From the Bookshelf of Reading the Detectives…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
*
VOTE NOW for November 2025 group read!
By Judy · 19 posts · 24 views
By Judy · 19 posts · 24 views
last updated Sep 07, 2025 01:29AM
*
Sept 25: Lonesome Road (#3 Miss Silver Mysteries) by Patricia Wentworth
By Susan · 13 posts · 12 views
By Susan · 13 posts · 12 views
last updated Sep 03, 2025 12:03PM
showing 3 of 3 topics
view all »
Other topics mentioning this book

By Judy · 873 posts · 160 views
last updated Jan 08, 2023 08:15PM
What mysteries are you reading at the moment? (2023)
By Judy · 618 posts · 140 views
By Judy · 618 posts · 140 views
last updated Jan 05, 2024 02:48AM
What Members Thought

3.5 stars - Lorac is one of my favorite Golden Age mystery writers, discovered through the Reading the Detectives group, and I’ve read and enjoyed several of her reissued books, but this wasn’t a favorite. Number 12 in the Inspector Macdonald (of Scotland Yard) series, originally published in 1937, but each case stands alone, and the books don’t have to be read in order (thank goodness, as she was quite productive, and the books are being reissued randomly).
In this outing, Macdonald is invited t ...more
In this outing, Macdonald is invited t ...more

This is the first disappointing book I've read by this author. To many characters with too many names, a pleasant but bland detective, and a convoluted plot add up to a mystery that doesn't work for me. The only truly interesting character was Susan, and she didn't figure into the story very much. The journalist who had a major part at the end was good, too, but again a small part of the story; plus he seemed to come out of nowhere.
If you like pure puzzle mysteries this may please you, but for m ...more
If you like pure puzzle mysteries this may please you, but for m ...more

Published in 1937, this is one of a long-running series feauturing Chief Inspector Robert MacDonald. In this outing, he is invited to a 'Treasure Hunt' run by Graham Coombe and his sister, Susan. The idea is that a group of writers, some thriller writers, others historians and economists, plus MacDonald, and a reader, are to be given literary pseudonyms and pit their wits against each other. Of course, during the evening, as MacDonald races on with his clues, eager to win, the lights go out and
...more

I found it enjoyable. And didn't catch on to it.
A publisher holds a treasure hunt party and invites people that he thinks do not know each other, mostly writers and one detective inspector. He had met the inspector shortly before the party in a restaurant by chance and heard him expound on literary mysteries and their authors. At least 4 of the authors are mystery/crime writers. I think the other four are some form of non-fiction - an economist, an historian, not sure about the others. Everyone ...more
A publisher holds a treasure hunt party and invites people that he thinks do not know each other, mostly writers and one detective inspector. He had met the inspector shortly before the party in a restaurant by chance and heard him expound on literary mysteries and their authors. At least 4 of the authors are mystery/crime writers. I think the other four are some form of non-fiction - an economist, an historian, not sure about the others. Everyone ...more

This is a Golden Age mystery steroid: a whodunit that not always plays fair but plays hard hiding clued in word playing.
It's also an entertaining description of the world of writers and publishing during the 30s.
It wasn't always easy to read as it was a mind game that requested to remember who-said-what.
There's plenty of twists and a couple of huge surprises.
Even if it's not my favorite Lorac's mystery it was riveting and I read it in one sitting.
4.5 upped to 5
Highly recommended if you are a fan ...more
It's also an entertaining description of the world of writers and publishing during the 30s.
It wasn't always easy to read as it was a mind game that requested to remember who-said-what.
There's plenty of twists and a couple of huge surprises.
Even if it's not my favorite Lorac's mystery it was riveting and I read it in one sitting.
4.5 upped to 5
Highly recommended if you are a fan ...more

3 1/2. It could be a little confusing with the many characters and multiple names, but I ultimately quite enjoyed it.

Jan 21, 2024
Christine PNW
rated it
really liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
library-borrows-2024,
2024
I'm going to have to read more from Lorac. I've enjoyed everything of hers that I have read.
...more

Great start, good characters but overall, what a mess. Introducing people using pseudonyms and later real names, so everyone has two names - awful, leaving no discernible clues bar red herrings - annoying, barely any Inspector MacDonald therefore leaving the reader out of the detection process - renders story pointless. I’ve read later of her books with the same detective that I really enjoyed. This would have been better left on the ‘not to be reprinted’ shelf (Audiobook, which made the name cl
...more

Mar 11, 2023
Laura Anne
rated it
liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
mystery,
british-isles
A treasure hunt house-party that turns deadly. A really fun set up, but not Lorac’s best. Lots of pseudonyms, distractions, and multiple characters playing detective; cutting a few characters would have tightened the story.

Dec 18, 2021
Shabbeer Hassan
marked it as to-read

Oct 26, 2022
Mary
marked it as to-read

Nov 17, 2022
Neil Clark
added it

Jan 05, 2023
Jackie
marked it as to-read



Mar 08, 2024
Reoma McGinnis
marked it as to-read

Mar 31, 2024
Lekeshua
marked it as to-read