Catching up on Classics (and lots more!) discussion

This topic is about
A Tree Grows in Brooklyn
New School Classics- 1915-2005
>
A Tree Grows in Brooklyn - Spoilers
message 2:
by
Katy, Quarterly Long Reads
(last edited Sep 20, 2014 04:35PM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
message 3:
by
Katy, Quarterly Long Reads
(last edited Sep 20, 2014 04:35PM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Some of you might prefer to use questions to help guide the discussion of the book. If so, I have some listed below; if not -- just ignore this post.
Discussion Questions
(view spoiler)
Discussion Questions
(view spoiler)
message 4:
by
Katy, Quarterly Long Reads
(last edited Dec 20, 2016 01:53PM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
My copy of A Tree Grows in Brooklyn has less than 500 pages (489) so I think that one month should give us time to read it. That would be about 15-16 pages a day.
Here is a schedule to help you finish by the end of the month.
May 5 - 11: Discuss Chapters 1 - 14
May 12 - 18: Discuss Chapters 15 - 32
May 19 - 25: Discuss Chapters 33 - 43
May 26 - 31: Discuss Chapters 44 - 56 (end of book)
No Spoilers Discussion
Of course you can read at any pace you want, but please don't post spoilers ahead in the discussion for those still reading.
Here is a schedule to help you finish by the end of the month.
May 5 - 11: Discuss Chapters 1 - 14
May 12 - 18: Discuss Chapters 15 - 32
May 19 - 25: Discuss Chapters 33 - 43
May 26 - 31: Discuss Chapters 44 - 56 (end of book)
No Spoilers Discussion
Of course you can read at any pace you want, but please don't post spoilers ahead in the discussion for those still reading.
message 5:
by
Katy, Quarterly Long Reads
(last edited Sep 20, 2014 04:35PM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Context of the Book
(view spoiler) ["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
(view spoiler) ["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
message 6:
by
Katy, Quarterly Long Reads
(last edited May 01, 2013 09:11AM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
A couple of YouTube clips from the movie:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-eFOJ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ix3zZ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-eFOJ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ix3zZ...
message 9:
by
Katy, Quarterly Long Reads
(last edited May 17, 2013 08:51PM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
The Tree Still Grows in Brooklyn by Robert Cornfield
Betty Smith was five years older than her creation, Francie Nolan, who was born in 1901. Francie was the tree that grew in Brooklyn, the one that blossomed out of the pavements, whose strength was not recognized because the breed was so common. ''It grew in boarded-up lots and out of neglected rubbish heaps and it was the only tree that grew out of cement.'' ''A Tree Grows in Brooklyn,'' published in 1943, was an immediate best seller, and since then has become for its devoted readers a treasured rite of passage. A friend told me it was where she first learned at 12 about sex. Another reader was dismayed to realize that her mother had purloined incidents from Francie's childhood and made them her own, telling her daughter tales from the book as if she had lived them herself. The novelist Helen Schulman would read the book again and again, never finishing, each time starting from the beginning so that for her the book never ended.
More: http://www.nytimes.com/books/99/01/03...
Betty Smith was five years older than her creation, Francie Nolan, who was born in 1901. Francie was the tree that grew in Brooklyn, the one that blossomed out of the pavements, whose strength was not recognized because the breed was so common. ''It grew in boarded-up lots and out of neglected rubbish heaps and it was the only tree that grew out of cement.'' ''A Tree Grows in Brooklyn,'' published in 1943, was an immediate best seller, and since then has become for its devoted readers a treasured rite of passage. A friend told me it was where she first learned at 12 about sex. Another reader was dismayed to realize that her mother had purloined incidents from Francie's childhood and made them her own, telling her daughter tales from the book as if she had lived them herself. The novelist Helen Schulman would read the book again and again, never finishing, each time starting from the beginning so that for her the book never ended.
More: http://www.nytimes.com/books/99/01/03...

Again, an excellent effort!
Cleo wrote: "Wow, Kathy! I just found this thread and am so impressed with the job you're doing leading this discussion. I wished I knew you were leading and going into such detail as I would have certainly p..."
Thanks Cleo! I appreciate the support.
Who knows, maybe you will have time later and can come back -- either reading the book or just read the posts.
Thanks Cleo! I appreciate the support.
Who knows, maybe you will have time later and can come back -- either reading the book or just read the posts.
Any last thoughts on the book?
I did like this book, and the description of the poverty in Brooklyn at the time. I especially enjoyed Francie and Aunt Sissy. To me they seemed the most "real" as characters.
I did like this book, and the description of the poverty in Brooklyn at the time. I especially enjoyed Francie and Aunt Sissy. To me they seemed the most "real" as characters.


So glad to see that we have buddy read for this book. The 2013 discussion was pretty one-sided. I hope you all enjoy the book as much as I did.









Oh I don't take notes, ever. I only highlight direct quotes I like when I read on Kindle because it's effortless. I feel like years forward I may want to look back on them. I guess it would also be good for reviews if you wanted to put a direct quote in there. I hardly ever get around to writing reviews (other than 2 or 3 line brief thoughts . I have to get better about doing that! Right now, I'm so addicted to reading that I'd rather spend free time reading than writing reviews. Next year I need to challenge myself to writing a certain percentage of reviews or something.


Wow that's fast Brina! I thought I was going fast. It will be a few more days for me. I've had a kindle for many years, but only recently started to embrace it because many of the Classics are free or super cheap for Kindle (99cents). I've always liked it for travel, which until joining this group last June, is pretty much the only time I used it in the past. The really cool thing is that since Amazon and Kindle are owned by the same company now, your highlights can appear under your review for all to see. You can choose one by one which ones to reveal to your friends and people can comment on the quotes too. That's only happened a couple times for me (that's how I found out people could comment) . It's still in Beta and many aren't used to it yet. Here are my highlights so far https://www.goodreads.com/notes/54870...


It has been some time since I read a coming of age novel, and I just love how this one reads. You can tell Betty Smith wrote from her heart.
Anyway, did any of you have a favorite character or one who you related with more than others as you read?




I agree with you guys about Sissy. She was the best. For me, I'm glad I read it now. I wouldn't have related to it when I was young because I was a Tom boy, out playing every different sport, was very social and never bullied (though I stuck up for those who were bullied). Francie did remind me a lot of my sister though. I also felt like my parents loved all of us the same even though my sister, being the youngest was favored.
There's a difference between being favored and being loved more and I kind of think Betty Smith may have got the two confused. In my experience with my own family and many friends, boys often bond more with mothers and girls with fathers. If there are two of the same sex, usually one bonds more with a different parent. (of course there are lots of exceptions because personality plays a large part) In my case, being the middle child who didn't have any social or academic problems, I got the least attention by far of the 3 of us, but I didn't feel less loved. Later I had a step family and that was way different of course.
One of my friends who had two girls said once that one was her pride and the other her joy. I think that explains it perfectly. Most people love them the same but treat them differently based on their personalities. Stronger more independent one's get less attention because they don't need it as much. Of course there are abusive parents and some who really do not love their children the same, but I really didn't get that sense with Katie despite the author writing it that way, The examples felt to me to be the way my little sister was favored. Plus, people had kids so young (even my parents generation) and they got better with each one. They were more mature with each one and learned from mistakes made on the earlier children.


I wouldn't have known that Brina! We have another thing in common. I used to think that most women who liked baseball were Tomboys growing up, but my niece loves baseball and she's pretty girly. I didn't like to read at all (as I recall anyway) until Jr. High and then I read Steven King and other Horror type books. I needed that adrenaline to keep my attention as I was (and still am) ADD. This group has been so great because it's allowed me to embrace my inner introvert.


Sue and Brina,
I was also a tomboy when I was younger! Most of the time I hung out with the boys. I was bullied, so I did relate to Francie in this way. Girls were the worst of it! I loved reading and wrote quite a bit growing up, so I also connected with her there. As for whether I would've enjoyed this as a teen, I'm not certain. I would just love to know what young Emily would've made of this novel!

(I'm going to wait to read the comments above until I'm further along.)


I'm the same way Francisca, don't like to read comments or reviews until I've read it. Hope you like it as much as we did.


I think my favorite part was really the way that Smith really makes 1910's Brooklyn real - as if you could go and walk down the street and meet some of these characters. (Maybe this is in part because it's semi-autobiographical.) And (despite coming from a completely different background) I found myself identifying a lot with Francie, also in the love for reading and writing but also in feeling a bit outside the crowd growing up.
I agree with Sue on the favoring vs loving more - I think Katie actually puts it well, when she decides to send Neeley to highschool instead of Francie because Francie will fight her way to go back to school while Neeley wouldn't. Different children have different needs, and it'd be silly to treat them all exactly the same. And in my family, my mom gets along better with my brother and I tend to get along better with my dad, though we both know we're well-loved. As a kid though, some of those little differences can really hurt; maybe that's why Betty Smith conflates the two a bit.
Another aspect of the book I really enjoyed is simply that I think it's one of the best "coming of age" stories I've read. She really does an amazing job of depicting that slow growing in understanding of the world around us and how everything relates - like in the scene about the North Pole game.
I should probably finish my lunch break now... I just wanted to share some of my thoughts! :)
Books mentioned in this topic
Angela’s Ashes (other topics)A Tree Grows in Brooklyn (other topics)
A Tree Grows in Brooklyn (other topics)
Angela’s Ashes (other topics)
Tomorrow Will Be Better (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Betty Smith (other topics)Betty Smith (other topics)
Looking forward to this reread. Come and join me in another discussion of the book.