Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Policies & Practices
>
"Spoiler" question
date
newest »

The description comes straight from the publisher. I'd leave it be.
Spoilers in descriptions from users are fair game for removal. Ones that come from the publisher usually aren't.
Spoilers in descriptions from users are fair game for removal. Ones that come from the publisher usually aren't.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/boo...
and this one:
http://gawker.com/dont-ask-questions-...
The author website also avoids the spoiler, at least on the front page:
http://karenjoyfowler.com/
It is a huge spoiler. Could we use the blurb from the author site rather than the publisher?
Banjomike wrote: "Could we use the blurb from the author site rather than the publisher?"
That seems reasonable.
That seems reasonable.


In this specific case almost the entire blurb is a spoiler. I've replaced the default blurb with the one from the author site.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/16...
To be honest, I probably wouldn't have read the book if I hadn't known about it ahead of time, and in fact some editions apparently reveal it in the cover blurb (although my copy doesn't) so it's debatable whether this is actually a spoiler. But it's clear from reading the book that the author did not intend for it to be known ahead of time.
So to get to the point, the Goodreads description of the book includes this "spoiler." I'm thinking that mention should be deleted. Any objections or other input from readers who already know what I'm taking about? I recently got librarian privileges and will be happy to take care of it; just wanted some input from some veteran librarians first if possible.
Thanks!