From the Bookshelf of The Transition Movement

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

David Rubenstein
Oct 26, 2014 rated it really liked it
Not really a book, Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway have written a historical essay from the point of view of a future Chinese historian. The history recounts the scientific, political, and social events during the years 1988 to 2093. The essay shows how, even though scientists predicted the consequences of greenhouse gas emissions on the earth's climate, politicians and corporations weaseled out of the implications, rationalizing their actions (or inactions), and shrugged off responsibility for th ...more
Jonfaith
When scientists discovered the limits of planetary sinks, they also discovered market failure.

Potentially impactful for a naive reader. Couched in terms of 24C historical analysis, the documentary aspires for a neutral distance. I agree with other reviews about the detail afforded to the causes of the collapse, about the ideology which produced conspicuous consumption. We are generously treated to thumbnail portraits of Comte and Friedman. As eco-apocalypse goes, this is bloodless on the page.
...more
Antonomasia
A verbal docudrama; science fiction as polemic by scientists (or historians of science). This is the length you might expect for a Kindle Single or long short story; about 20% of it comprises footnotes. Its narrator is a Chinese historian of 400 years hence.

I found it most interesting of all on philosophy of science rather than on essentially familiar environmental material.

It’s weird that I have fewer than ten ‘environment’ books on GR: other major interests of mine as a kid & teenager have end
...more
Rob
Written from the standpoint of a Chinese historian a few hundred years in the future. There is also a Q. and A. at the end of the essay.

I like the subject matter, agree with most of the opinions and generally admire this author for other things she has written, but this is pretty bad. It is really just a longish essay, a polemic really, but it is badly written and the structure is messy.

These quick-fire essays/short books are one of Kindles strengths but this is a poor example.
Aloha
Jul 22, 2014 marked it as to-buy
rahul
Nov 20, 2014 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Khalil
Apr 09, 2015 rated it really liked it
Shelves: environment
Emilia von Turtle
Jul 23, 2015 marked it as to-read
Ted
Jan 07, 2016 marked it as maybe
Shelves: logged
Philip LaCombe
Oct 22, 2019 rated it liked it
Hend
Jul 26, 2022 marked it as to-read
Maia Ciobanu
Dec 03, 2024 marked it as to-read