Talal Asad
Genre
![]() |
Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity
14 editions
—
published
2003
—
|
|
![]() |
On Suicide Bombing
15 editions
—
published
2007
—
|
|
![]() |
Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam
13 editions
—
published
1993
—
|
|
![]() |
Is Critique Secular?: Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech
by
13 editions
—
published
2013
—
|
|
![]() |
Secular Translations: Nation-State, Modern Self, and Calculative Reason
5 editions
—
published
2018
—
|
|
![]() |
Anthropology & the Colonial Encounter
by
8 editions
—
published
1973
—
|
|
![]() |
The Kababish Arabs: Power, authority and consent in a nomadic tribe
4 editions
—
published
1970
—
|
|
![]() |
Reflections on Blasphemy and Secular Criticism
|
|
![]() |
পাশ্চাত্য ও সেক্যুলারবাদ প্রসঙ্গে
|
|
![]() |
Middle East
by
5 editions
—
published
1983
—
|
|
“The construction of civilizational difference is not exclusive in any simple sense. The de-essentialization of Islam is paradigmatic for all thinking about the assimilation of non-European peoples to European civilization. The idea that people's historical experience is inessential to them, that it can be shed at will, makes it possible to argue more strongly for the Enlightenment's claim to universality: Muslims, as members of the abstract category "humans," can be assimilated or (as some recent theorist have put it) "translated" into a global ("European") civilization once they have divested themselves of what many of them regard (mistakenly) as essential to themselves. The belief that human beings can be separated from their histories and traditions makes it possible to urge a Europeanization of the Islamic world. And by the same logic, it underlies the belief that the assimilation to Europe's civilization of Muslim immigrants who are--for good or for ill--already in European states is necessary and desirable.
”
― Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity
”
― Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity
“The construction of civilizational difference is not exclusive in any simple sense. The de-essentialization of Islam is paradigmatic for all thinking about the assimilation of non-European poeples to European civilization. The idea that people's historical experience is inessential to them, that it can be shed at will, makes it possible to argue more strongly for the Enlightenment's claim to universality: Muslims, as members of the abstract category "humans," can be assimilated or (as some recent theorist have put it) "translated" into a global ("European") civilization once they have divested themselves of what many of them regard (mistakenly) as essential to themselves. The belief that human beings can be separated from their histories and traditions makes it possible to urge a Europeanization of the Islamic world. And by the same logic, it underlies the belief that the assimilation to Europe's civilization of Muslim immigrants who are--for good or for ill--already in European states is necessary and desirable.”
― Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity
― Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity
“Modern sovereignty, whether expressed through killing in battle or the torture of suspects, brings together the desire to build up and the desire to destroy, to let Aid Agencies offer charity (in its original meaning of "love") while the military offers death. The two are intrinsically connected.”
―
―
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Talal to Goodreads.