fiction files redux discussion

214 views
Group Reads > Suggestions for group reads

Comments Showing 151-168 of 168 (168 new)    post a comment »
1 2 4 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 151: by Dan, deadpan man (new)

Dan | 641 comments Mod
Hey Big Sleepers, you guys ready to get the party started on monday?


message 152: by Robert (new)

Robert Corbett (robcrowe00) Thanks for the reminder, Dan, to stay awake for the Big Sleep. Have never read noir from its original heyday.


message 153: by Elizabeth, bubbles (new)

Elizabeth (RedBrick) | 221 comments Mod
Who is the moderator? --- NOT IT!


message 154: by Leslie (new)

Leslie (homelore) | 42 comments Did anyone start reading the Big Sleep? Should I try to hunt down a copy?


message 155: by Hugh, aka Hugh the Moderator (new)

Hugh | 271 comments Mod
I have a copy and am ready if other folks are in.


message 156: by Elizabeth, bubbles (last edited Oct 12, 2012 10:51AM) (new)

Elizabeth (RedBrick) | 221 comments Mod
Hugh! :D Did anyone ever mention that you post like a moderator?

I'll follow you over to a new thread.

&
Hello, Leslie. Please do get the book, and join us!


message 157: by Dan, deadpan man (new)

Dan | 641 comments Mod
I'd be glad to send a group message about starting the group read whenever you guys want. Maybe we could also make sure we message those who expressed interest.


message 158: by Hugh, aka Hugh the Moderator (new)

Hugh | 271 comments Mod
Hmmm.... "Post like a moderator"... I'm not sure that's a good thing. But since I dress like a moderator and parallel park like a moderator, I won't argue.

Dan, if you could start a thread for Big Sleep, I'll open the proceedings and pray we don't end up with a big sleeper of a discussion. wha ha ha! See? I crack jokes like a moderator too. thanks.


message 159: by Maureen, mo-nemclature (last edited Oct 12, 2012 03:21PM) (new)

Maureen (modusa) | 683 comments Mod
hey hugh: there's already a big sleep thread from the previous group read... did you want a new one, or maybe we could just change the title of the thread to indicate it's all encompassing?

http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1...

also, i am still very keen on reading the long goodbye as a group read so if you guys get done with the big sleep and feel like doing some comparative chandler, let me know, okay?


message 160: by Hugh, aka Hugh the Moderator (new)

Hugh | 271 comments Mod
Maureen wrote: "hey hugh: there's already a big sleep thread from the previous group read... did you want a new one, or maybe we could just change the title of the thread to indicate it's all encompassing?

http:..."


Well, hell... Moderated by Chris, with color commentary from you and Patty? That's gold, baby! What would folks like to do -- add to it? Start a new one? Move on to something else like The Long Goodbye (talk about a different kind of link to the "movie version"!)


message 161: by Dan, deadpan man (new)

Dan | 641 comments Mod
May I suggest that in order to avoid spoilers and whatnot that we start a new thread and link to the old thread in the very first post?

I think that could help get things going. Whadda ya say Hugh, et al.?


message 162: by Hugh, aka Hugh the Moderator (new)

Hugh | 271 comments Mod
I'm fine with that... but want to be sure we've got a quorom here. At the risk of making this even MORE complicated though... I just finished the biography of David Foster Wallace and would be open to moderating a read of Infinite Jest, if there are enough folks to tackle that monster. Decisions, decisions


message 163: by Dan, deadpan man (new)

Dan | 641 comments Mod
Well there was a number of interested readers for Chandler a few weeks ago. Dunno what happened to them.

I wouldn't be ready to reread Infinite Jest in full since I just finished it a month ago. I would however reread sections and contribute to the conversation. I would also start reading Elegant Complexity and reread Burns' book on IJ during the group read. You would also be an excellent leader for IJ, Hugh.


message 164: by Leslie (new)

Leslie (homelore) | 42 comments I just looked The Big Sleep up at my library and it looks like they have a copy. I'll try to get over there to pick it up today and follow along with everyone. I'm still in if we have enough interested.


message 165: by Maureen, mo-nemclature (new)

Maureen (modusa) | 683 comments Mod
i worry about how sporadic notifications in goodreads can be -- if you haven't set it to give you email notifications it's even more spotty. i'd recommend that hugh or dan send a message via goodreads to the people who said they wanted to read big sleep to firm things up (or not)...

just my 4 cents. :)


message 166: by Leslie (new)

Leslie (homelore) | 42 comments You're so generous, Maureen. Usually I only give two cents.


message 167: by Patty, free birdeaucrat (new)

Patty | 896 comments Mod
Dan wrote: "OK! So I just closed the poll. Here are the top 5 (but really 11):


16 votes: 100 Years of Solitude

14 votes: The Big Sleep

12 votes: The Code of the Woosters; Erasure, Vile Bodies

10 votes: Se..."


Would it help to remind people about the group reads if we added all these to the group bookshelf, in the currently reading and to-read sections? When the group is currently reading, the book shows up at the top of the group page, and alerts everyone that the discussion is going on. Just a thought!


message 168: by Patty, free birdeaucrat (new)

Patty | 896 comments Mod
I'm wondering what's happening with our non-IJ group reads? Are they on hold? I hope people haven't given up because there was a non-starter?

Also, what do you guys think about my suggestion of adding these books to the group bookshelf to-read section?


1 2 4 next »
back to top