20 books
—
5 voters
Tudor History Books
Showing 1-50 of 834

by (shelved 49 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.12 — 72,382 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 42 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.98 — 14,251 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 31 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.20 — 10,583 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 31 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.01 — 15,399 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 26 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.09 — 510,062 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 25 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.10 — 14,461 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 25 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.91 — 94,624 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 24 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.93 — 166,350 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 23 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.03 — 32,710 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 22 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.77 — 10,464 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 21 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.74 — 56,993 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 21 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.11 — 19,060 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 20 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.01 — 15,720 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 19 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.86 — 3,046 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 19 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.13 — 10,119 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 19 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.99 — 28,451 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 19 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.98 — 34,786 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 18 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.91 — 229,159 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 18 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.96 — 181,243 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 18 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.89 — 100,116 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 17 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.15 — 2,277 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 17 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.70 — 49,194 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 16 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.11 — 17,410 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 15 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.82 — 77,237 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 14 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.26 — 28,742 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 13 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.30 — 103,261 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 13 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.02 — 9,105 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 13 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.72 — 4,247 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 12 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.13 — 4,402 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 11 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.14 — 12,277 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 11 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.83 — 4,179 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 11 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.94 — 48,261 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 11 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.99 — 17,370 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 11 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.90 — 5,769 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.40 — 45,541 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.16 — 1,006 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.06 — 31,850 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.82 — 5,085 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.09 — 644 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.00 — 1,947 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.91 — 1,328 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.12 — 3,440 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.04 — 3,419 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.97 — 3,289 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.07 — 12,173 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 10 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.84 — 7,660 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 9 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.18 — 9,826 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 9 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.01 — 1,525 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 9 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 3.96 — 32,502 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 9 times as tudor-history)
avg rating 4.00 — 49,723 ratings — published 2012
“Mary was certainly sympathetic to Jane's situation, and though she soon removed from the Tower to Richmond Palace without seeing her cousin, Jane was not forgotten. By 13 August it seems clear that Mary had received Jane's letter, and that she had accepted her version of events. During their audience with her that day, the Imperial ambassadors reported that thought the Queen made it clear that 'she had not pardoned anybody yet', and there were many who whispered in the Queen's ear that 'Jane of Suffolk deserved death according to English law', Mary, conscious of their familial bonds and Jane's tender age, could not bring herself to execute her cousin. It was evident that Mary believed in Jane's innocence, for in words that almost echoed those in Jane's letter, the ambassadors informed their master that Jane knew nothing of the plans in which she had become helplessly entangled, 'nor was she ever a party nor did she ever give her consent to the [Duke of Northumberland]'s intrigues and plots'. This seems to indicate that Mary had indeed received Jane's account, and she was firm in her decision to be merciful. The Queen's conscience, the ambassadors continued, 'would not permit her to have her put to death', despite the fact that she had been warned by the use of an example from Roman history that it would be better to put Jane to death, 'because of the scandal and danger that might have followed'. Jane's life, it seemed, was safe.”
― Crown of Blood: The Deadly Inheritance of Lady Jane Grey
― Crown of Blood: The Deadly Inheritance of Lady Jane Grey
“Though wildly different in both character and tastes, Jane and Mary shared a common bond aside from the royal blood which flowed in their veins: their religious devotion was unswerving, and the dominant factor in both of their lives. For Mary, the situation was heartbreaking. Jane's mother, Frances, had been a close childhood companion. Frances, like her husband and her daughter, was a Protestant, though perhaps not as fervent in her faith as her husband and eldest daughter. Despite the fact that she and Mary were on opposing sides of the religious fence, to all appearances their differing beliefs had never driven a wedge between the cousins. Frances was a seasoned courtier, and as such she was well skilled in the art of diplomacy. It seems likely, therefore, that when she was in the company of her childhood friend, the two women tactfully avoided conversing on the subject of religion. After all, there were many at court who managed to maintain friendships with people who held differing religious beliefs, and Mary had also been friendly with Jane's step-grandmother, Katherine Willoughby. But it was quite different with jane, for though Mary had tried her best with the teenager, and had done her utmost to be affectionate, the relationship was not a harmonious one. The age gap between them meant that to Jane, Mary was probably more like an aunt than a cousin. Mary may have been twenty years Jane's senior, but it was not age that lay at the heart of the matter; the reason for the distance between the two cousins was perfectly simple: religion.”
― Crown of Blood: The Deadly Inheritance of Lady Jane Grey
― Crown of Blood: The Deadly Inheritance of Lady Jane Grey