From the Bookshelf of Atheists and Skeptics…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
No group discussions for this book yet.
What Members Thought

I agree with other reviewers that there are no new or surprising arguments here. He goes over ground which is thoroughly familiar to those who think critically of religion. What makes the book so worthwhile is not, therefore, any (ahem) great revelations.
What I found thrilling about this book, as an atheist of 50 years, was the startling, forceful simplicity, directness, beauty, and artistry with which he made his points. Consider one quote: "If the Bible is an ordinary book, and Christ an ordin ...more
What I found thrilling about this book, as an atheist of 50 years, was the startling, forceful simplicity, directness, beauty, and artistry with which he made his points. Consider one quote: "If the Bible is an ordinary book, and Christ an ordin ...more

In his later work, Letter to a Christian Nation, Harris takes up Christianity and the Bible directly. It is notable, however, that Harris never discusses Christians or the “Christian world” with the same language that he directs against Muslims.
There is an incredible level of dishonesty involved here. Even if one were to accept Harris’ premises—that it is primarily religions belief that is responsible for acts of violence—one must, if looking at the situation objectively, conclude that the most ...more
There is an incredible level of dishonesty involved here. Even if one were to accept Harris’ premises—that it is primarily religions belief that is responsible for acts of violence—one must, if looking at the situation objectively, conclude that the most ...more

An exceptional critique of religion in general and Christianity in particular. At points Harris can really be biting, but he is never petty. When critics complain of him being "shrill", what they are alluding to are very direct and effective arguments that cut to the core of religious faith. Harris simply does not give permission to believe in things for which there is no evidence or to deny things for which there is a great deal of it. Many people of faith expect such permission and Harris does
...more

Not even sure where to start with this one...
Let's see, the pros:
Harris does a wonderful job of highlighting real problems in religion in general and Christianity in particular, both present and historical. Christians in fact have been and can be violent, close-minded, oppressive, and morally reprehensible.
Harris is likewise eloquent and passionate, in an age when both are fairly uncommon. He also has a clear grasp on the important issues, and rarely gets lost in the non-essentials.
The cons:
Y ...more
Let's see, the pros:
Harris does a wonderful job of highlighting real problems in religion in general and Christianity in particular, both present and historical. Christians in fact have been and can be violent, close-minded, oppressive, and morally reprehensible.
Harris is likewise eloquent and passionate, in an age when both are fairly uncommon. He also has a clear grasp on the important issues, and rarely gets lost in the non-essentials.
The cons:
Y ...more

Letter to a Christian Nation falls short of the high
mark Harris set for himself in The End of Faith.
Here he makes the same case as in that book, specifically directed toward Christians in the US.
My main problem with Letter is that Harris continually refers to ridiculous statistics about the beliefs of Americans. Harris cites Gallup polls that "reveal that 53% of Americans are actually creationists". I suppose that one could interpret these statistics that way. But I think that the real truth is ...more
mark Harris set for himself in The End of Faith.
Here he makes the same case as in that book, specifically directed toward Christians in the US.
My main problem with Letter is that Harris continually refers to ridiculous statistics about the beliefs of Americans. Harris cites Gallup polls that "reveal that 53% of Americans are actually creationists". I suppose that one could interpret these statistics that way. But I think that the real truth is ...more

This book provides a great definition of Atheism:
"The entirety of atheism is contained in this response. Atheism is not a philosophy; it is not even a view of the world; it is simply an admission of the obvious. In fact, "atheism" is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a "non-astrologer" or a "non-alchemist". We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattl ...more
"The entirety of atheism is contained in this response. Atheism is not a philosophy; it is not even a view of the world; it is simply an admission of the obvious. In fact, "atheism" is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a "non-astrologer" or a "non-alchemist". We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattl ...more

Beautifully written, impeccably logical, calmly soft-spoken.
Almost an ode to Reason, not unlike Carl Sagan's The Demon Haunted World, but more concise and more specifically focused on religion. ...more
Almost an ode to Reason, not unlike Carl Sagan's The Demon Haunted World, but more concise and more specifically focused on religion. ...more



Mar 05, 2010
Angel Jenkins
marked it as to-read