Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

54 views
Policies & Practices > Two-Volume Editions

Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Yakamoz (new)

Yakamoz | 23 comments I'm not sure what to do with the books with two volumes. Am I supposed to add them as a single book or?..


message 2: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
That depends on how they were published. If they were published as the set, they get added as a single entry.

If each volume was published separately, it gets added as a separate entry here as well.


message 3: by Yakamoz (new)

Yakamoz | 23 comments rivka wrote: "That depends on how they were published. If they were published as the set, they get added as a single entry.

If each volume was published separately, it gets added as a separate entry here as well."


Thank you.


message 4: by Jørgen (new)

Jørgen (jokjo) | 55 comments Simanur wrote: "I'm not sure what to do with the books with two volumes. Am I supposed to add them as a single book or?.."

Can I have this specified out, please?

I have a book that came in a three volume edition (all with different ISBN) - they go into separate "books"?
And also have books that goes in a two and three volume with only one or none ISBNs (some of my books are very old) - they go into one?

I am a bit shaky about if they should be added as separate editions of the same book even...?
Example: "Book A". Editions "Book A - Vol. 1", "Book A - Vol. 2", "Book A", "Book A", "Buch A", "Kniga A"
The example above shows Book A with a two vol. edition, a combined edition, a German, and a Russian edition (with it's German and Russian titles)

Or if it shoul be
"Book A" - Editions: "Book A", "Buch A", "Kniga A"
"Book A - Vol. 1 (Book A, #1)" Editions: "Book A - Vol 1"
"Book A - Vol. 2 (Book A, #2)" Editions: "Book A - Vol 2"


message 5: by amaldae (new)

amaldae (staticatku) | 593 comments Yes, yes, and option B.


message 6: by Jørgen (new)

Jørgen (jokjo) | 55 comments Thank you! :)


message 7: by Taru (new)

Taru | 9 comments Sorry for not getting this, but I have a Finnish edition of Don Quixote in 3 parts which all have different ISBN.
So I understand should add them as separate books: Don Quijote 1 (Don Quijote #1), Don Quijote 2 (Don Quijote #2), Don Quijote 3 (Don Quijote #3)?
Or do I use "Don Quixote #1" instead of the translation "Don Quijote #1"?
And are all of these supposed to be added as a new edition of Don Quixote?
I'm confused, sorry. Feel free to educate me. :D I'm trying to make sense of this before adding and having to ask for librarians to fix everything... lol


message 8: by amaldae (last edited Aug 06, 2015 11:24AM) (new)

amaldae (staticatku) | 593 comments yes, do add them as distinct works - we only combine books which have the same content. in this instance, I think a 3-part series might also be created.

please enter the title as it is shown on the books' covers and set edition language to Finnish.


message 9: by Taru (new)

Taru | 9 comments Kiitos Scylla! :)


Elizabeth (Alaska) Scylla wrote: "I think a 3-part series might also be created."

I believe this is not accepted practice, and would like to hear Rivka weigh in.


message 11: by amaldae (new)

amaldae (staticatku) | 593 comments Elizabeth (Alaska) wrote: "Scylla wrote: "I think a 3-part series might also be created."

I believe this is not accepted practice, and would like to hear Rivka weigh in."


I think have seen series created in such cases, but you're right, it might not be an official practice and I wouldn't try to implement it without asking first. :-)


message 12: by Empress (last edited Aug 06, 2015 12:21PM) (new)

Empress (the_empress) Taru wrote: "So I understand should add them as separate books: Don Quijote 1 (Don Quijote #1), Don Quijote 2 (Don Quijote #2), Don Quijote 3 (Don Quijote #3)? "

it's better if you add them as :

(Edited)
Don Quijote 1 (Don Quijote, #1 of 3)
Don Quijote 2 (Don Quijote, #2 of 3)
Don Quijote 3 (Don Quijote, #3 of 3)

Otherwise it might get combined with other version of the book (different separation)

I think series are allowed without adding the original book (whole volume).


message 13: by Paula (new)

Paula (paulaan) | 7014 comments Yes, there is precedent to use the series function to link parts of a book together


Elizabeth (Alaska) Paula wrote: "Yes, there is precedent to use the series function to link parts of a book together"

Ok, I remember a big discussion on Anna Karenina (I think it was) and the series was deleted. But my memory has been faulty in the past.


message 15: by Paula (new)

Paula (paulaan) | 7014 comments don't remember seeing that discussion, but msgs 55 and 56 show rivka agreeing that the whole book should not be part of a series that is being used to group parts together

https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...


Elizabeth (Alaska) Thanks, Paula - glad you could find this relatively easily.

I note her clear response here.
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...


back to top