SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion
TV and Movie Chat
>
Defiance Stunner or Stinker?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Patgolfneb
(new)
Apr 15, 2013 05:06PM

reply
|
flag




However, one thing really got to me. Is it just me, or did they totally gloss over the fact that someone murdered their sheriff? I mean everyone is screaming that the law keeper is dead and when we return from the commercial, everyone is arguing about who could've killed the kid. No one hardly even talks about the law keeper, whose corpse is right there on the floor. I know that the event was necessary to give the main character a reason to stay in Defiance, but it seemed kind of lazy not to roll that into the story.
Other than that, I think they are laying some pretty good groundwork for an interesting series.




Completely agree with the person who noticed the terraforming of Terra. Major SF faus pax there. The backstory not included in the pilot episode but available online via other sources explains that situation.
I'll watch a couple of more espidoes, but to be completely honest, Syfy has pissed me off too much by cancelling good shows early (Stargate: Universe; Caprica; etc.) so I don't have high hopes for this series. Why should I invest my time in it if Syfy will just kill it next year or the year after?

I'll watch a couple of more espidoes, but to be completely honest, Syfy has pissed me off too much by cancelling good shows early (Stargate: Universe; Caprica; etc.) so I don't have high hopes for this series. Why should I invest my time in it if Syfy will just kill it next year or the year after? "
I agree. The "terraforming" bit jarred me right out of the story line, so I missed the next couple of items. What nitwit editor missed that?
Every show you and I ever liked, eventually died. Some after less than a season and some after a decade. But eventually, all shows die. I guess the answer is to enjoy a story while it's here. With SyFy we have to enjoy it FAST, because if the production costs are high, they'll drop it faster than a mouse leaving a cat convention and replace it with rasslin' (or some other form of cheap fiction).
I'm still hacked off over Eureka.

I gave them a pass on "terraforming" because there is no other single word in our language that would convey the same idea quickly without a lot of extra explanation that they didn't have time for in the voiceover....but the debris thing was inexcusable! :)





Some of the acting was deplorable, and I don't want to say anything bad about particular actors or actresses, but I think there was a lot of bad casting here. However, I loved how odd and inscrutable Irisa is. And the Indogene doctor is great.
I have a ready word for the alien version of terraforming from a human point of view. Xenoforming. Wouldn't we have understood that?





to watch or not to watch .... as others have commented, there have been a lot of sci fi series that started poorly but became very good in later seasons. i'd say S.T.N.G. was mediocre until season 3. Bab5 had some really poor episodes in season 1 and even Battlestar Galactica's first season is a little weak compared to what came later. I like to give sci fi series the benefit of the doubt. I will definitely watch first season.
also, i agree with the earlier comments about the doctor - she is the most interesting of all the characters.


Deciding whether it's good at this point is like looking at a baker's mixing bowl of ingredients and judging whether the cake will be any good. You may get a hint if you see ingredients you like or dislike, but you just don't know what the whole thing will taste like yet.

Boy-howdy is THAT analogy ever wrong.
A show that's on the air? That's a finished meal. It's done.
The proper "ingredients" analogy is like looking at the first draft of the script and basing your judgement of what the final product -- the "meal" -- will taste like just on that. Have you seen the first version of The Incredibles? Not only would that taste like crap, it would've given you food poisoning. But when you saw The Incredibles in the theatre, that was a full meal. You aren't waiting for the fourth sequel to decide if you like it or not.
Now, an ongoing series is different from a movie in that it's more like an Italian 12-course meal that lasts all night and you may have items or even whole courses you dislike, but you'll know right away if it's any good, even if the desert is terrible. (Or doesn't show up at all, as is so often the case.)
