Sword & Sorcery: "An earthier sort of fantasy" discussion

This topic is about
The Hammer and the Blade
Authors, Books and Series
>
[Series] Egil and Nix
date
newest »

Thank you for introducing your heroic duo. I'm intrigued by the "Momentary God", so may I ask how magic & religion (the "sorcery" in S&S) are featured in the series?
As for the "swords" part, it's illustrated on the book's evocative cover:
[open the image in a new tab, to view a higher resolution]
***
Links of interest:
*The Hammer and The Blade - Pocast on Functional Nerds
*Howard Andrew Jones and Paul S. Kemp - Pocast on Functional Nerds
*Paul Weimer's review of The Hammer and The Blade
As for the "swords" part, it's illustrated on the book's evocative cover:

[open the image in a new tab, to view a higher resolution]
***
Links of interest:
*The Hammer and The Blade - Pocast on Functional Nerds
*Howard Andrew Jones and Paul S. Kemp - Pocast on Functional Nerds
*Paul Weimer's review of The Hammer and The Blade

Egil is a congregation of one, the lone "priest" of a dead god. His worship grants him no powers and no worldly authority. In fact, it sometimes gets him into mischief. But the notion of achieving one's life's desire, even if only for a moment, a moment that results in death, appeals to Egil for reasons I won't spoil here. :-)
As for magic and how it works: I deliberately chose to portray it the way it's portrayed in REH's Conan stories, or the Thieves' World anthologies -- there's no discernible system as such (save that most of it uses some variant of the Language of Creation). Think of Sanctuary with its Purple Mage and his spiders, the Blue Star Adepts, Lalo the Limner's magic paint, etc.
Magic is wondrous, unpredictable, and, in general, is not to be trusted. I very much wanted to portray it as a wild force, inscrutable (for the most part) to the heroes. I really like that vibe. I think it's much more sympatico with S&S than is systematized magic, which sometimes feels to me a bit too modern, more like technology or science.
True, Nix uses magic sometimes, though he doesn't always understand what he's doing and doesn't always get the outcome he wishes.
:-)

Me, I quite enjoyed Hammer and the Blade and am looking forward to Discourse in Steel and (now that I've seen the title) Conversation in Blood and anything that may come after that.

Much obliged, Joe.

I thought I'd mention that Tor.com has posted the first chapter of A Discourse in Steel: A Tale of Egil and Nix, the second tale of Egil and Nix. It contains no spoilers (either for Discourse or for The Hammer and the Blade, which is the first tale of Egil and Nix).
Link: http://www.tor.com/stories/2013/05/a-...
I hope you'll give it a looksee. :-)
Paul

I wanted to mention that I'm giving away two copies of my sword and sorcery novel, A Discourse in Steel, the second tale of Egil and Nix.
Details: http://www.goodreads.com/giveaway/sho...

It isn't, no. They're each standalone.

It isn't, no. They're each standalone."
Entered. If I'd known they were standalone, I would have snapped it up on Netgalley when it was available.

Paul
Books mentioned in this topic
A Discourse in Steel (other topics)A Discourse in Steel (other topics)
The Hammer and the Blade (other topics)
The Hammer and the Blade (other topics)
A Discourse in Steel (other topics)
So, who the Hell are these guys? Well, they're longtime friends, experienced tomb robbers, rakes and ne'er do wells who drink and womanize a bit more than is good for them.
Nix is a sneak-thief, a one-time student of the Conclave (ere being expelled), and his speed and precision of his blade work is matched only by the speed and precision of his wit.
Egil is a hulking priest, the more solemn of the pair, and a follower of the Momentary God.
Nix loves to talk, and is more than willing to rely on a cutting word. Egil, on the other hand, lets his hammers give his sermons.
Egil and Nix are more than a little acquainted with trouble, which seems to find them irrespective of their intentions.
So, that's the boys. Let me say a short bit about what I'm trying to do with these books.
Essentially, I want to tell ripping yarns with deft dialog and rapid pacing. I want to recall the vigor, the sense of wonder I felt when first reading Leiber and Brackett and Howard and Burroughs -- just unabashed adventures that are a blast to read. And I want to do that while at the same time modernizing the prose and thematic elements somewhat.
Happy to answer any questions. Meanwhile, I hope you'll give the duo a try. :-)
Paul