This book offers a fresh insight into the conquests of Alexander the Great by attempting to view the events of 336-323 BCE from the vantage point of the defeated. The extent and form of the resistance of the populations he confronted varied according to their previous relationships with either the Macedonian invaders or their own Achaemenid rulers. The internal political situations of many states―particularly the Greek cities of Asia Minor―were also a factor. In the vast Persian Empire that stretched from the Aegean to the Indus, some states surrendered voluntarily and others offered fierce resistance. Not all regions were subdued through military actions. Indeed, as the author argues, the excessive use of force on Alexander's part was often ineffective and counterproductive.
In the Path of Conquest examines the reasons for these varied responses, giving more emphasis to the defeated and less to the conqueror and his Macedonian army. In the process, it debunks many long-held views concerning Alexander's motives, including the idea that his aim was to march to the eastern limits of the world. It also provides a fresh reevaluation of Darius III's successes and failures as a commander. Such a study involves rigorous analysis of the ancient sources, and their testimony is presented throughout the book in the form of newly translated passages. A unique portrait of a well-known age, In the Path of Conquest will significantly alter our understanding of Alexander's career.
در راه فتح کتابی ایست از والدمار هکل، استاد باستانشناسی و مورخ کانادایی . او در این کتاب تلاش کرده به بررسی مقاومتها و مخالفتهایی بپردازد که اسکندر در مسیر فتوحات خود با آنها روبرو شد. هکل این گونه کوشیده نگاهی تازه و دقیق هم به وقایع پرشمار تاریخی و هم شخصیت اسکندر ، انداخته و این گونه خواننده را با دوران او بیشتر آشنا کند . هکل با بررسی انواع مختلف مقاومت، از جمله مقاومتهای نظامی، سیاسی و فرهنگی، نشان میدهد که اسکندر در مسیر فتحهایش با مخالفتهای جدی روبرو بود که بر استراتژیها و تصمیمات او تأثیرگذار بوده. بنابراین کتاب او کمتر بر پیروزی ها و شکوه و عظمت اسکندر متمرکز است، او تلاش کرده تا مقاومتها و شکستهایی که اسکندر ( گرچه تعداد آن بسیار اندک بوده ) در مسیر فتوحات خود با آنها روبرو شد را هم بیان کند . کتاب هکل ، گرچه زندگی نامه اسکندر نیست ، اما بیشتر زندگی او هنگام جوانی ، تا متحد کردن یونان و مقدونیه ، حمله به آسیا ، امپراتوری هخامنشی و هندوستان ، قصد بازگشت به وطن و مرگ در راه را شامل شده . نویسنده فتوحات بسیار اسکندر و نقشه های متنوع جنگی او و در مقابل تلاش برای متوقف کردن ماشین جنگی کار آزموده او که البته بیشتر به شکست هم انجامیده را به اختصار بیان کرده . بزرگترین مشکل کتاب را باید نداشتن پانویس و توضیحات دانست . از آن جا که نام های قدیمی و باستانی شهرها و مناطق در کتاب ذکر شده ، نویسنده یا مترجم هیچ توضیحی در مورد این که این منطقه امروزه کجاست ، نداده است . این گونه درک خواننده از موقعیت جغرافیایی رویدادها را با دشواری مواجه شده و باعث میشود که خواننده نتواند به راحتی ارتباط بین رویدادهای تاریخی و مکانهای جغرافیایی را درک کند . نسخه فارسی ،کتاب هکل ، افزون بر نداشتن پانویس ، فهرست منابع هم ندارد . از آن جا که بسیار بعید است ، یک مورخ سرشناس ، کتاب را بدون رفرنس و فهرست منابع بنویسد ، میتوان نتیجه گرفت که نشر ماهی به دلایل تجاری، احتمالاً برای کاهش هزینههای چاپ و قیمت تمامشده کتاب، از چاپ رفرنسها خودداری کرده است در حالی که قراردادن یک کیو آر کد و اسکن آن از جانب خواننده، میتوانست به سادگی این ضعف بزرگ را جبران کند . در پایان ، کتاب هکل یا آن چه از کتاب او باقی مانده ، تلاش ناموفقی ایست برای ترسیم چهره ای دیگر از اسکندر .
A really interesting premise that I was excited to read but the project doesn’t feel successful. It doesn’t discuss any of the cultures conquered by Alexander according to their own contexts, makes very little effort to educate the reader on them. And given that there are so little extant sources from the perspectives of those conquered—and what little sources are available, as in the case of the Babylonians, are underutilized—the book in no way accurately tells the Alexander story “from their perspective” as it claims to.
What lies behind Alexander the Great's glorious conquests? In this fascinating study, expert historian Waldemar Heckel offers us a little-explored perspective on one of the most memorable episodes of antiquity.
"In the Path of Conquest" immerses us in the vast Persian empire that Alexander swept across, from the Aegean to the Indus. Far from focusing solely on the exploits of the young Macedonian king, Heckel delves into the varied responses of the states and populations that faced his unstoppable advance. Some surrendered without a fight, others put up fierce resistance, and not all regions were subdued by force.
Through a rigorous analysis of ancient sources, Heckel questions preconceived ideas about Alexander's motives, such as the supposed ambition to conquer the ends of the known world. Instead, it shows us a more complex picture, in which excessive use of violence often proved ineffective and even counterproductive.
Far from the heroic and bombastic image, "In the Path of Conquest" reveals a more pragmatic Alexander, whose decisions were strongly influenced by the need to maintain control over his domains. A nuanced and captivating portrait of one of the most fascinating episodes in ancient history.
How things looked from the other side. Plus a refreshing (if at times disturbing) view of Alexander Agread as a homicidal psychopath from an author not inclined to worship at the altar--all those bits startstruck biographers usually omit. If you have not known this already, to conquer an empire you have to be sick in the head--don't feel bad about not making your mark in history.
This was a good solid account of Alexander's conquest. It does a good job of fulfilling it plan by addressing those conquered and separating out the mythology of Alexander.