249 books
—
27 voters
Mathematical Books
Showing 1-50 of 985

by (shelved 21 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.10 — 101,390 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 13 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.81 — 76,180 ratings — published 1884

by (shelved 7 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.06 — 76,770 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 6 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.95 — 21,015 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 6 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.29 — 51,885 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 5 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.06 — 600,800 ratings — published 1871

by (shelved 5 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.95 — 24,177 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 4 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.31 — 787 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 4 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.20 — 21,501 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 4 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.30 — 964 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 4 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.15 — 3,739 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 4 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.44 — 218 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 4 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.09 — 41,127 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 4 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.06 — 6,791 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.29 — 7,127 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.10 — 21,399 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.15 — 5,452 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.59 — 2,308 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.76 — 4,642 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.06 — 8,635 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.41 — 1,657 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.87 — 29,502 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.39 — 8,605 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.41 — 651 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.89 — 6,385 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.34 — 1,857 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.03 — 2,183 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.30 — 28,629 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.05 — 20,438 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.08 — 166 ratings — published 1957

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.25 — 2,017 ratings — published 1941

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.82 — 11 ratings — published 1977

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.73 — 11 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.07 — 67 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.17 — 236 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.39 — 79 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.85 — 1,002 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.10 — 21,930 ratings — published 1921

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.87 — 1,709 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.30 — 32,954 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.31 — 3,182 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 3 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.73 — 1,731 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 2 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.27 — 11 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 2 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.74 — 2,051 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 2 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.78 — 5,289 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 2 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.04 — 16,783 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 2 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.91 — 2,156 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 2 times as mathematical)
avg rating 3.54 — 57 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.22 — 3,373 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as mathematical)
avg rating 4.21 — 1,891 ratings — published 2018

“Yes," I continued, "I discovered this model recently and her style never fails to be mathematically perfect. She seems to come by it naturally. As if she were born resonant. I notice Japanese models tend to do this. Like I said, they seem to have resonance somewhere deep in their culture. But Yuri Nakagawa, she's the best I've ever seen. The best model, with the most powerful resonance. I need her to probe deeper
into this profound mathematical instinct, which I call resonance.”
― Trueman Bradley: The Next Great Detective
into this profound mathematical instinct, which I call resonance.”
― Trueman Bradley: The Next Great Detective

“The elegance of a mathematical theorem is directly proportional to the number of independent ideas one can see in the theorem and inversely proportional to the effort it takes to see them.”
― Mathematical Discovery on Understanding, Learning, and Teaching Problem Solving, Volume I
― Mathematical Discovery on Understanding, Learning, and Teaching Problem Solving, Volume I