Shadows of Self
discussion
Should this book really be a sequel to tAoL?
date
newest »



Thank you for the information!
After reading tAoL I personally would prefer it to have remained a single book, I feel as if it lacked the depth which in my opinion made the first Mistborn trilogy so good.
Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed the Alloy of Law, I thought it was a great book, I just can't see it evolving anywhere from here...

I personally can't wait for this second book because I loved everything about The Alloy of Law. The story still has a lot of potential, and the characters were just to damned likeable to be left without a sequel.


all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
I always thought that tAoL was a stand alone book, in between trilogies 1 and 2 of Sanderson's proposed trilogy-of-trilogies.
Is Shadows of Self to be a sequel, or simply the first instalment of the second urban-era'd trilogy of Mistborn books?
What do you think? Are there any sources on this?
Sanderson himself has confirmed that "the second Alloy of Law" will be called Shadows of Self, but by this does he mean the second stand alone title based around the mythology, or a direct sequel?