Gore and More discussion
General Horror Chat
>
Talk about the genre...
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kevin
(new)
Apr 03, 2013 02:06PM

reply
|
flag
Personally, I think the horror genre peaked in the late 70's, early 80's. With monster hits like Halloween, Dawn Of The Dead, Friday The 13TH, The Shining....the great horror classics just kept coming and coming.
Modern horror is not as good as retro horror. The odd films like Insidious, Paranormal Activity, Orphan and a few others are frightening, but for the most part I've become desenitized to horror.
These bloody awful remakes and sequels...stop already! Give us something original and actually scary!
Modern horror is not as good as retro horror. The odd films like Insidious, Paranormal Activity, Orphan and a few others are frightening, but for the most part I've become desenitized to horror.
These bloody awful remakes and sequels...stop already! Give us something original and actually scary!
The books are faring better than the films for sure. I still prefer horror books from the 80's.
Being a child of the 80's, I guess it's part nostalgia with me. I like the horror of that era.
Stoker is the KING of the vampire story. Anne Rice's Lestat is excellent, too.
Agreed. The original Dracula is the best by far.

To me, most modern movies rely to heavily on being in your face with blood and guts. It gets to a point with me when that becomes just gross and repetitive.
Too true, Jennifer. I like horror movies where I don't always see what's happening. It has that scary 'where are they? What's going to happen next?" appeal.
I was a gorehound in my teens. Now I believe less gore is more.
I was a gorehound in my teens. Now I believe less gore is more.
Well, the slasher films from the 80’s weren’t written well at all, it was all about the shower scenes and boob count and some loony hunting down the naked college coeds.
IMO, one of the best horror movie ever made was ALIEN, I know it is a sci-fi movie, but it is also a great horror movie. I also like JAWS quite a bit, not seeing the shark until the end really created tension.
Too much gore in movies turns me off, the wife and I couldn’t sit through SAW or HOSTEL.
IMO, one of the best horror movie ever made was ALIEN, I know it is a sci-fi movie, but it is also a great horror movie. I also like JAWS quite a bit, not seeing the shark until the end really created tension.
Too much gore in movies turns me off, the wife and I couldn’t sit through SAW or HOSTEL.
Alien, Halloween, The Other....My favorites.
LOVED Alien and Aliens.
LOVED Alien and Aliens.

IMO, one of the best horro..."
Those slasher films were aimed at teenage adolescent boys. I enjoyed them when I was young. Nothing wrong with a high boob count. ;-)

Ever since Scream, bad horror movies have been too self-aware, and all of them try to be parodies and suck at it.
When you try to make a movie so bad it's good, you usually fail.
What made the old dumb flicks great was that they weren't afraid to be insane.
Think of Lifeforce. Yes, it was full of gratuitous nudity and has a blood shower... but it is great because it's crazy. And a lot of that craziness was stuff you just can't plan (not enough money to make the whole movie).
And, yes, for the bad movie subtype, the days of creative special effects were a major boon. The cheap CGI of today ruins a lot of that.

I have found that as I get older I watch less and less horror films. They just don't have the power to scare me anymore so they are kind of pointless now. The Conjuring is a good example.........most people loved this movie. I thought that the first hour was good, but a fun haunted house movie instantly turned into a steaming pile with the arrival of the Warrens. Horror films lose their power when the watchers start giggling.

Gore is like any other type of horror, it's a theme. You coat a little bit of it here and there along with the rest of your horror devices and you have a solid horror story or movie. You simply use gore and you may lose people, gross them out or just turn them off and not want to continue with such a product. Build up is also essential to the presence of horror, there's needs to be a build-up in order for the horror to resonate. I believe horror has definitely defined itself over the years and today it's one of the most popular genres because people find themselves not being able to get enough of it.

I think there is a place for gore in the horror genre, but it's not my favorite spot. My love of horror mostly lies in the atmospheric. I have noticed since the 80's that the popularity of horror waxes and wanes, but not as predictably as the moon does.
Brian Keene recently made a post to horror writers to cheer up! He states that horror always does well under Republican administrations and I've been thinking about whether or not it is true. I think it is.

I think there is a place for gore in the..."
Exactly. Your like me, you like something to go with the gore. Just slapping it everywhere and only using it as the sole theme creates messiness. It's good if there's a balance and also like you said this group delivers on that balance.

Barker, Skipp and Spector, all those guys rose up during that time. But I suspect it flamed out early because gore can only take you so far. There needs to be a substantial framework around it. Some of the authors of that time, like Barker, had the chops to write whatever he wanted and still be successful. For some of the other authors of that time, not so much.
And maybe Splatterpunk hasn't flamed out so much as...changed. Now we have authors like Wrath James White, Carlton Mellick and Edward Lee writing bizarro and extremely graphic horror that seems to have built up a solid fan base.
I guess I'm arguing that gore for gore's sake does seem to have a place in both books and film. Maybe it's not our place, but it's a place and it looks like it's here to stay.
Its all about the story and characters. You can put lipstick on a pig, but its still a pig. The same is true for horror. Gore can compliment a good story and be used for emphasis to drive that point home. But, if you don't have substance there, it's just lipstick on that pig. Now, I know many love buckets and buckets of gore in their stories (and movies), but I've read stories where it was page after page of one long scene of killing after killing, the next one more graphic than the next, and it simply numbs me. The shock and horror go away. I've seen too much. For me, a few well placed horrific moments with gore, and the rest is a well-crafted story, has a much greater impact on me.

It may not be my thing, but there is definitely still a market for splatter and torture porn. It sells!



In most of the horror books I read, I lean more toward the atmosphere and spine chilling stories that wrap themselves around your soul and doesn't let you go. As far as I am concerned, give me a ghost story any day.


Brad, I am sure there are many ways. Depends on the author. I am sure I have read many gory tales in my youth (just cannot remember them all)


