Harry Potter discussion

Am I the only one who wonders what happened to obnoxious Umbridge ?
What do you think happened to her ? But I suppose the ministry could find her killed or alive

Didn't she get sent to Azkaban?

J.K. Rowling said she was arrested and sent to azkaban (which no longer has dementors) for crimes against muggle borns.

I've wondered that from the start.

And Moody Eye knows what boggarts look like... I think Lupin once said that no one did.

Bitch deserves it

Also grawp , wonder where he wandered off to

Exactly lol

And I always wondered why they didn't just use guns along with their wands , god knows it's easier than uttering a string of spells and wand movements LOOL

Except all the enemy would have to do is put up a Shield Charm and voila.

Yea but I bet Voldemort wished he used a gun to try to kill harry instead of the killing curse after that back lash lol

@Vrsh, they decided this as they believed the Weasley's were trapped at the other side of the barrier and couldn't get back, so they would have to go themselves. Ron says it at the Platform.

But Hedwig wld take time to reach Hogwarts. And reaching Hogwarts was a priority at that time. They'd have to wait for Hedwig's reply and the term would already hav begun. There's no way they could hav waited that long since Harry couldn't go back to the Dursleys' given his rude departure.

He wouldn't have had to go back to the Dursleys, though. He and Ron just had to wait for the Weasleys to come back. And sure, that could have taken some time (no more than a couple of hours from their point of view, surely), but it definitely would have been the smarter thing to do, since missing the first day of term is preferable to being in trouble with the law (or dead).

Am I the only one who wonders what was written in the letter to Petunia Dursley?

Pandy wrote: "He wouldn't have had to go back to the Dursleys, though. He and Ron just had to wait for the Weasleys to come back. And sure, that could have taken some time (no more than a couple of hours from th..."

yeah, but the whole point was that they were these 12 year old boys who didn't think and acted all irresponsibly. they wouldn't have done it in the later books.

Katherine wrote: "Pandy wrote: "He wouldn't have had to go back to the Dursleys, though. He and Ron just had to wait for the Weasleys to come back. And sure, that could have taken some time (no more than a couple of..."

I think that is exactly the crux of the argument. They were just two silly young boys. Like Harry says in the book: "We didn't think..." to which McGonagall replies "That is obvious." Or something like that.

Ishani wrote: "Am I the only one who wonders what was written in the letter to Petunia Dursley?"

Yes, I've wondered that too.

Becca wrote: "Ishani wrote: "Am I the only one who wonders what was written in the letter to Petunia Dursley?"

Yes, I've wondered that too."

I wish Jo had shared that on Pottermore.

Meh, she still might - she's still got a lot of time to do it!

My guess is that if she ever released that information it would be when the fifth book was available.

Katherine wrote: "Pandy wrote: "He wouldn't have had to go back to the Dursleys, though. He and Ron just had to wait for the Weasleys to come back. And sure, that could have taken some time (no more than a couple of..."

Oh, I agree. I don't think their actions are unrealistic. I was just responding to the comment about Harry having to go back to the Durselys.

Libby wrote: "My guess is that if she ever released that information it would be when the fifth book was available."

:) We'll see.