ROBUST discussion
Book Talk & Exchange of Views
>
Kristine Katherine Rusch on writing as a career vs a bucket list item
date
newest »

It's a good point.
A writer writes because he has a story to tell and wants to tell it.
Pseuds are more interested in the peripheral activities that real writers see as an interference in their writing time; they'd get someone to ghostwrite "their" book if they could afford it.
A writer writes because he has a story to tell and wants to tell it.
Pseuds are more interested in the peripheral activities that real writers see as an interference in their writing time; they'd get someone to ghostwrite "their" book if they could afford it.

There are those who go to conventions to pose as writers, or as self-flagellation, and then are those who stay at home and write.
I've been to two conventions in my life, and that was already one too many. Of course, I was paid to go, but the money was little consolation for a depressing experience watching third and fourth rate agents prey on the dreams of aspirant writers.
I've been to two conventions in my life, and that was already one too many. Of course, I was paid to go, but the money was little consolation for a depressing experience watching third and fourth rate agents prey on the dreams of aspirant writers.

I don't think I'd go to one now.
About Trotsky in Mexico: it's a really humiliating end for a socialist to be killed with an icepick, the symbol of middle-class martini-drinking decadence!

I don't think I'd go to one now."
Well, I was speaking more of writing conventions really.
I haven't been to any sort of more geeky sort of convention in a rather long time, though I did tend to enjoy them as I spent time around my co-religionists as it were. It's more a thing for the young, if only because I get tired easily and being in large crowds annoy me. :)
As for writing cons,
When I first started looking into publishing, everyone kept saying how important they were, but they mainly seemed like spending a lot of money to be told stuff I could read for free on the internet or the chance. People used to go on about agent and editor contact, but I don't know if it's worth several hundred dollars since it doesn't necessarily change your chances that much (and that's back when I cared about agents).
I was very disappointed to discover that writers' conferences aren't one long orgy. I mean, all my life I've been hearing about the "author lifestyle" and all my life I have been working fourteen hours a day, just like I used to when I was a merchant banker or when I worked in advertising, so when does the orgy start? Why do I get invited to speak only at the conferences of Elderly Spinsters with Tight Underclothes?
And notice that it isn't even Elderly Spinsters IN Tight Underclothes, oh no, it's been censored to the far less exciting Elderly Spinsters WITH Tight Underclothes. I think somebody's got it in for me...
A phrase you hear often on KB is "living the writer lifestyle". I heard it recently from a pornographer who claimed he was "saving literature" -- and he wasn't joking, he meant it! And from a poet so unprofessional he claimed he sent his poems to 60 publishers: there aren't sixty publishers of poetry in all the world, so he must have been sending poetry to publishers who have zero interest in poetry. He too claimed he was saving literature. But these guys actually want to write, and for people to read what they write. There are many others who hate writing but would love to be the centre of attraction, which they fondly imagine writers are because they are writers. It isn't true, of course; most writers are not the centre of attraction, and those who are the soul of the party are witty, not dead earnest like the wannabes, and were charismatic before they became writers. The test is whether, if they could be writers without the bother of writing anything, they would still want to be writers. If the answer is yes, they aren't writers but posers

Andre hasn't told the story here, but in his Writing a Thriller he tells of sitting in a bar in Melbourne with a Nobel Prize winner, who said offhand, something I'll paraphrase as, "Oh, within a few square blocks of this bar live a hundred writers better than any of us. The only difference is we write a few thousand words every day and they don't."
It could be true. There's a certain amount of talent involved, but in the main it is just plain hard work until you get it right. Not so much different from engineering!

Anyways, I'm a legend in my own mind.
Does that sound artsy enough to pass for a writer? Or do I actually have to sell books too??
:P
K. A. wrote: "Anyways, I'm a legend in my own mind.
I'd be perfectly satisfied being a legend in my bank account.
I'd be perfectly satisfied being a legend in my bank account.


Kench!
I just had a visit from a friend from Devon who complained that Vancouverites don't dress up for the street. What would one expect from a) The city whose inhabitants are called 'granolas' by Canada's easterners (meaning, as I had to explain to her, we are outdoorsy folk and we tend to eat healthy), and b) the city in which Lulu Lemon garments were founded and are still largely constructed. Of course she could not resist hugging its ancient trees when I schlepped her off to Stanley Park, and had the good sense to wear sturdy slacks and boots.

I wish I had my bloodstained bomber jacket back, now that I'm such an artiste. Maybe I'll buy another one, and thigh boots to go with it, and move to Vancouver...
She makes a distinction between people who want to write as a career and people who just want to get prestige by having a book published.