This book has a slightly different take on the same events that are discussed in other R.E.M. books, usually a more cynical take on them. It's odd that after so many books reporting the facts one way, this book is the lone one to see the same events from a different angle.
One thing I don't like, and maybe it's just me being extremely picky or touchy, is that the authors seem to give their opinion often, like implying a particular album or song isn't good, or won't stand the test of time. Isn't that a matter of opinion? Just because you didn't like Lifes Rich Pageant doesn't mean it's not someone else's favorite (R.E.M.) album of all time, the one they go back to over and over. hmm...
I dunno what's worse, the fact that you get the feeling the writer didn't like the band, the constant mispellings, incorrect titles for songs, or the fact that it's comprised entirely of quotes from interviews from other sources. I can't believe I read the whole thing.
This is the same book as R.E.M.: From Chronic Town to Monster -- same pictures in the middle, same text, same chapters, even the same layout and page numbers. Darn those authors or publishing companies who published the same book with two different titles!