The Book Vipers discussion

This topic is about
Les Misérables
Group Read Archive
>
Les Miserables
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Elizabeth
(new)
Mar 11, 2013 12:59AM

reply
|
flag




Started this morning. Reading the Norman Denny translation. Also bought the same version for the kindle as the Penguin hardback would probably cause an injury if I fell asleep under it (!)
Just a spoiler-free update: exactly halfway through now and have to admit I wasn't sure it would be my sort of book -not sure why- but I truly think it's brilliant.
I hadn't seen the musical or film either so no expectations.
Like Dickens he can be a little overly sentimental and religious at times, he also has that whole madonna/whore approach to women that Dickens has but all that's typical of male 19th century authors imo and doesn't dim his genius.
I love the absolute attention to detail he puts into everything ;reading about Waterloo from the French perspective was fascinating (he was definitely a fan of Napoleon).
Deliberately not rushing through it, not that you can very easily with a tome like this. Considering it took M. Hugo 20 years to complete, it seems almost rude not to savour it :)
I hadn't seen the musical or film either so no expectations.
Like Dickens he can be a little overly sentimental and religious at times, he also has that whole madonna/whore approach to women that Dickens has but all that's typical of male 19th century authors imo and doesn't dim his genius.
I love the absolute attention to detail he puts into everything ;reading about Waterloo from the French perspective was fascinating (he was definitely a fan of Napoleon).
Deliberately not rushing through it, not that you can very easily with a tome like this. Considering it took M. Hugo 20 years to complete, it seems almost rude not to savour it :)

The musical and the film are great. The musical is utterly superb. I must have seen it over a dozen times and I still cry.
That's true Alexandra. I finished it last week and found the further on I got the less patience I had with the meanderings. I was very eager to know the outcome towards the end and not so bothered about pages and pages of detail to do with the Paris sewer system for example.
Overall though, I can see why it's an established classic: in lots of ways it's a book very much of its time yet as Emma mentioned still full of timeless insight and observation.
A great read, but wouldn't recommend to anyone in a hurry or who wants to zoom through their reading challenge :)
Overall though, I can see why it's an established classic: in lots of ways it's a book very much of its time yet as Emma mentioned still full of timeless insight and observation.
A great read, but wouldn't recommend to anyone in a hurry or who wants to zoom through their reading challenge :)



I understand why the movie is different than the book since I am adapting a 205 page book into a movie script and I must make major changes in order to make the script only 120 pages long.

So, I guess I don't really agree with the need to savour a book that took 20 years to write. He wrote it in such a different time in history, a time when people didn't have the instant access to information that we do. Didn't have the visual aids to help us imagine another time and place, so everything.....and i mean EVERYTHING(!)....needs describing. I am a big fan of classic works, but Tolstoy, Pasternak and now Hugo all detail it beyond my attention span!!!!
The movie was wonderful, so probably one of the few examples i have found were the movie outweighed the book. The songs are beautiful and have a strong meaning with me, connecting me to my school years. Glad to have read it but never again!!