ROBUST discussion
Author to Author
>
Commissioned to write two more articles...one due in a week. Eeek!
Five programmes are already a lot to review in one piece, Katie. I would suggest you review the Big Three, Word, Pages and Scrivener, and just note the other two by exception. In the time available, you'd be smart to stick to what you already know, rather than scramble madly through applications that are new to you.


http://www.libreoffice.org/
What I like is in the options, I can select to save it in just about every cool format out there, and export directly into a PDF. I use this program to make my paperback interior PDF files, and they come out splendid with no tweaking necessary.

Go for it Katie!
(Though weren't you supposed to be on holiday this week?)

Go for it Katie!
(Though weren't you supposed to be on holiday this week?)"
Holiday? Oh, yes, I was, wasn't I? Oops.


If you install them both, you can't tell them apart side by side when they're running. Kinda funny that way,


The report on my MRI: "An unremarkable brain."
Man, that deflated my ego.

We ROBUSTERS have irrefutable proof you do not have an unremarkable brain, Patricia.
Amos, my thoughts are with you. Hope you are feeling better soon!
Katie wrote: "One has gone and been accepted, the other is still in my head! :)"
When you send your head to the magazine, be sure to pack it in plenty of dry ice...
When you send your head to the magazine, be sure to pack it in plenty of dry ice...

When you send your head to the magazine, be sure to pack it in plenty of dry ice..."
Dry ice isn't that great. It doesn't penetrate very deep into layered tissue. Liquid Nitrogen, on the other hand, is the best in the Universe for that stuff.
I once tried to invent a way of copying the electron patterns inside the human brain into an ingram-memory based system. Using something akin to MRI, but instead of magnetism, the medium was positive ions suspended in an Argon gas canister that would hold the matrix, making a deeper 3D image of the memory patterns and not the organic tissue. Sorta like making a xerox of a person's education and skill set.
I'm not sure where things went wrong. My niece made a great test subject. I actually got a viable pattern. But I had to toss out the idea because balloons filled with Helium tends to gravitate towards her head, ruining birthday parties for years and years. When it happens, her expression is weird too, but I digress, apologies...
I guess I'm trying to say that I wish it worked out. Katie could have xeroxed her mental ingrams and sent that instead. No ice or cold storage of any type needed. ^_^
Nah, it's the air. I know, because on my native planet we breathe helium and wouldn't dream of mixing it with as much unstable, flammible, corrosive oxygen as you earthling breathe without even thinking how it clogs your arteries and oxidizes your lungs, a process akin to rusting of metal. Ugh.

So THAT'S why everything you say is so high pitched. I shoulda figured it out sooner. ^_^
I used to be a Helium junkie at parties, made everyone laugh. Just... whatever you do... never try blowing out the candles with a lungful of helium. While it didn't actually hurt me (I kept most of my hair), the cake was a freaky mess. It ended up with some priest yelling verses at me while pointing his finger a few days later, trying to exorcise me.
Very embarrasing.
(I am -not- going back to hell, either! I hate that place!)

Katie wrote: "This place is weird!
;)"
No doubt about that!




(Ahem, Dakota, hand it over. Don't pout, I'm sure you'll get it back before long.)



Katie, yesterday Amazon.uk sent me an email with recommendations for books I might like. Andre's Iditarod was listed first.
Today, Amazon.com sent me one with Treespeaker at the top, and your other two next! PM me with your email addy and I will forward. (Not techy enough to post a snapshot on here).
Not only that, but the subject line for Andre's was IDITAROD... in all caps.
Today it was Treespeaker, in lower case.


Good luck with your NaNoWriMo. Always thought it might be a good excercise in writing.

I'd been writing on and off for years. I took a few creative writing courses back in HS and in college.
I never could do much, though because I was convinced you had to sit there and carefully craft everything right then and there. The net result was that I was generally paralyzed and didn't write much of anything.
I did NaNoWriMo years back and it finally freed me. I internalized the idea of just writing and not getting so hung up that I wasn't penning gold on the first pass. It also taught me I could produce a full-length work with a coherent plot.
Before NaNo, the only thing I managed to get out were pretty small short stories.
Now, I never did anyhting with those NaNoWriMo novels, but they were great practice.
It is possible to write and polish x number of words a day as a finished product and eventually produce a novel. Journalists have much practice at this method. But the complete novel always, to my mind at least, reads jerkily, like a compilation of daily pieces written by a novelist. Arthur Haley, a bestseller a few decades ago, used this method to create fat thrillers.
But basically there are only two methods of writing a novel, John Braine's and mine. It just appears that in WRITING A THRILLER I give you lots of choices. But it's the small techniques (yeah, I know, until you internalize them, they can loom like large obstacles( in which I offer a choice. In the end my method and John Braine's is the same, to get the novel down whole and as fast as you can, and then to work it over obsessively.
Such a large proportion of what is published in indieville is crap because people who want to call themselves "authors" publish first drafts without the diligence of the second stage, which takes much more time and effort and skill. Old fashioned publishers and editors had barriers precisely for pretenders to fall at when they didn't grasp this necessity.
Any moron can write a first draft of some me-too story. Writing an original novel takes imagination for the first draft, and craft, skill, talent (usually expressed as discrimination and sensitivity) and perseverance to turn that first draft into a novel.
But basically there are only two methods of writing a novel, John Braine's and mine. It just appears that in WRITING A THRILLER I give you lots of choices. But it's the small techniques (yeah, I know, until you internalize them, they can loom like large obstacles( in which I offer a choice. In the end my method and John Braine's is the same, to get the novel down whole and as fast as you can, and then to work it over obsessively.
Such a large proportion of what is published in indieville is crap because people who want to call themselves "authors" publish first drafts without the diligence of the second stage, which takes much more time and effort and skill. Old fashioned publishers and editors had barriers precisely for pretenders to fall at when they didn't grasp this necessity.
Any moron can write a first draft of some me-too story. Writing an original novel takes imagination for the first draft, and craft, skill, talent (usually expressed as discrimination and sensitivity) and perseverance to turn that first draft into a novel.

But if NaNo will get rump to chair and fingers to keyboard - it's a good thing.
Swallow the Moon is a NaNo book. It took me a month to write it and a year to polish it.
BTW, what does NaNoWriMo stand for? It sounds like it should produce inordinate amounts of doggerel...

I definitely won't be publishing the bilge I'm producing for this, but it will give me something to work with; in contrast to the one I've just finished which I've prodded at for years. It has been a really hard book to finish and I still need to rewrite vast chunks of it.
Mark of the Dragon Queen only took me three months to write and maybe six months to rewrite, but it has been my best seller.
Thanks!