The extraterrestrials of Logicalard Fallaciod (translates to "logical fallacy") are known for giving credence to theories instead of facts, being unaware of the fact that theories, especially THEIR theories, are more susceptible to logical fallacies. The usage of logically fallacious theorization extends to social concerns, as they were being used to justify racial stereotypes to each of the 4 races of extraterrestrials: the cryo-organisms, the geofus-organisms, the therma-organisms, and the aviator-organisms. The story is meant to create a parallel between the reception of theories instead of facts and logically fallacious stereotyping on Logicalard Fallaciod and on Earth itself.
Ever since elementary school, Lucy Carter has always had a love for writing. Whether it was writing songs full of toilet humor or stories about chickens and magical creatures, Lucy developed a love for creative writing from a young age. Now as a Goodreads author, Lucy is able to accomplish her childhood dreams of being a writer. Admittedly, Lucy is aware that her writing has not always been perfect: when she was in elementary school, the stories she wrote often had outlandish, nonsensical plots, and her earlier posts and publications on this website have been cringey, didactically written, and have (very regrettably) used long words out of context. Nonetheless, Lucy hopes to use this experience to grow in maturity and improve her writing skills. As Lucy continues revising earlier works and embarking on her writing journey, she hopes the writing she contributes is relatable, intellectually enriching, and contributes a positive and meaningful difference in society.
In addition to being an author, Lucy is also the creator of Pseudoscience Prevention, a website intended to educate viewers about various pseudosciences and provides them with strategies to fact-check their beliefs and prevent themselves from internalizing pseudosciences.
LUCY'S RATING SYSTEM (for her book reviews): ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐=Amazing. Nothing to criticize about this book. ⭐⭐⭐⭐=Pretty good. Some minor flaws, but those do not take away from Lucy's overall enjoyment of the book. ⭐⭐⭐=Average or mediocre; good, but not great. Not terrible, but it could have been better. ⭐⭐=Bad but survivable. ⭐=Terrible. There is NOTHING to enjoy about this book. No rating= Opinion is undecided. An undecided opinion can be present for a couple of reasons, so it's best to read the review once it has been posted to learn the cause of an undecided opinion.
This is gibberish. I don't mean that as a literary analysis but as an observation. It's a collection of words mixed together in a nonsensical fashion. I give it 3* because I cannot conclusively price this is AI prompted nonsense but since the author claimed to be a teenager as well I'll just say with high confidence that it is.