Stephen P. Halbrook’s Followers (24)

Stephen P. Halbrook

edit data

Combine Editions
Stephen P. Halbrook’s books

Average rating: 4.15 · 642 ratings · 103 reviews · 36 distinct works • Similar authors

	The Founders' Second Amendment: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms 4.26 avg rating — 139 ratings — published 2008 — 10 editions	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars
	Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and "Enemies of the State" 4.33 avg rating — 134 ratings — published 2013 — 14 editions	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars
	The Swiss & the Nazis: How the Alpine Republic Survived in the Shadow of the Third Reich 3.74 avg rating — 133 ratings — published 2006 — 10 editions	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars
	Target Switzerland: Swiss Armed Neutrality in World War 2 4.05 avg rating — 113 ratings — 20 editions	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars
	That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right (Independent Studies in Political Economy) 4.34 avg rating — 64 ratings — published 1984 — 14 editions	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars
	America's Rifle: The Case for the AR-15 4.61 avg rating — 18 ratings — 5 editions	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars
	The Right to Bear Arms: A Constitutional Right of the People or a Privilege of the Ruling Class? by Stephen P. Halbrook, Renée Lettow Lerner (Foreword) 4.62 avg rating — 13 ratings — published 2021 — 4 editions	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars
	Securing Civil Rights: Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Right to Bear Arms, Updated Edition 4.14 avg rating — 14 ratings — published 1998 — 11 editions	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars
	Gun Control in Nazi-Occupied France: Tyranny and Resistance 4.30 avg rating — 10 ratings — 4 editions	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars
	Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Right to Bear Arms, 1866-1876 it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating	Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

More books by Stephen P. Halbrook…

Quotes by Stephen P. Halbrook (?)

“the Nazis confiscated firearms to prevent armed resistance, whether individual or collective, to their own criminality.”
― Stephen P. Halbrook, Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and Enemies of the State

2 likes

“A vegetarian, the führer was sensitive to the feelings of animals and remarked: “The Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals would do well to turn its attention to the sportsmen themselves.”6 As the war and the Holocaust would prove, he had no such sensitivity to humans.”
― Stephen P. Halbrook, Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and Enemies of the State

1 likes

“Rephrasing the amendment as a conditional (hypothetical) syllogism, its first premise would state: If a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state (p), then the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed (q); that is, p implies q. If one then asserts p as a second premise, then the conclusion q would follow. Logicians speak of this syllogism as being valid by reason of modus ponens.39 Yet the denial of the antecedent, should it be expressed in the second premise, fails to imply the denial of the consequent in the conclusion; that is, even if a militia is not necessary for the existence of a free state, the people still have the right to keep and bear arms. To say that “not p” implies “not q” is to commit the logical fallacy of denying the antecedent.40 These rules concerning syllogisms derive from classic Aristotelian logic and have not changed since ancient Greece. The Founders were familiar with logic.”
― Stephen P. Halbrook, The Founders' Second Amendment: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms

0 likes

See all Stephen P. Halbrook's quotes »

Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Stephen to Goodreads.