Storms and how they start

posted by Neil Gaiman

It's been a strange week, filled with odd things happening. Oddest of all, I've bought a house (it is not as this quote might lead you believe, in Sacramento California: that quote was taken from a longer interview with me about my fondness for backing things on Kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/blog/meet-a-backer-neil-gaiman).

The new house is something that's been in the works for a few months now: I saw somewhere in the Autumn, fell in love with it, convinced Amanda that I was in love, and we finally closed on it yesterday afternoon.

It's a lot like my old Addams Family house in the woods, only it's not an Addams Family house, more of little cluster of stone cottages in the woods. (The woman I bought it from had lived here fifty years exactly; the man whose family she and her husband had bought it from in January 1964 drew newspaper comics back in the Golden Age.)

The new house is a couple of hours from New York, and in order to close on it and take possession I unexpectedly (don't ask) found myself driving from Florida to New York State this weekend, via North Carolina (to see Maddy at college), vaguely worried that the snowstorms that have been circumscribing my movements for the last 2 months would have one final go at mucking up my travel plans. A storm was forecast, but it never happened.

I listened to the Best of Nick Lowe, David Bowie's The Next Day, and Simon Vance's Audiobook of Mervyn Peake's Titus Groan as I drove.

Driving meant that I missed a small storm which started on Twitter.

Back in January I got a request from the co-chair of the upcoming Worldcon in London (I don't know him, but he'd been given my email by a friend) asking me to forward an invitation to Jonathan Ross to host the Hugo Awards.

Jonathan is a UK TV and radio presenter, and, these days, a writer of comics. He's also one of the most highly regarded UK awards hosts. He's also become a friend of mine, has been for over 25 years. You can see us here together in the Search for Steve Ditko documentary.  (Here's the last few minutes of the documentary. Keep watching, and you'll see me with a smile big enough to break my face.) He was also the person who talked me onto Twitter in the first place.



I forwarded the invitation, along with a note telling him that hosting the Hugo awards is a really enjoyable thing to do, and got a note back from the chair saying that Jonathan had said yes, and could I put something up welcoming him when they announced it.

Jonathan said yes because he's a huge SF and Comics fan  -- in many ways, one of the most fannish people I know: he also writes SF comics. There's also a family connection: his wife, Jane Goldman, won a Hugo award (for best Screenplay).

It was announced that he would be hosting the Hugos. There was a storm on Twitter. I missed it, but people sent me the link, and it's summarised here: http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/03/01/when-jonathan-ross-was-presenting-the-hugo-awards-until-he-wasnt

I was really glad I was a) on a Twitter sabbatical and b) driving while all this was going on.

The weirdest bit was, I understood some of the worry; I'd had it myself, 25 years ago, when Jonathan and I had first met, and he asked me and Dave McKean to be on his chat show to talk about VIOLENT CASES. I said "No, you make fun of people. This is comics. It matters to me. I don't want you making fun of it."

To convince me that he a) didn't make fun of people on his show and b) that he would never ever under any circumstances mock the comics and comics creators he loved, Jonathan asked Dave McKean and me to come to the recording of the show: he was interviewing writer/artist Charles Burns that night. The interview was respectful and incredibly nice.

We never did that interview, although he's interviewed me a few times since over the years, in various different contexts. (When The Wolves in the Walls came out, Jonathan interviewed me and Dave McKean in front of a crowd of adults and kids. His interview was perfectly appropriate for the audience...)  He's embarrassed me gloriously presenting the Eisner Awards.

I wasn't surprised that some people were upset by the choice of Jonathan as a host: as the convention says in their apology for their handling of this, and their apology to Jonathan and his family, at https://www.facebook.com/londonin2014/posts/804454159569536, they should have consulted better within their ranks, talked to their committees and so on, and made sure that that everyone was agreed that they wanted Jonathan as their host before they wrote to me and asked me to invite him.

If they'd known ahead of time that some people were going to have a problem with him as a choice of presenter (and I strongly suspect they did, given that one of their number had apparently resigned), they should have warned him and given him the option to withdraw, and at least prepared him. As it was, he and his family didn't know what hit them.

Twitterstorms are no fun when people are making up things about you or insulting you for things you didn't do or think or say. When scores of people from a group that you consider yourself a part of are shouting at you, it's incredibly upsetting, no matter who you are.

I was seriously disappointed in the people, some of whom I know and respect, who stirred other people up to send invective, obscenities and hatred Jonathan's way over Twitter (and the moment you put someone's @name into a tweet, you are sending it to that person), much of it the kind of stuff that they seemed to be worried that he might possibly say at the Hugos, unaware of the ironies involved.

I sympathise with anyone who felt that Jonathan wasn't going to make an appropriate Hugos host, and with anyone who spoke about it to the convention committee, but do not believe a campaign aimed at vilifying Jonathan personally was wise or kind. And for those who thought that making this happen was a way to avoid SF and the Hugos appearing in the tabloids, I'd point to the Streisand effect, with a shake of the head.

I have won Hugo Awards, and I am incredibly proud of all of them; I've hosted the Hugo Awards ceremony, and I was honoured to have been permitted to be part of that tradition; I know that SF is a family, and like all families, has disagreements, fallings out. I've been going to Worldcons since 1987. And I know that these things heal in time.

But I've taken off the Hugo nominee pin that I've worn proudly on my lapel since my Doctor Who episode, The Doctor's Wife, won the Hugo in September 2012, and, for now, I've put it away.











Labels:  Hugo Awards, Jonathan Ross, the dangers of Twitter, Storms, Being Kind

Share on Twitter   Share on Facebook   Share on Tumblr   Pin it on Pinterest   Share on Google+
27 likes ·   •  17 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 05, 2014 19:04
Comments Showing 1-17 of 17 (17 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by NobleGoblin (new)

NobleGoblin Congratulations on your new house!

It's sad to hear about Johnathan Ross. I supported him hosting the Hugo awards and things like this are a big reason as to why I dropped twitter entirely.

The masses always seem to forget that there are no saints anymore. No one is perfectly "politically correct."

I don't say that to excuse him for anything offensive he may have done, nor to downplay anyone's feelings, but to reiterate that we are all still very human and full of errors.

-M

(P.S. I'm reading the Authors Preferred Text of American Gods and it is fantastic. The Ifrit (surprisingly enough) is thus far my favorite part.)


message 2: by Nicole (new)

Nicole It shows how narrow-minded people can be and how many are a little bit too eager to let the world know immediately via Twitter when somethings bothering them. Thinking and Tweeting at the same time seems a bit much for some to handle.


message 3: by Susie (new)

Susie I like Jonathan Ross. Yes, he's made mistakes, but who hasn't? It seems that the modern age has left things far too open, with people too easily able to target and attack others on a whim with little thought of the actual impact or the fact that they're targeting an actual person. So easy behind a screen. The age of trolling is the most despicable one.


message 4: by Phillippa (new)

Phillippa Silverlock This is why i don't have a twitter account. I doubt I would be able to have much faith in the world and the human condition if I did.


message 5: by [deleted user] (new)

Trolls are the scum of the internet. Sad, sad, sad.


message 6: by Judith (new)

Judith There are always bullies in the world and technology has just given them the means to try to push around a larger group of people. The more we talk about them the more we are giving them a venue for their negativity. So...Neil...glad you found a house you seem to love. Hope it brings you joy.


message 7: by Serra (new)

Serra One thing about twitter(and its ilk) is that, yes, the "twitter storms" are full of suck and hurt and stupid people trying to be clever and failing. However, give it three months (probably less) and no one will remember it or even care. The problem with Twitter et al is that it makes thing seem urgent and makes it seem like immediate action is needed, and so other people react to it and often don't make well thought out decisions. The reality is, 1) twitter is just so much noise and 2) in about 48 hours people will have moved on to whatever the next twitter storm is going to be.

I'm sorry your friend got caught in the middle of this particular storm and I'm sorry the Hugo's made a bad call overall. However, let not give more weight to Twitter than what it's earned.


message 8: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Strayer Good for you for standing by your friend. There is not enough free publicity in the world that could compel me to have an active Twitter account. Its like forcing you to Google yourself; sometimes you really just don't want to know!


message 9: by Carys (new)

Carys I don't understand this whole "controversy" - the guy is a comedian - you can't take him seriously - surely people know that?


message 10: by Bob (new)

Bob This would be a good time to google "Song for Wossy" by Tim Minchin.


message 11: by Cherbear (new)

Cherbear Fantabulous! Congrats on the new house. Tons of fun. Its a shame how people treat others. Its true, it will be forgotten. People only remember things that are repeated over and over and over, short attention spans.


message 12: by Carol (new)

Carol I love how you write your thoughts. So proud you found a house to be in love with and miracle of miracles, to be able to purchase it. Hey, it might not have been for sale, what a tragedy that would have been.
Even in my small town I have seen these storms crop up on facebook and it is sad to see folks just gang up on somebody or some idea when they haven't taken the time to check things out. Good going, kind Sir.


message 13: by Judith-Victoria (last edited Mar 08, 2014 10:16AM) (new)

Judith-Victoria Douglas Congrats on the new house, Neil. Sounds lovely. Would love to see pictures, as you often share part of your life in pictures.
Don't know about the controversy, but I do have a problem with trolls and twitter. Having a psychology background I understand trolls better than they understand themselves, but they would never accept what I think or say about them. I only know the world would be a better place without their activity, and any activity in their lives that created them in the first place.
I don't understand twitter. Everything posted on my twitter site comes from my Facebook site where it was first posted. I get so many emails from twitter about new followers that I have quit following back, and I have no idea how to respond to the emails telling me someone has responded to a posting or made a comment where I'm mentioned. Too frustrating to waste time figuring it out.
I do find it interesting when the two things, trolls and twitter, come together. I have to assume it's a troll comment anyway when I get a notice and go to it, but the account has been suspended. Well, that could be good for the rest of us no matter who suspended it, twitter or the individual.
It's always sad to feel the need to drop out of something you felt honored to be a part of. So sorry for your removal of the pin. It must be a very sad day for you. It should also be a sad day for those on the Hugo committee. They have lost more than they know.
Now smile. It ain't always all bad. Things will work out. It usually does. You may never put the pin back on, but there may be another you will enjoy being part of even more. Some people will disappoint us, but there are always good guys in the world who are often overlooked.


message 14: by Susie (new)

Susie Judith-Victoria wrote: "Don't know about the controversy, but I do have a problem with trolls and twitter. Having a psychology background I understand trolls better than they understand themselves, but they would never accept what I think or say about them. I only know the world would be a better place without their activity, and any activity in their lives that created them in the first place."

Trolls are all over the place, not just on Twitter. But one thing seems unites them wherever they are - denial. No one likes being classed a cyberbully and people will go out of their way to deny it, even though they wouldn't use such demeaning comments if they were face to face with the same person.


message 15: by Judith-Victoria (new)

Judith-Victoria Douglas Susie wrote: "Judith-Victoria wrote: "Don't know about the controversy, but I do have a problem with trolls and twitter. Having a psychology background I understand trolls better than they understand themselves,..."

Didn't mean to imply trolls and twitter together, but as separate entities I have a problem with. Sorry for not being clearer.


message 16: by Susie (new)

Susie Judith-Victoria wrote: "Didn't mean to imply trolls and twitter together, but as separate entities I have a problem with. Sorry for not being clearer."

No, I know, but I've been reading a lot of things recently that have been arguing the point of what is and isn't bullying! It was just another one of many...! ;)

Twitter can be a fun place at times, if you can keep up. Where else in the world can you see celebrities conversing with each other? It makes the world seem small and those that you admire become normal and reachable.

But, as you said, it still does have its darker side...


message 17: by K. (new)

K.  Bernard Jonathan Ross was going to be the host/presenter at the Hugo Awards that world have been great but social media is so sad taking things rumors and running with it. But... Congrats on the new house.


back to top