163 books
—
68 voters
History Of Science Books
Showing 1-50 of 7,996

by (shelved 114 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.03 — 29,349 ratings — published 1962

by (shelved 111 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.99 — 75,441 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 87 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.22 — 415,207 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 75 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.97 — 9,856 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 65 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.32 — 28,837 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 65 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 791,758 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 60 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.92 — 55,334 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 54 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.95 — 5,948 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 51 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.09 — 727 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 47 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.89 — 55,471 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 43 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.40 — 24,033 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 43 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.75 — 30,179 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 41 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.99 — 523 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 40 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.88 — 894 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 39 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.17 — 198,890 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 38 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.11 — 1,230 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 37 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.84 — 19,831 ratings — published 1968

by (shelved 37 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.82 — 14,001 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 36 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 111,980 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 35 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.78 — 2,170 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 35 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 36,644 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 33 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.35 — 54,474 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 33 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.63 — 658 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 32 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 120,648 ratings — published 1859

by (shelved 31 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.66 — 2,117 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 29 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 16,916 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 29 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.31 — 56,334 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 29 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 860 ratings — published 1957

by (shelved 27 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 32,953 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 26 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.59 — 3,495 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 26 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.07 — 4,170 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 26 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 409 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 25 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.27 — 10,406 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 25 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.21 — 470,192 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 25 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.11 — 11,793 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 24 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.67 — 1,481 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 24 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.11 — 1,061 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 24 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.75 — 1,955 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 24 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.02 — 8,320 ratings — published 1839

by (shelved 24 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.78 — 323 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 24 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.88 — 623 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 22 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.95 — 1,488 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 22 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.27 — 214,556 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 22 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.25 — 1,204 ratings — published 1959

by (shelved 22 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 3.79 — 9,512 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 21 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 7,429 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 21 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.40 — 156,485 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 21 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 9,246 ratings — published 1982

by (shelved 21 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 28,630 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 20 times as history-of-science)
avg rating 4.31 — 21,840 ratings — published 2017

“Not enough books focus on how a culture responds to radically new ideas or discovery. Especially in the biography genre, they tend to focus on all the sordid details in the life of the person who made the discovery. I find this path to be voyeuristic but not enlightening. Instead, I ask, After evolution was discovered, how did religion and society respond? After cities were electrified, how did daily life change? After the airplane could fly from one country to another, how did commerce or warfare change? After we walked on the Moon, how differently did we view Earth? My larger understanding of people, places and things derives primarily from stories surrounding questions such as those.”
―
―

“Two writings of al-Hassār have survived. The first, entitled Kitāb al-bayān wa t-tadhkār [Book of proof and recall] is a handbook of calculation treating numeration, arithmetical operations on whole numbers and on fractions, extraction of the exact or approximate square root of a whole of fractionary number and summation of progressions of whole numbers (natural, even or odd), and of their squares and cubes. Despite its classical content in relation to the Arab mathematical tradition, this book occupies a certain important place in the history of mathematics in North Africa for three reasons: in the first place, and notwithstanding the development of research, this manual remains the most ancient work of calculation representing simultaneously the tradition of the Maghrib and that of Muslim Spain. In the second place, this book is the first wherein one has found a symbolic writing of fractions, which utilises the horizontal bar and the dust ciphers i.e. the ancestors of the digits that we use today (and which are, for certain among them, almost identical to ours) [Woepcke 1858-59: 264-75; Zoubeidi 1996]. It seems as a matter of fact that the utilisation of the fraction bar was very quickly generalised in the mathematical teaching in the Maghrib, which could explain that Fibonacci (d. after 1240) had used in his Liber Abbaci, without making any particular remark about it [Djebbar 1980 : 97-99; Vogel 1970-80]. Thirdly, this handbook is the only Maghribian work of calculation known to have circulated in the scientific foyers of south Europe, as Moses Ibn Tibbon realised, in 1271, a Hebrew translation.
[Mathematics in the Medieval Maghrib: General Survey on Mathematical Activities in North Africa]”
―
[Mathematics in the Medieval Maghrib: General Survey on Mathematical Activities in North Africa]”
―
The following shelves are listed as duplicates of this shelf:
historyofscience, science-history, and scientific-history