137 books
—
16 voters
Pop Science Books
Showing 1-50 of 4,899

by (shelved 108 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.21 — 470,239 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 98 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 1,217,512 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 90 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.22 — 415,253 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 84 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 189,984 ratings — published 1976

by (shelved 80 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 888,970 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 76 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 851,130 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 69 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 847,002 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 67 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 616,746 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 66 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.14 — 192,509 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 60 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.17 — 570,863 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 52 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.40 — 156,506 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 49 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 201,731 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 48 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.37 — 218,504 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 48 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 235,887 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 46 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.05 — 241,662 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 45 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 791,841 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 44 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 448,197 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 40 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 281,389 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 40 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.18 — 30,755 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 40 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.95 — 59,684 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 40 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.29 — 78,959 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 39 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 44,539 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.31 — 96,343 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.93 — 50,881 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 468,222 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.92 — 55,342 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.85 — 59,731 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 35 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 55,649 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 35 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.10 — 101,391 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 34 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.90 — 280,420 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 34 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 76,773 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 34 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.03 — 40,440 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 34 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.27 — 214,596 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 33 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.35 — 54,487 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 33 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 552,565 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 33 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.12 — 129,894 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 31 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.99 — 64,976 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 29 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.60 — 40,291 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 28 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.97 — 190,031 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 28 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.21 — 30,313 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 26 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 27,754 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 26 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.09 — 41,129 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.39 — 30,179 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 111,993 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 32,955 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 209,307 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 119,965 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 28,303 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 24 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.00 — 331,396 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 24 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 28,629 ratings — published 1999
“Des résultats qui apparaissent pour la première fois dans des rapports ou des livres, même à gros tirage, n'ont aucune fiabilité. Tout simplement parce que ces publications n'ont pas passé le filtre du contrôle par les pairs. Les éditeurs n'ont évidemment pas la capacité d'expertise du monde académique et leur premier souci est plus de s'assurer du potentiel de vente d'un livre que de la parfaite légitimité scientifique des arguments que l'on y trouve. Par ailleurs, un livre qui se glorifie de présenter des résultats s'opposant au consensus, ou à la pensée unique ou à l'idéologie dominante, a toutes les chances d'être une imposture scientifique.”
― Le Négationnisme économique. Et comment s'en débarrasser (ESSAIS)
― Le Négationnisme économique. Et comment s'en débarrasser (ESSAIS)

“This awesome world isn't just a spectator sport. It's symbiotic; it influences us, and we influence it." from A Walk Around the Block (Harper One)”
― A Walk Around the Block: Stoplight Secrets, Mischievous Squirrels, Manhole Mysteries & Other Stuff You See Every Day
― A Walk Around the Block: Stoplight Secrets, Mischievous Squirrels, Manhole Mysteries & Other Stuff You See Every Day