Percy Jackson is Awesome!!! discussion
Discussions
>
How will Nico react to being the leader of all those demigods?
date
newest »


Like Nico will lead them to the doors of death, sure. Cause no one else (except maybe Hazel) knows where it is.
But he isn't gonna give orders like Scrub the deck! or Man the lifeboats!, you know what I'm saying!
He just isn't going to be able to boss Jason around.

P.s. If like Nico please join this group!
http://www.goodreads.com/group/show/8...


They've all seen deaths as well, and if anything that makes Nico stronger because he's overcome his troubles.
As for being hungry and beaten down, that's also no different to any other of the heroes. Look at Percy when he washed up on Calypso's island - he was beaten down and nearly dead, did that make him less of a good leader?



Yea I agree with everything u just said.

Hazel has more confidence for things she cares about. I know she would be just great a leader, better than Nico because aka son and Leo don't trust him even though they can't help it.

The only reason I think Jason makes a better leader is because of the way he has been raised. No matter how good Percy is, he acts before assessing the situation, it's in his instincts to do all he can to protect the people he loves automatically. Case in point - Annabeth. He went with her into Tartarus, even knowing how important he was in the prophecy, because his feelings control him. Jason is more capable of keeping himself calm under pressure like that, he's used to thinking like a Roman, strategical. That doesn't make a better hero, but it does make a better leader.

< my opinion
> your opinion
I have a dream, that one day I can speak that I think without getting criticised.
Percy is always right though, he's made it this far into the series so he is good for something.
Your wrong about Hazel and even if your arent I doubt it.
So you like the romans better than the Greeks?
So Percy's out of one book for protecting his girlfriend!!! Isnt thatthe point of a relationship? You need to care for the person you love.
Whoa, she didn't criticize you, she just stated her opinion :)
I can see where you both are coming from. I think they are both really good leaders.
Percy is a good leader because he cares. He cares about everyone in the quest and will save them. Also, he just naturally knows what to do and is a good fighter. He's just good at leading.
Jason is a good leader because he can keep a straight head, and he knows exactly what to do in certain situations. He cares about the people in the quest and just was... raised as a leader.
Hazel can definitely be a leader, and be the optimistic one and the one that lifts everyone up and comes up with ideas. There are some points, however, where she lets other people take charge.
I can see where you both are coming from. I think they are both really good leaders.
Percy is a good leader because he cares. He cares about everyone in the quest and will save them. Also, he just naturally knows what to do and is a good fighter. He's just good at leading.
Jason is a good leader because he can keep a straight head, and he knows exactly what to do in certain situations. He cares about the people in the quest and just was... raised as a leader.
Hazel can definitely be a leader, and be the optimistic one and the one that lifts everyone up and comes up with ideas. There are some points, however, where she lets other people take charge.

I was only disagreeing with you. That's kind of what sites like this are for - sharing different opinions and debating. If you'd like to debate with me why not give me an example of when Hazel has shown she could be a leader?
I never said I like the Romans better than the Greeks? I never said there was anything wrong whatsoever with the way Percy deals with things, I only said it isn't a good quality for a leader, being a better leader means working well under pressure, making decisions that benefit the goal, keeping a level head. My preferences as far as characters go doesn't make one or the other a better leader though. We're talking leader traits, not who's a better character...

I didn't say you criticised me.
Do you see your name there?? Its just a Martin Luther King reference.
Yay. For. Opinions.
Debate with you about what? Lightbulbs?.
I'll give you an example when it isn't past twelve at night.
Also, I never wrote you 'prefer' Romans better than Greeks. I askes you if you did. So do you?

Also I didnt write that Hazel is the best leader or an amazing leader, Im saying she can be one if she needs to be.
Yeah I agree with that. Hazel can definitely be an amazing, inspiring leader- but not all the the time.

(i first wrote Leo -_-)

I can see where you both are coming from. I think they are both really good leaders.
Percy is a good leader because he cares. He car..."
I think there's a very important reason why Hera used Jason and Percy as the swapping delegates, and not just because they were the leaders at both camps. This plays into what was already said, but the fact is they balance each other. Jason might spend too long trying to think about how to attack a situation with a group of people while Percy just blunders ahead. Having them check one another is the most efficient way. And Hazel simply isn't a leadership candidate because she has no drive whatsoever to lead. She prefers to suggest what she has to say and do what the group decides. She's spirited, but in a managed way.

Nice of your opinion, but I think she has some potential in her, every has a time to shine.
It just that if Nico is leader, he doesn't seem like the type of kid to me, so Hazel is going to help him.



How do you know? Nico has lead himself this whole time, that's a better start than most of the characters (who wouldn't make it very far on their own).


Also Hazel has taken charge before.
In the Son of Neptune with the Amazons. She set them free, gaining Arion. The horse, (I think I spelt his name wrong)
She took charge then.



I wouldn't bet $500 against Hazel not leading part of the quest. And to be a leader, you need to take ideas, something we have already read that Hazel has done.


A leader is defined as a person followed by others. In this case, I believe all of them have had a point where they are placed in a leadership position whether they like it or not.
There is a REASON why there are so many demigods to this prophecy. They all play a crucial part, and every single one of them has. They will support each other, even without trust issues, because that's the only thing they can do. If they don't, which is certainly possible, that will become a major conflict, and something I expect will occur.
Whether Nico likes it or not, he will be the leader. Maybe not the leader of EVERYTHING. He can't charmspeak or light things on fire, but if Percy wanted him to be leader, he will try. Now, it's a different thing if he's followed. Perhaps he won't get the chance. Maybe he tries and Jason develops a superiority complex and boots him off the boat. Hopefully not.
But I do think Alice made a interesting point of how Percy and Jason balanced each other out.
Maybe Percy meant, 'he will lead you to where you need to go' – in which case, this conversation is inessential.
As for Melody's point, this discussion posed two clashing ideas– that of that Nico is/is not a better leader than Hazel, or Percy is/is not a better leader than Jason and that everyone can lead.
Perhaps they are ALL leaders. They lead different things. Savannah supported that. Hazel has good ideas, Jason can keep his head, Percy knows when to act, Leo can perform well in a tight spot, Piper has power in her words, Frank is an essential fighting force, Annabeth can solve problems quickly, Nico knows where to go and what to do (and I'm sure we'll discover what else he's good for eventually)
DEMIGODS ARE LEADERS. It's part of their blood, especially these demigods.
Not one is better than another. They are different types of leaders capable of different things. Give them a break. When their time comes, they will lead.
There is a REASON why there are so many demigods to this prophecy. They all play a crucial part, and every single one of them has. They will support each other, even without trust issues, because that's the only thing they can do. If they don't, which is certainly possible, that will become a major conflict, and something I expect will occur.
Whether Nico likes it or not, he will be the leader. Maybe not the leader of EVERYTHING. He can't charmspeak or light things on fire, but if Percy wanted him to be leader, he will try. Now, it's a different thing if he's followed. Perhaps he won't get the chance. Maybe he tries and Jason develops a superiority complex and boots him off the boat. Hopefully not.
But I do think Alice made a interesting point of how Percy and Jason balanced each other out.
Maybe Percy meant, 'he will lead you to where you need to go' – in which case, this conversation is inessential.
As for Melody's point, this discussion posed two clashing ideas– that of that Nico is/is not a better leader than Hazel, or Percy is/is not a better leader than Jason and that everyone can lead.
Perhaps they are ALL leaders. They lead different things. Savannah supported that. Hazel has good ideas, Jason can keep his head, Percy knows when to act, Leo can perform well in a tight spot, Piper has power in her words, Frank is an essential fighting force, Annabeth can solve problems quickly, Nico knows where to go and what to do (and I'm sure we'll discover what else he's good for eventually)
DEMIGODS ARE LEADERS. It's part of their blood, especially these demigods.
Not one is better than another. They are different types of leaders capable of different things. Give them a break. When their time comes, they will lead.
(_ _) O.O >:(
Percy told Nico to lead all the demigods to the Doors of Death. How will Nico react to that? How will the rest of the demigods react to that?