66 books
—
2 voters
Weird Fiction Books
Showing 1-50 of 11,945

by (shelved 313 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.79 — 287,059 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 240 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.98 — 74,442 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 175 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.90 — 76,905 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 173 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.54 — 27,171 ratings — published 1895

by (shelved 173 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.55 — 101,840 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 165 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.02 — 116,521 ratings — published 1928

by (shelved 159 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.66 — 77,427 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 150 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.93 — 40,430 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 134 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.62 — 28,435 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 130 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.86 — 40,968 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 122 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.19 — 34,318 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 119 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.09 — 193,627 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 111 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.79 — 61,908 ratings — published 1931

by (shelved 111 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.96 — 5,896 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 108 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.05 — 16,356 ratings — published 1907

by (shelved 101 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.58 — 10,426 ratings — published 1908

by (shelved 100 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.53 — 153 ratings — published

by (shelved 99 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.86 — 7,941 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 97 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.28 — 2,493 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 93 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.87 — 4,475 ratings — published 1904

by (shelved 88 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.90 — 34,136 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 87 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.10 — 5,724 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 83 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.73 — 16,645 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 81 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.84 — 33,029 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 76 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.10 — 982,261 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 75 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.14 — 1,665 ratings — published 1935

by (shelved 72 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.67 — 15,936 ratings — published 1890

by (shelved 70 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.00 — 4,745 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 67 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.82 — 43,238 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 67 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.07 — 74,254 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 67 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.06 — 3,763 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 65 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.22 — 423,005 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 65 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.72 — 6,153 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 64 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.89 — 2,253 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 64 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.01 — 48,133 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 64 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.09 — 2,306 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 63 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.54 — 7,516 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 62 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.90 — 1,360,846 ratings — published 1915

by (shelved 61 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.10 — 26,554 ratings — published 1936

by (shelved 60 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.34 — 36,516 ratings — published 1936

by (shelved 58 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.69 — 8,732 ratings — published 1970

by (shelved 58 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.07 — 3,978 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 58 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.96 — 3,451 ratings — published 1974

by (shelved 54 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.36 — 8,880 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 51 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.87 — 82,416 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 50 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.89 — 13,455 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 49 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 4.11 — 22,675 ratings — published 1941

by (shelved 48 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.47 — 296,759 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 47 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.65 — 4,482 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 46 times as weird-fiction)
avg rating 3.99 — 4,544 ratings — published 2013

“Sound waves, regardless of their frequency or intensity, can only be detected by the Mole Fly’s acute sense of smell—it is a little known fact that the Mole Fly’s auditory receptors do not, in fact, have a corresponding center in the brain designated for the purposes of processing sensory stimuli and so, these stimuli, instead of being siphoned out as noise, bypass the filters to be translated, oddly enough, by the part of the brain that processes smell. Consequently, the Mole Fly’s brain, in its inevitable confusion, understands sound as an aroma, rendering the boundary line between the auditory and olfactory sense indistinguishable.
Sounds, thus, come in a variety of scents with an intensity proportional to its frequency. Sounds of shorter wavelength, for example, are particularly pungent. What results is a species of creature that cannot conceptualize the possibility that sound and smell are separate entities, despite its ability to discriminate between the exactitudes of pitch, timbre, tone, scent, and flavor to an alarming degree of precision. Yet, despite this ability to hyper-analyze, they lack the cognitive skill to laterally link successions of either sound or smell into a meaningful context, resulting in the equivalent of a data overflow.
And this may be the most defining element of the Mole Fly’s behavior: a blatant disregard for the context of perception, in favor of analyzing those remote and diminutive properties that distinguish one element from another. While sensory continuity seems logical to their visual perception, as things are subject to change from moment-to-moment, such is not the case with their olfactory sense, as delays in sensing new smells are granted a degree of normality by the brain. Thus, the Mole Fly’s olfactory-auditory complex seems to be deprived of the sensory continuity otherwise afforded in the auditory senses of other species. And so, instead of sensing aromas and sounds continuously over a period of time—for example, instead of sensing them 24-30 times per second, as would be the case with their visual perception—they tend to process changes in sound and smell much more slowly, thereby preventing them from effectively plotting the variations thereof into an array or any kind of meaningful framework that would allow the information provided by their olfactory and auditory stimuli to be lasting in their usefulness.
The Mole flies, themselves, being the structurally-obsessed and compulsive creatures that they are, in all their habitual collecting, organizing, and re-organizing of found objects into mammoth installations of optimal functional value, are remarkably easy to control, especially as they are given to a rather false and arbitrary sense of hierarchy, ascribing positions—that are otherwise trivial, yet necessarily mundane if only to obscure their true purpose—with an unfathomable amount of honor, to the logical extreme that the few chosen to serve in their most esteemed ranks are imbued with a kind of obligatory arrogance that begins in the pupal stages and extends indefinitely, as they are further nurtured well into adulthood by a society that infuses its heroes of middle management with an immeasurable sense of importance—a kind of celebrity status recognized by the masses as a living embodiment of their ideals. And yet, despite this culture of celebrity worship and vicarious living, all whims and impulses fall subservient, dropping humbly to the knees—yes, Mole Flies do, in fact, have knees!—before the grace of the merciful Queen, who is, in actuality, just a puppet dictator installed by the Melic papacy, using an old recycled Damsel fly-fishing lure. The dummy is crude, but convincing, as the Mole flies treat it as they would their true-born queen.”
― Don't Forget to Breathe
Sounds, thus, come in a variety of scents with an intensity proportional to its frequency. Sounds of shorter wavelength, for example, are particularly pungent. What results is a species of creature that cannot conceptualize the possibility that sound and smell are separate entities, despite its ability to discriminate between the exactitudes of pitch, timbre, tone, scent, and flavor to an alarming degree of precision. Yet, despite this ability to hyper-analyze, they lack the cognitive skill to laterally link successions of either sound or smell into a meaningful context, resulting in the equivalent of a data overflow.
And this may be the most defining element of the Mole Fly’s behavior: a blatant disregard for the context of perception, in favor of analyzing those remote and diminutive properties that distinguish one element from another. While sensory continuity seems logical to their visual perception, as things are subject to change from moment-to-moment, such is not the case with their olfactory sense, as delays in sensing new smells are granted a degree of normality by the brain. Thus, the Mole Fly’s olfactory-auditory complex seems to be deprived of the sensory continuity otherwise afforded in the auditory senses of other species. And so, instead of sensing aromas and sounds continuously over a period of time—for example, instead of sensing them 24-30 times per second, as would be the case with their visual perception—they tend to process changes in sound and smell much more slowly, thereby preventing them from effectively plotting the variations thereof into an array or any kind of meaningful framework that would allow the information provided by their olfactory and auditory stimuli to be lasting in their usefulness.
The Mole flies, themselves, being the structurally-obsessed and compulsive creatures that they are, in all their habitual collecting, organizing, and re-organizing of found objects into mammoth installations of optimal functional value, are remarkably easy to control, especially as they are given to a rather false and arbitrary sense of hierarchy, ascribing positions—that are otherwise trivial, yet necessarily mundane if only to obscure their true purpose—with an unfathomable amount of honor, to the logical extreme that the few chosen to serve in their most esteemed ranks are imbued with a kind of obligatory arrogance that begins in the pupal stages and extends indefinitely, as they are further nurtured well into adulthood by a society that infuses its heroes of middle management with an immeasurable sense of importance—a kind of celebrity status recognized by the masses as a living embodiment of their ideals. And yet, despite this culture of celebrity worship and vicarious living, all whims and impulses fall subservient, dropping humbly to the knees—yes, Mole Flies do, in fact, have knees!—before the grace of the merciful Queen, who is, in actuality, just a puppet dictator installed by the Melic papacy, using an old recycled Damsel fly-fishing lure. The dummy is crude, but convincing, as the Mole flies treat it as they would their true-born queen.”
― Don't Forget to Breathe
“This place has a mind of its own. This place, this trap, this bedlam, this bardo state, this gnarled knot of nothing.”
― The Troika
― The Troika
The following shelves are listed as duplicates of this shelf:
weird-tales