What do you think?
Rate this book
380 pages, Paperback
First published May 2, 2018
If police and other sources are to be believed, the Naxalites, with the help of Dalit youths and the Islamist terrorist group Indian Mujahedeen (IM), want to have their own government in the country by 2025. The revolution will emerge from the conflict of Hindus on one side and Dalits and Muslims on another. Two consolidated rebellious, energetic forces pumped with raw adrenaline, will go for each other’s blood. And then it will be opportune to hijack and change the narrative to oppressed, proletariat, and marginalized vs bourgeoisie, elites, and Brahmins. This attracts poor and intellectuals both. In this case, the Adivasi, Dalits, Muslims, and other “forgotten people”, united under one common red flag, will demolish the State. That’s the ambition. And they also have a plan.
Nehru judged history and filtered it to what should be told to an independent India and what should be hidden. He made sure that the history reinforced his ideology and made him look like a hero. His daughter Indira Gandhi and later her daughter-in-law Sonia Gandhi tuned our history to further their political agendas. In independent India, only a certain kind of narrative is allowed; the one that suits the ruler's agenda.
Another reason for such high concentration of intelligentsia [in Delhi] is that all central research and policy agencies are here and these agencies were used by the Congress government to employ intellectuals and use them to give an ideological endorsement to their political narrative. Since Sonia Gandhi's politics align with the left, it is but natural that most of these people are Naxal sympathizers.
There are no Zamindars today, so who are they fighting in the tribal areas? Why is it that after four decades of struggle, neither have the rebels achieved their objective nor have the tribals been empowered? Why is the government not being able to stop this oppression? Where do they get money from? Are all those intellectuals who openly support the Naxal movement on national TV, righteous people? What is in it for them? This is a movement being fought in jungles inhabited by wild animals, snakes and, the tribals– is it possible for it to survive for so long? That too without financial, intelligence, strategic, and logistical support? It's impossible for a movement to survive for so long only on good intentions. So, who are the masterminds?
An invisible enemy is the most dangerous of all. Like a snake under your bed. I shiver imagining that someone in my ecosystem – a writer, a lawyer, a journalist, a social worker, an officer, a professor, a historian, a painter, a filmmaker, anyone just anyone can be an Urban Naxal. What if?
I have no doubt in my mind that Naxalism is the biggest threat to India, bigger than Pakistan and China. Such links are not possible to maintain from the jungles of Dantewada. Where is their strategic hub? All the research points to Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) as the most active urban Naxal centre. Some of the organizations in Delhi that are under the scanner are the Revolutionary Democratic Front (RDF), Committee for Release of Political Prisoners, Democratic Students Union, Nari Mukti Sangh, People Democratic Front of India, and Mehantkash Mazdoor Morcha. Many of their members are said to be active in towns adjoining Delhi like Gurgaon and Ghaziabad.
I distinctly remember as I was leaving his house, a few students from different colleges were collecting outside in the lawns of his government quarter for chaupal - a forum for an exchange of ideas. Many years later, I learnt that some of them were arrested in the tribal villages of Chhattisgarh, on the charge of spreading Naxal ideology. I could have been one of them.
They work with feminist groups, atheist groups, anti-superstition movements, intellectuals, students, labourers, slum groups, farmers, journalists, competitive exam centres etc. They take up genuine issues with the aim not to solve it but to create unrest and anger against the system and make people believe in armed struggle. This is how the 'vulnerable group' unknowingly becomes their vanguard.
An education system rooted in the principles of utopian socialism, courtesy Nehru's fascination for the same, and the professors, enamoured of the Nehruvian dream, were feeding the young minds to wage a war against India.
The people who work as their mouthpieces also know very well but they succeed in spreading the lie as they have been controlling the narrative. We broke into it, challenged it and tried to introduce a new narrative.
Secularism was nothing but a ploy to attract Muslim votes and keep a control on Hindus from asserting themselves.
I won’t go into the details of Kanhaiya’s speech as it’s a function of his political agenda, but I’d request him not to mention Manu Smriti without studying and understanding it. Manu Smriti doesn’t speak of the “caste system.” It talks of Varnas. Varna is not caste. Nor was “Manu Smriti” a “law book” enforced by the State. Hardly anyone reads the Manu Smriti in popular Hinduism.
I am sure our rishis wrote the eternal truth in the Rigveda, ‘Tatvam asi,’—Thou art that—while meditating on such uninterrupted landscapes.
The India that we are talking about here is not the India that won her independence from the British in 1947 but the one that has existed for thousands of years. Be it Chandragupta Maurya who along with Chanakya tried to form a unified India or Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj who did the same against a different resisting force. India is not a modern concept but an age-old belief that has been passed on to us over the generations. It is not merely an idea but a reality that has existed well before any other civilization.
‘This fight is not between the left and the right, neither is it a fight between Sanghis and Laal Salaam; this fight is between those who want to make India better and those who want to break India.