SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion
Members' Chat
>
Dresden Files - Does it get better?
date
newest »

I thought the first three or four were good but they rapidly get better from there. I would not skip any to be honest
Read wiki summaries of the first four or so. Then read book five.


I, too, failed to make it through the second book of the Dresden Files. The dialogue was just lame, and no characters seemed believable.
You might try picking up Butcher's "Codex Alera" series. The first one is "Furies of Calderon." I enjoyed all the books in that series.



They are narrated really well (by James Marsters) and he really brings the characters to life.
Dresdens humor also get through a lot better, than on paper.
The second and the first books are the two weakest of the series, but some of the characters that gets introduced here, you will want to know the back-story of if you get hooked later.

I totally agree with this. I loved the series even with some things I felt were flaws. Butcher is pretty consistent. His writing skills improve with time, though I never felt he was bad, but he's still got the same style and if you don't like his stuff in the first one, my guess is you won't like it later.



That is how I felt about his Codex Alera series, really weak, even though I know many who love it.

Exactly. I totally agree.


The Iron Druid avoids that issue by having the main character an Iron Age-era druid who owns a New Age bookshop and tea room, whose customers include witches, both wannabes and real. His lawyers are comprised of werewolves (for the day) and vampires (for night). There's no real-world stuff to trip him up.
I'm halfway through the second book and so far in the first two entries we've met various Celtic deities (the Morrigan, Brighid, Bres, the god of love), Coyote, demons, fallen angels, Bacchants and the Virgin Mary. He seems set on a course that brings him into eventual conflict with Thor, who is apparently one of the biggest dicks in the many pantheons.
Much more fun so far.
An example:
“Oberon’s been kidnapped along with one of the werewolves, and that’s why we’re all so upset. We’ll talk more tomorrow, and I promise to answer all your questions if I survive the night,” I said.
The widow’s eyebrows raised. “Ye’ve got all these nasty pooches to run around with and ye still might die?”
“I’m going to go fight with a god, some demons, and a coven of witches who all want to kill me,” I said, “so it’s a distinct possibility.”
“Are y’goin’ t’kill ’em back?”
“I’d certainly like to.”
“Attaboy,” the widow chuckled. “Off y’go, then. Kill every last one o’ the bastards and call me in the mornin’.”

I'm the same, tend to pick them up and read one when I can't get what I want from the library, waiting on something to be ordered/waiting on something in the mail.
I've actually stopped reading the third book about halfway through and returned it, because the book I wanted came in. And I'll pick it up again and go where I left off last time.
So I guess I do enjoy them, too a point. I find them entertaining, light, even if a few things may bother me about the writing/characters. I would never consider reading them one after the other though.

Just goes to show you how different people are...
I really didn't care for this series. I found the druid in Iron Druid to be unbelievable. He's a 2,000 year old guy acting like a 20 something. I just found the whole premise to be too wild for me. Harry on the other hand I found much more believable. The first few Dresden books were written ages ago and you can tell that they are first books, but Butcher's writing improves as he puts out more work.

I've enjoyed the Iron Druid series too, but I got halfway through the 4th book and became bored..... I think it's a situation for most series - that one reaches a saturation point and either give up, or plod on.
I'm a plodder-on with the Dresden series: yes there are some which are better than others, but that is typical. I'm at the point where Changes and Ghost Story are making me second-guess whether or not to continue.
In answer to the original post, yes, they do get better, but it's also hit-and-miss as to whether you'll be bothered or not.



Agreed.. Butcher opens up his universe slowly, introducing one "faction" or concept at a time, with Hearne it feels like he is sitting with a Mythology for Dummies namedropping like a madman..
I think Dresden Files(DF) is superior to Iron Druid(ID) in almost every way, except perhaps for the fact that ID starts strong then deteriorates and DF starts weak but improves..
Both series have a comical element to them, in DF its mainly Harry's tone that provides it(and to some extent "bob"), in ID it's the cartoonish talking dog, doing poodle and sausage one-liners.. I think the latter got old fairly quickly..
All the underlying plot-lines in the Dresden files that slowly gets expanded upon, the characters we end up having known for years of their lives and have seen how they have changed by their challenges, is what really appeals to me in DF.
Hearne´s plot-lines have already started getting repetitive, and he don't get enough done in regard to expanding upon his characters and his universe in each novel.. The characters act irrationally, and their actions and personalities seems to be contradict their back-stories.. Atticus himself is the best example of that.. All the gods are depicted as petty and unintelligent, and none of them is nearly as powerful as Atticus (sigh)..
Atticus.. the 2000 year old super-intelligent super-beautiful super-powerful druid, who acts as a stupid teenage boy..
.. But to each his own ;)


A lot of new authors would really do themselves a favor by caring more of getting read and known, than getting paid..
But thx for the recommendation, the premise does sound good..
Ben Aaronovitch Rivers of London, Mike Shevdon Sixty-one Nails, Sergei Lukyanenko Night Watch, Justin Gustainis Hard Spell, Glen Cook Sweet silver blues, John G. Hartness Hard Day's Knight, Harry Connolly Child of Fire, are some UF series ive enjoyed.. But not as much as the Dresden files :)


Finally I've found someone that's read them! I can't understand why more people haven't.
Never heard of 'em until now. Will give 'em a go soon.

Liked that too :)
Don't think it was similar to Dresden files though..

I couldn't help but compare Peter Grant to Harry Dresden when I read Midnight Riot and I have to say I much prefer Peter! They're both urban fantasy magic detective mystery vibe stories and the Peter Grant series wins out due to my personal preference for British humour and science as a means of understanding things. I also enjoyed the history of London (particularly the architecture) and the fact that our hero doesn't stay up for 4 days without sleep and multiple injuries but actually acts like a real person who eats and sleeps and get hurt.
I can't imagine I'll go back to Harry now that I've found Peter.
Also love PC Grant. Awaiting the next book with baited breath

Me too!! I thought Whispers Under Ground was the best so far and can't wait to see what he comes up with next :)



I have. I liked the first couple okay, then it gets rather weird and dark. I read them before GR, so I don't have a review up for any of them. He's a magic-user that has a mysterious magic block, so he has to resort to normal detective skills.

And that's not just true for readers. Some authors (most?) go through the same process. The better ones recognise it and realise that if they are becoming bored their readers will as well - then they go write a different series, in a different universe. Less skilled authors complain about writer's block and/or just carry on writing anyway . . .
I guess I had better not name any examples! But in my opinion it affects even the great writers from time to time.
Books mentioned in this topic
Unshapely Things (other topics)Whispers Under Ground (other topics)
Midnight Riot (other topics)
Monster Hunter International (other topics)
The Markhat Files (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Mark Del Franco (other topics)Glen Cook (other topics)
Kevin Hearne (other topics)
Which is strange, because every time I've seen Butcher give a talk or an interview, I have found his ideas and his way of thinking about Fantasy to be fascinating. He has some really great ideas. But his way of expressing them is leaving me cold.
I want to read that one about the T. Rex, but not if it's like this. My friend tells me I need to read all the books in order to understand what's going on, but I just can't. Not if they continue like this.
Do they get better? Which ones can I skip?