91 books
—
19 voters
Computation Books
Showing 1-50 of 950

by (shelved 22 times as computation)
avg rating 4.24 — 2,095 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 10 times as computation)
avg rating 4.35 — 9,249 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 9 times as computation)
avg rating 4.47 — 4,831 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 8 times as computation)
avg rating 4.29 — 51,888 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 8 times as computation)
avg rating 4.25 — 474 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 7 times as computation)
avg rating 4.40 — 10,394 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 7 times as computation)
avg rating 4.10 — 3,008 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 7 times as computation)
avg rating 4.15 — 1,053 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 6 times as computation)
avg rating 4.38 — 1,884 ratings — published 1973

by (shelved 6 times as computation)
avg rating 4.43 — 522 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 6 times as computation)
avg rating 4.30 — 9,442 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 6 times as computation)
avg rating 4.20 — 11,857 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 6 times as computation)
avg rating 4.06 — 668 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 4.34 — 23,621 ratings — published 2023

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 4.13 — 34,330 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 4.59 — 110 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 4.33 — 135 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 4.36 — 23,092 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 4.34 — 2,671 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 4.33 — 23,640 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 3.85 — 20,555 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 4.44 — 11,200 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 5 times as computation)
avg rating 3.62 — 2,173 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 5.00 — 9 ratings — published

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 4.42 — 510 ratings — published 1973

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 4.34 — 1,857 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 4.15 — 212 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 4.15 — 5,755 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 4.27 — 580 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 3.59 — 496 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 4.24 — 282 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 4.30 — 481 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 4 times as computation)
avg rating 4.27 — 1,156 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.42 — 5,209 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 3.94 — 460 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.11 — 3,451 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 3.96 — 961 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.43 — 1,740 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.42 — 1,813 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.46 — 1,114 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.23 — 116,041 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.05 — 9,518 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.70 — 10,121 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.13 — 165 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 3.60 — 4,680 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.39 — 680 ratings — published 1949

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 3.83 — 4,278 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.30 — 28,629 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.12 — 3,866 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 3 times as computation)
avg rating 4.01 — 14,909 ratings — published 1975

“The reason [James Clerk] Maxwell's Demon cannot exist is that it does take resources to perform an act of discrimination. We imagine computation is free, but it never is. The very act of choosing which particle is cold or hot itself becomes an energy drain and a source of waste heat. The principle is also known as "no free lunch."
We do our best to implement Maxwell's Demon whenever we manipulate reality with our technologies, but we can never do so perfectly; we certainly can't get ahead of the game, which is known as entropy. All the air conditioners in a city emit heat that makes the city hotter overall. While you can implement what seems to be a Maxwell's Demon if you don't look too far or too closely, in the big picture you always lose more than you gain.
Every bit in a computer is a wannabe Maxwell's Demon, separating the state of "one" from the state of "zero" for a while, at a cost. A computer on a network can also act like a wannabe demon if it tries to sort data from networked people into one or the other side of some imaginary door, while pretending there is no cost or risk involved.”
― Who Owns the Future?
We do our best to implement Maxwell's Demon whenever we manipulate reality with our technologies, but we can never do so perfectly; we certainly can't get ahead of the game, which is known as entropy. All the air conditioners in a city emit heat that makes the city hotter overall. While you can implement what seems to be a Maxwell's Demon if you don't look too far or too closely, in the big picture you always lose more than you gain.
Every bit in a computer is a wannabe Maxwell's Demon, separating the state of "one" from the state of "zero" for a while, at a cost. A computer on a network can also act like a wannabe demon if it tries to sort data from networked people into one or the other side of some imaginary door, while pretending there is no cost or risk involved.”
― Who Owns the Future?

“We're presently in the midst of a third intellectual revolution. The first came with Newton: the planets obey physical laws. The second came with Darwin: biology obeys genetic laws. In today’s third revolution, were coming to realize that even minds and societies emerge from interacting laws that can be regarded as computations. Everything is a computation.”
―
―