle count) after each stated example in this book of how communists act or react.
Other Reviews
I noticed that the review by Arthur Rodriguez gives a lengthy rebuttal to the story of portraying Franco's totalitarian regime as democratic liberators and freedom fighters.
August 12, 2024
I only read the first 68 pages but wow was this book unhinged and just absolute drivel. I thought the author was being ironic or satirical at first but then it dawned on me that people actually think like this and wow, next level crazy.
July 30, 2024
The cover is kind of scary but this book is so important! It covers different countries that have tried to implement communism and the horrors that come with it. It goes into the early stages of each revolution and how it pushed these countries into communism. It is a very important book for all people to read so you can see the warning signs before it’s too late!
August 6, 2024
Past Marxist revolutions are reviewed to provide a better understanding of the cultural Marxism of the Left in America today. While the history lesson is important, the real value of this volume is a discussion of why the radical Left needs to be defeated and effective measures to take to end their scourge.
February 17, 2025
“No one is more inferior than those who insist on being equal.”
— Frederich Nietzsche
When we think of great men and women who sparked revolutions, change, uprisings, and the exchange of ideas, do we think of Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi, or do we think of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin? Of course we think of Dr. King and Gandhi! Yet many young people today would rather have Mao and other cultural marxists as their role models.
This is not a book about Communist ideology. You’ve read those. This is a book about the Communist reality and how to tell when it’s coming to a society near you.
In the past couple of centuries, we’ve known them as “Communists” — socialists with extra steps — and of course, “Leftists”. “Radicals” and “revolutionaries” as well. One hundred years ago, “Marxists/Leninists”, then more recently, “cultural Marxists”. Even as, without irony and not as a joke, “progressives”. For the purposes of this book, we will call them the “Unhumans”.
Jack Posobiec weaves together a history of communist revolutions, why they failed, how many they killed to get their revolution, and how we can crush communism’s ugly face every time it starts to emerge.
Communism is much bigger than just the Soviet Union, and a handful of countries the Soviet’s influenced to make the entire globe a communist state. Today Marx’s little manifesto has influenced many far and wide from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, and we are tasked with crushing it before it kills millions more. Six million Jews died from Hitler’s “Final Solution”, but 20 million Russians died because of Lenin’s communist policies, with 85 million if you count the wars. 50 million passed in China since their “Great Leap Forward”. So why is communism never understood to be the greatest evil mankind has ever known that it is?
Communism always starts with a riot for equality, whether it be the French laypeople against the aristocracy, or the Bolsheviks against the rest. And they are always within the minority — a small fraction of the Russian population were actually communists when the Bolshevik Revolution took place and civil war broke out. But if left alone, their riots will always turn into Revolution. You may think that bringing equality to these people who feel oppressed is right and moral, until they are the ones who start to oppress everyone else.
Here are some more important points in the book:
—The Unhuman desires not to build a better world than the old one, with its very real and also vain issues. But to cut down and destroy all individual achievement and cultural greatness, so that the world is as miserable as they are.
— They don’t want a worker’s paradise, they want to burn down cities.
— In a Revolution, the Unhumans always come for the people of God; because for vengeance’s policy to thrive, there can be no higher power or greater will to serve than that of the Party.
Deaths Because of Communism:
— French Revolution Death Toll: 100,000
— Haitian Revolution Death Toll: 345,000
— Russian Revolution Death Toll: 20 Million
— Spanish Civil War Death Toll: 500,000
— Chinese Communist Revolution Death Toll: 50 Million
— 1960’s Cultural Marxism Death Toll: 1,000+ Deaths, 4.5 Million Ethically Cleansed
— Cold War Communist Revolutions Death Toll: 4 Million
— Communism in Africa Death Toll: 50,000+ Deaths, 1.5 Million Ethically Cleansed
The Communist Revolution is the darkest chapter in human history. Reason, perhaps by Divine Providence, it has come to us to end that bad chapter once and for all. We will! We’re going to win!
So go ahead, be a communism crusher!
— Frederich Nietzsche
When we think of great men and women who sparked revolutions, change, uprisings, and the exchange of ideas, do we think of Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi, or do we think of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin? Of course we think of Dr. King and Gandhi! Yet many young people today would rather have Mao and other cultural marxists as their role models.
This is not a book about Communist ideology. You’ve read those. This is a book about the Communist reality and how to tell when it’s coming to a society near you.
In the past couple of centuries, we’ve known them as “Communists” — socialists with extra steps — and of course, “Leftists”. “Radicals” and “revolutionaries” as well. One hundred years ago, “Marxists/Leninists”, then more recently, “cultural Marxists”. Even as, without irony and not as a joke, “progressives”. For the purposes of this book, we will call them the “Unhumans”.
Jack Posobiec weaves together a history of communist revolutions, why they failed, how many they killed to get their revolution, and how we can crush communism’s ugly face every time it starts to emerge.
Communism is much bigger than just the Soviet Union, and a handful of countries the Soviet’s influenced to make the entire globe a communist state. Today Marx’s little manifesto has influenced many far and wide from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, and we are tasked with crushing it before it kills millions more. Six million Jews died from Hitler’s “Final Solution”, but 20 million Russians died because of Lenin’s communist policies, with 85 million if you count the wars. 50 million passed in China since their “Great Leap Forward”. So why is communism never understood to be the greatest evil mankind has ever known that it is?
Communism always starts with a riot for equality, whether it be the French laypeople against the aristocracy, or the Bolsheviks against the rest. And they are always within the minority — a small fraction of the Russian population were actually communists when the Bolshevik Revolution took place and civil war broke out. But if left alone, their riots will always turn into Revolution. You may think that bringing equality to these people who feel oppressed is right and moral, until they are the ones who start to oppress everyone else.
Here are some more important points in the book:
—The Unhuman desires not to build a better world than the old one, with its very real and also vain issues. But to cut down and destroy all individual achievement and cultural greatness, so that the world is as miserable as they are.
— They don’t want a worker’s paradise, they want to burn down cities.
— In a Revolution, the Unhumans always come for the people of God; because for vengeance’s policy to thrive, there can be no higher power or greater will to serve than that of the Party.
Deaths Because of Communism:
— French Revolution Death Toll: 100,000
— Haitian Revolution Death Toll: 345,000
— Russian Revolution Death Toll: 20 Million
— Spanish Civil War Death Toll: 500,000
— Chinese Communist Revolution Death Toll: 50 Million
— 1960’s Cultural Marxism Death Toll: 1,000+ Deaths, 4.5 Million Ethically Cleansed
— Cold War Communist Revolutions Death Toll: 4 Million
— Communism in Africa Death Toll: 50,000+ Deaths, 1.5 Million Ethically Cleansed
The Communist Revolution is the darkest chapter in human history. Reason, perhaps by Divine Providence, it has come to us to end that bad chapter once and for all. We will! We’re going to win!
So go ahead, be a communism crusher!
March 7, 2025
Mr. Posobiec has written, in this reader's opinion, the definitive account of how the far Left conducts political warfare in the United States. "Unhumans" is to describe the history of Left Wing tactics throughout history; and that includes in Europe.
"We're in a new revolution right now" is the opinion of Mr. Posobiec. And from the conduct by the far Left at President Trump's recent speech before Congress, he is on point.
"We're in a new revolution right now" is the opinion of Mr. Posobiec. And from the conduct by the far Left at President Trump's recent speech before Congress, he is on point.
December 11, 2024
Doesn't even hide the fact that it's written by and for fascists
April 7, 2025
I'll keep this short and sweet. I enjoyed this book for the historical insight and the interesting stories of the different Communist Revolutions that have impacted our world. I don't think many of the 1 star reviewers really gave this book a fair shake and I believe several didn't even read the book. I think it's rather sad and ignorant when ratings are given simply based on a political slant. 'Nuff said.
I gave it only 4 stars because I felt the authors got a bit verbose at times and several sentences were written so 'clunky', I had to stop and re-read it to decipher what was trying to be said. But, that aside, I found the book quite informative and engrossing. There's always two sides of a story, and I find it intriguing how history will "change" the story over time to fit a political narrative, rather than to just be a record of the past. The Marxist revolution in Russia and the story of Spain's WWII leader, Franco were perfect examples of this. I have read conflicting "histories" of both.
Also, this book is NOT saying that poor people are responsible for pushing Communism. What I believe the authors are setting out to explain, is how certain individuals seeking power can influence and control the masses, especially those on the "lower end of the totem-pole". Just take a look at many of the so called "peaceful protests" that devastated many communities around the country. There is a direct correlation between the two. This does NOT mean everyone involved is necessarily bad, or even seeking communism. It shows that by energizing the "emotional" side of those that "have not", they can be manipulated into hatred toward those that "have". This is what leads to the Communist influence penetrating and destroying society.
That's just my oversimplified take on the book. Overall, not a bad read. It was a tad repetitive in sections, but informative. It was engaging and I enjoyed it. Just my 2 cents.
I gave it only 4 stars because I felt the authors got a bit verbose at times and several sentences were written so 'clunky', I had to stop and re-read it to decipher what was trying to be said. But, that aside, I found the book quite informative and engrossing. There's always two sides of a story, and I find it intriguing how history will "change" the story over time to fit a political narrative, rather than to just be a record of the past. The Marxist revolution in Russia and the story of Spain's WWII leader, Franco were perfect examples of this. I have read conflicting "histories" of both.
Also, this book is NOT saying that poor people are responsible for pushing Communism. What I believe the authors are setting out to explain, is how certain individuals seeking power can influence and control the masses, especially those on the "lower end of the totem-pole". Just take a look at many of the so called "peaceful protests" that devastated many communities around the country. There is a direct correlation between the two. This does NOT mean everyone involved is necessarily bad, or even seeking communism. It shows that by energizing the "emotional" side of those that "have not", they can be manipulated into hatred toward those that "have". This is what leads to the Communist influence penetrating and destroying society.
That's just my oversimplified take on the book. Overall, not a bad read. It was a tad repetitive in sections, but informative. It was engaging and I enjoyed it. Just my 2 cents.
August 12, 2024
I am a moderate conservative who despises Kamala Harris and people who support her. I voted for Trump in 2020 and will vote for him again in 2024. That being said . . .
I really, really, REALLY disliked this book and hate the fact that I spent $25.00 on it. First off, I disliked the writing style (short choppy sentences) and editing and the fact that it was a rehash of some facts that are well-known combined with a lot of OPINIONS presented as fact. Yes, there was quite a bit that I did not know -- such as WaPo reporting that only 13 blacks died at the hands of the police in 2019 and that there was enough fentanyl in George Floyd's death to kill him without the police doing anything else, according to one medical examiner.
But the fact that he used the word "unhumans" throughout the book to describe anyone who supported leftist ideology was VERY off-putting to me as I don't like anyone making any group into animals with the exception of people like terrorists and child rapists. There are a few other points that I also disagreed with, but at least I now have a better idea of what people on the far right think as opposed to those of us who just lean right or who are moderate conservatives.
I really, really, REALLY disliked this book and hate the fact that I spent $25.00 on it. First off, I disliked the writing style (short choppy sentences) and editing and the fact that it was a rehash of some facts that are well-known combined with a lot of OPINIONS presented as fact. Yes, there was quite a bit that I did not know -- such as WaPo reporting that only 13 blacks died at the hands of the police in 2019 and that there was enough fentanyl in George Floyd's death to kill him without the police doing anything else, according to one medical examiner.
But the fact that he used the word "unhumans" throughout the book to describe anyone who supported leftist ideology was VERY off-putting to me as I don't like anyone making any group into animals with the exception of people like terrorists and child rapists. There are a few other points that I also disagreed with, but at least I now have a better idea of what people on the far right think as opposed to those of us who just lean right or who are moderate conservatives.
August 8, 2024
I really wanted to give this book 5 stars because I believe the message is so important and I think the content is accurate and prescient. But it really needed another pass by an editor and/or proofreader and I felt like some sections were handled too superficially. Additionally, some current events were unfamiliar to me, so I sometimes missed his implications which were not thoroughly explained. Still, I highly recommend it, it was enlightening to see how communism has really been a global/globalism issue since inception and as a religious person, the conclusion I draw from it (not addressed by the very religious author, there’s very little mention of religion aside from the attacks on religious leaders historically) is that clearly communism and it’s close relation Marxism are tools of Satan. When I started reading, I felt like using the term Unhuman was very disrespectful but having finished, I see how it really works and is quite accurate. When Marxism reduces you to your race or class or gender etc in order to classify you as an oppressor or oppressed, you lose your identity as an individual, which is tragic.
September 10, 2024
Consider this book the John Galt final address to those who still have the faculty of reason and the will to see the world as it truly is. I have come away with the firm belief that we will win this spiritual war only when we personally develop the integrity to live our life for good and reject evil as unworthy of our limited time on this earth.
The realm of the civil war is good vs evil. The civil war is, and always has been spiritual, therefor it must be fought on the ideological level. Our defeat will come when our soul is destroyed. The destruction of the mainstream church, and family, has created a power vacuum that the pagans have rode to many victories over human nature. With [God] truth as our shield, we do mot need a physical sword to return humanity to God’s Plan. Keep your integrity and you will win. The spirit is the greatest value.
The realm of the civil war is good vs evil. The civil war is, and always has been spiritual, therefor it must be fought on the ideological level. Our defeat will come when our soul is destroyed. The destruction of the mainstream church, and family, has created a power vacuum that the pagans have rode to many victories over human nature. With [God] truth as our shield, we do mot need a physical sword to return humanity to God’s Plan. Keep your integrity and you will win. The spirit is the greatest value.
September 5, 2024
Very worrisome that this country is seeing all these warning signs of leftists who want to tear down the existing structure. Open borders, defund the police, radical DA's who won't prosecute criminals. It's a path we can't afford to go down and this book really shows the commonality of previous communist regimes and what is being tried now in the USA. It's a cliche, but people really need to open their eyes and get away from mainstream media to see what is going on.
April 9, 2025
This book takes you through several Communist Revolutions. Lots to learn here
November 18, 2024
A WIDE-RANGING (IF IMPRECISE) ATTACK ON ‘LEFTISTS,’ AND OTHERS
Authors Jack Posobiec and Joshua Lisec wrote in the Introduction to this 2024 book, “This is not a book about communist ideology… This is a book about the communist reality---and how to tell when it’s coming to a society near you… For as long as there have been beauty and truth, love and life, there have also been the ugly liars who hate and kill… Civilization is the superstructure built on law and order that keeps the petty, the resentful, and the cruel away from the rest of us. Some societies are better at this than others. Those who fail at repelling the repulsive fall to unhumanity---to a state of affairs in which human thriving is impossible and surviving improbable. It doesn’t matter what you call the people of anti-civilization. They will change their name, shape, and form as needed… For the purposes of this book, we will call them ‘unhumans’… With power, unhumans undo civilization itself… By becoming consumed by nihilism, unhumans oppose everything that makes up humanity… It all begins with a wedge between two identifiable groups in a given society—the haves, and the have-nots, which they prefer to call the oppressor and the oppressed… They don’t even want equality. They just want an excuse to destroy everything. They want an excuse to destroy you.” (Pg. xiii-xiv)
They state in Chapter 1, “As we write this, law and order has been overturned. The prevailing order is in disarray… In twenty-first century America, accusations are now evidence; denial is guilt. Activism means open bigotry and actual hate---as long as it’s directed at certain unpopular people and ‘privileged’ groups… Speak louder and unleash a ravenous appetite for vengeance---to deplatform you, debank your family, and destroy your good name. No prospects for work, bank accounts closed or seized, and reputation in ruin. This is what they do.” (Pg. 3)
They continue, “This book is also the story of a playbook. A playbook that every far-left uprising, insurrection, and usurpation of order, goodwill, and freedom follows, and what has been done to fight back, for good or for loss… We have a vested interest in this subject. We, your humble authors… are both fathers. Husbands. Businessmen. Investors in the future… We believe in the God-given will of the human spirit to build a greater, better world than the one we found ourselves in… There is only one force powerful enough to bring us to this point and beyond: the force of anti-civilization. Unhumanity.” (Pg. 4-5)
They contrast modern progressives with historical situations, namely: The French and Haitian Revolutions; the Russian Revolution; the Spanish Civil War; the Chinese Civil War; America’s 1960s Revolution and Culture War, etc. (Pg. 5-6)
They begin Chapter 2, “Conservative authors and pundits have been writing about the left for forty-five plus years. And for forty-five years, the United States … [has] moved to the Left. Why is this? Our thesis is that the conservative movement has failed to conserve anything worth conserving. This is why we are in the situation we currently find ourselves in, and it is in fact a state of learned helplessness.” (Pg. 7)
They continue, “Unhumans STILL support communism after it killed 100 million people in the twentieth century… And yet, conservatives would rather whine about equal treatment while unhumans are drawing them toward freshly dug graves. Unhumans live to persecute the normal, once they take power. Anyone who calls them out … [is] humiliated, unpersoned.’” (Pg. 9)
However, they have some proposals for action: Let them [the unhumans] eat themselves; find the Great Men of History; Win before fighting. They suggest, “We, the normal people, can band together, take united and decisive action, and nip revolution in the bud. WE can win before fighting---as long as we understand that a fight IS coming.” (Pg. 57-59)
They observe, “Perhaps the next time there is a Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek, we will rally around him, give him everything he needs, and crush the revolution before it can even occur. Perhaps. Of the unhumans will seize everything, purge the past, and eat the rich---literally. This is what they do.” (Pg. 136)
They note, “The ‘60s didn’t happen without legitimate grievance driving great and necessary change. People wanted to abolish Jim Crow---an understandable desire, considering how much pain and suffering legalized racial discrimination and ‘separate but equal’ segregation caused. But as the decade wore on, many young radicals got angry that sweeping away Jim Crow laws in 1964 did not immediately eradicate all causes (or consequences) of their grievances. And there youths were gathered, they made their voices heard. That was the college campus… Fast-forward to today. Every college had two, three, or even ten of these fake departments running grievance studies courses that actively DISPREPARE students for productive careers and meaningful lives in the modern world.” (Pg. 144-145)
They go on, “Equal treatment under the law is good. Actual color-blindness under the law is a goal that should be championed… As a civilization, we were already well underway in the accomplishment of that vision by the 1960s, a vision that is a thoroughly Christian one… But as progress continued into the 1960s, we began to see radicals turn reactionary---and stir up violent and ANTIPROGRESS through Cultural Marxism.” (Pg. 147-148)
They assert, “The terrible truth is that there is a distinct and revolutionary movement we are all witnessing in the modern-day West, one directly and indirectly responsible for all that demoralizing and demeaning. And yet it’s different from previous uprisings in visibility, publicity, and intensity. It is a revolution nonetheless and follows the same arc as every unhuman story does. It is: The Irregular Communist Revolution… Specifically, the Irregular Communist Revolution in the late-state republic West is a Cultural Marxist revolution---the targets are social and cultural, not economic.” (Pg. 192-193)
They contend, “After watching radical mobs burn and loot without consequence in the summer of 2020, supporters of then-President Donald J. Trump thought they would freely protest what in their view was a sketchy election result… these well-meaning patriots believed they could and should speak truth to power on power’s home turf---the US Capitol. On January 6, 2021, thousands of conservatives walked into a lawfare trap used to destroy them and make them an example to any other Republicans who want to get uppity into the future… The demonstration was not an insurrection. The insurrection hoax was used to begin a purge of Trump supporters from the military and from public life… the subversives purged their enemies by means of … luring them into a government building. It worked: a revolt against a largely law-abiding and nonviolent group of patriotic citizens and influencers on the American right had begun… The locking up of patriots was always the goal… President Trump possibly saw it for what it was and had preauthorized 10,000 National Guard troops to maintain law and order…” (Pg. 194-195)
They propose: “What else can be done to turn the tide? … the Iron Law of Exact Reciprocity. Eye-for-an-eye protects innocent eyes from future assault. So this is what the great men of our time can do: A humiliation tactic---naming and shaming… What we need are lists. Turning Point USA publishes … dossiers on college and university staff known to ‘discriminate against conservative students, promote anti-American values and advance leftist propaganda in the classroom.’… McCarthy made beloved Americans total industry outcasts in an instant with exposés of their secret subversive activities… in education but also in media, throughout the economy, and more… Whichever organizations and influencers across the social terrain are engaging in microrevolution against normal people, put them on the list. Then, publish that list. Then promote it. Advertise the counterrevolutions… Reciprocal lawfare must be a response to the lawfare experienced now in the United State and the Collective West. There will be no stopping of it until this occurs.” (Pg. 212-214)
They add, “Consider the power of a legal subpoena. These cost organizations thousands of dollars in legal bills just to respond to… Attorney generals in red districts could easily be going after Antifa, BLM or the arrant of Soros-affiliated NGOs. RICO lawsuits could easily be brought as well… Organized boycotts are another tool for cultural counterrevolution… Which brings us to our biggest ask of all… a National Tax Transparency Act. This new law… will allow for the permanent visibility of the citizenry as to the spending of their federal taxes down to the last dollar.” (Pg. 214-216)
This disturbing book is ‘long’ on rhetorical excess, and ‘short’ on reasoned argument and evidence. It is noteworthy that Senator J.D. Vance---currently Trump’s selection for Vice-President---as well as Donald Trump Jr. wrote endorsements of this book for the back cover… are about 50% of 'unhuman' Americans soon to be added to this proposed ‘Enemies List’?
Authors Jack Posobiec and Joshua Lisec wrote in the Introduction to this 2024 book, “This is not a book about communist ideology… This is a book about the communist reality---and how to tell when it’s coming to a society near you… For as long as there have been beauty and truth, love and life, there have also been the ugly liars who hate and kill… Civilization is the superstructure built on law and order that keeps the petty, the resentful, and the cruel away from the rest of us. Some societies are better at this than others. Those who fail at repelling the repulsive fall to unhumanity---to a state of affairs in which human thriving is impossible and surviving improbable. It doesn’t matter what you call the people of anti-civilization. They will change their name, shape, and form as needed… For the purposes of this book, we will call them ‘unhumans’… With power, unhumans undo civilization itself… By becoming consumed by nihilism, unhumans oppose everything that makes up humanity… It all begins with a wedge between two identifiable groups in a given society—the haves, and the have-nots, which they prefer to call the oppressor and the oppressed… They don’t even want equality. They just want an excuse to destroy everything. They want an excuse to destroy you.” (Pg. xiii-xiv)
They state in Chapter 1, “As we write this, law and order has been overturned. The prevailing order is in disarray… In twenty-first century America, accusations are now evidence; denial is guilt. Activism means open bigotry and actual hate---as long as it’s directed at certain unpopular people and ‘privileged’ groups… Speak louder and unleash a ravenous appetite for vengeance---to deplatform you, debank your family, and destroy your good name. No prospects for work, bank accounts closed or seized, and reputation in ruin. This is what they do.” (Pg. 3)
They continue, “This book is also the story of a playbook. A playbook that every far-left uprising, insurrection, and usurpation of order, goodwill, and freedom follows, and what has been done to fight back, for good or for loss… We have a vested interest in this subject. We, your humble authors… are both fathers. Husbands. Businessmen. Investors in the future… We believe in the God-given will of the human spirit to build a greater, better world than the one we found ourselves in… There is only one force powerful enough to bring us to this point and beyond: the force of anti-civilization. Unhumanity.” (Pg. 4-5)
They contrast modern progressives with historical situations, namely: The French and Haitian Revolutions; the Russian Revolution; the Spanish Civil War; the Chinese Civil War; America’s 1960s Revolution and Culture War, etc. (Pg. 5-6)
They begin Chapter 2, “Conservative authors and pundits have been writing about the left for forty-five plus years. And for forty-five years, the United States … [has] moved to the Left. Why is this? Our thesis is that the conservative movement has failed to conserve anything worth conserving. This is why we are in the situation we currently find ourselves in, and it is in fact a state of learned helplessness.” (Pg. 7)
They continue, “Unhumans STILL support communism after it killed 100 million people in the twentieth century… And yet, conservatives would rather whine about equal treatment while unhumans are drawing them toward freshly dug graves. Unhumans live to persecute the normal, once they take power. Anyone who calls them out … [is] humiliated, unpersoned.’” (Pg. 9)
However, they have some proposals for action: Let them [the unhumans] eat themselves; find the Great Men of History; Win before fighting. They suggest, “We, the normal people, can band together, take united and decisive action, and nip revolution in the bud. WE can win before fighting---as long as we understand that a fight IS coming.” (Pg. 57-59)
They observe, “Perhaps the next time there is a Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek, we will rally around him, give him everything he needs, and crush the revolution before it can even occur. Perhaps. Of the unhumans will seize everything, purge the past, and eat the rich---literally. This is what they do.” (Pg. 136)
They note, “The ‘60s didn’t happen without legitimate grievance driving great and necessary change. People wanted to abolish Jim Crow---an understandable desire, considering how much pain and suffering legalized racial discrimination and ‘separate but equal’ segregation caused. But as the decade wore on, many young radicals got angry that sweeping away Jim Crow laws in 1964 did not immediately eradicate all causes (or consequences) of their grievances. And there youths were gathered, they made their voices heard. That was the college campus… Fast-forward to today. Every college had two, three, or even ten of these fake departments running grievance studies courses that actively DISPREPARE students for productive careers and meaningful lives in the modern world.” (Pg. 144-145)
They go on, “Equal treatment under the law is good. Actual color-blindness under the law is a goal that should be championed… As a civilization, we were already well underway in the accomplishment of that vision by the 1960s, a vision that is a thoroughly Christian one… But as progress continued into the 1960s, we began to see radicals turn reactionary---and stir up violent and ANTIPROGRESS through Cultural Marxism.” (Pg. 147-148)
They assert, “The terrible truth is that there is a distinct and revolutionary movement we are all witnessing in the modern-day West, one directly and indirectly responsible for all that demoralizing and demeaning. And yet it’s different from previous uprisings in visibility, publicity, and intensity. It is a revolution nonetheless and follows the same arc as every unhuman story does. It is: The Irregular Communist Revolution… Specifically, the Irregular Communist Revolution in the late-state republic West is a Cultural Marxist revolution---the targets are social and cultural, not economic.” (Pg. 192-193)
They contend, “After watching radical mobs burn and loot without consequence in the summer of 2020, supporters of then-President Donald J. Trump thought they would freely protest what in their view was a sketchy election result… these well-meaning patriots believed they could and should speak truth to power on power’s home turf---the US Capitol. On January 6, 2021, thousands of conservatives walked into a lawfare trap used to destroy them and make them an example to any other Republicans who want to get uppity into the future… The demonstration was not an insurrection. The insurrection hoax was used to begin a purge of Trump supporters from the military and from public life… the subversives purged their enemies by means of … luring them into a government building. It worked: a revolt against a largely law-abiding and nonviolent group of patriotic citizens and influencers on the American right had begun… The locking up of patriots was always the goal… President Trump possibly saw it for what it was and had preauthorized 10,000 National Guard troops to maintain law and order…” (Pg. 194-195)
They propose: “What else can be done to turn the tide? … the Iron Law of Exact Reciprocity. Eye-for-an-eye protects innocent eyes from future assault. So this is what the great men of our time can do: A humiliation tactic---naming and shaming… What we need are lists. Turning Point USA publishes … dossiers on college and university staff known to ‘discriminate against conservative students, promote anti-American values and advance leftist propaganda in the classroom.’… McCarthy made beloved Americans total industry outcasts in an instant with exposés of their secret subversive activities… in education but also in media, throughout the economy, and more… Whichever organizations and influencers across the social terrain are engaging in microrevolution against normal people, put them on the list. Then, publish that list. Then promote it. Advertise the counterrevolutions… Reciprocal lawfare must be a response to the lawfare experienced now in the United State and the Collective West. There will be no stopping of it until this occurs.” (Pg. 212-214)
They add, “Consider the power of a legal subpoena. These cost organizations thousands of dollars in legal bills just to respond to… Attorney generals in red districts could easily be going after Antifa, BLM or the arrant of Soros-affiliated NGOs. RICO lawsuits could easily be brought as well… Organized boycotts are another tool for cultural counterrevolution… Which brings us to our biggest ask of all… a National Tax Transparency Act. This new law… will allow for the permanent visibility of the citizenry as to the spending of their federal taxes down to the last dollar.” (Pg. 214-216)
This disturbing book is ‘long’ on rhetorical excess, and ‘short’ on reasoned argument and evidence. It is noteworthy that Senator J.D. Vance---currently Trump’s selection for Vice-President---as well as Donald Trump Jr. wrote endorsements of this book for the back cover… are about 50% of 'unhuman' Americans soon to be added to this proposed ‘Enemies List’?
August 23, 2024
A sensational and well written book on the history of communist revolutions . Can it happen here in the USA? It absolutely can happen here. In fact we are on the precipice! Mr. Posobiec and Lisec are giving us due warning. We would be very wise to heed their warning .
February 26, 2025
Utter garbage
An upside-down, funhouse mirror version of history that reads like an extended informercial for authoritarian nationalists. But hey, there’s a market for everything.
An upside-down, funhouse mirror version of history that reads like an extended informercial for authoritarian nationalists. But hey, there’s a market for everything.
July 21, 2024
This book offers a solid introduction to the historical roots of today's insect-inspired populist egalitarian ideology, known for its anti-human tendencies that dominate certain developed countries. The commentary from Lisec and Poso is both accessible and engaging.
The intellectual journey kicks off with the events of the George Floyd summer and occasionally dives into the psychology of leftism, which is inherently resentful and leads to grotesque distortions in the minds of the populace.
A big part of the narrative recounts historical events like the Chinese Cultural Revolution and the Russian Civil War, highlighting the death toll and horror brought by Communist revolutionaries.
The book's core audience is probably already aware of the idea that Lyndon Johnson's Great Society project and the Civil Rights Act were influenced by communist agents within US academia and the political establishment. These agents, driven by a delusional sense of societal progress and an obsessive commitment to policies they saw as virtuous, also operated in countries like Chile and Rhodesia.
The attempt to portray modern leftists as tactical and methodical, with sophisticated plans, is unconvincing. Comparing them to Lenin and Castro is too flattering; they are more like lords of chaos and impulsive psychopaths without a coherent plan.
The advice on how to counter a leftist uprising is decent, especially if you believe in the Great Man theory.
This book is highly recommended for someone new to conservative thought who needs a guide to the hottest social issues in contemporary US and other Western Countries!
The intellectual journey kicks off with the events of the George Floyd summer and occasionally dives into the psychology of leftism, which is inherently resentful and leads to grotesque distortions in the minds of the populace.
A big part of the narrative recounts historical events like the Chinese Cultural Revolution and the Russian Civil War, highlighting the death toll and horror brought by Communist revolutionaries.
The book's core audience is probably already aware of the idea that Lyndon Johnson's Great Society project and the Civil Rights Act were influenced by communist agents within US academia and the political establishment. These agents, driven by a delusional sense of societal progress and an obsessive commitment to policies they saw as virtuous, also operated in countries like Chile and Rhodesia.
The attempt to portray modern leftists as tactical and methodical, with sophisticated plans, is unconvincing. Comparing them to Lenin and Castro is too flattering; they are more like lords of chaos and impulsive psychopaths without a coherent plan.
The advice on how to counter a leftist uprising is decent, especially if you believe in the Great Man theory.
This book is highly recommended for someone new to conservative thought who needs a guide to the hottest social issues in contemporary US and other Western Countries!
March 4, 2025
I wish I could laugh at this but it is part of a terrifying propaganda machine that will pull us into f@cism. This is a playbook that dehumanizes the people 47 and the far-right Christian nationalists will use to dehumanize, disenfranchise and eventually murder anyone that disagrees with in his quest for absolute power. This should terrify everyone. The author is advising our government, DOD and military right now! This book was praised in print by JD Vance why don’t people wake up!!!? Democracy is falling in this country. No one is coming to save us. We must save ourselves.
July 22, 2024
prescient read
This is a must read for all Americans concerned for our great country. It explains what happens when communists gain control of a nation, and delivers a road map on how to fight back against it. Very eye opening.
This is a must read for all Americans concerned for our great country. It explains what happens when communists gain control of a nation, and delivers a road map on how to fight back against it. Very eye opening.
August 16, 2024
Really good
This book is a really good read it really goes over how the cultural Marxist or Marxist have taken over many of our institutions and also lays out a plan on how to attack it and get the Communist back under the rock where they belong.
This book is a really good read it really goes over how the cultural Marxist or Marxist have taken over many of our institutions and also lays out a plan on how to attack it and get the Communist back under the rock where they belong.
August 18, 2024
Stop the Communist revolution
Superb survey of Communism. The authors give a brief but excellent overview of communism and draw parallels to current events. If you want to save America, read this book.
Superb survey of Communism. The authors give a brief but excellent overview of communism and draw parallels to current events. If you want to save America, read this book.
October 22, 2024
This book is horribly disturbing. I only read the beginning, and I thought that I would try to go back and read more, but life is just too short to get this kind of darkness into one's soul. I'm visibly repulsed.
August 25, 2024
Excellent. A must-read book of 2024.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 93 reviews