Its slowly dawned on me that, as fans of thrillers/mystery/crime novels (not just fans comprising this 'group' but fans throughout Goodreads) we have been remiss in our loyalties.
We talk about these books at length--but have we even done basic diligence to make sure that the books are represented properly on this website?
I think what we all --each of us--might do, is to browse through all our own personal book shelves and identify any thriller/mystery/crime novel which--on its Goodreads pages--lacks a bookcover, lacks a book synopsis, has improper author info, or any other kind of presentational error.
Doesn't this make eminent good sense? Isn't it the right thing to do? I mean, every time I visit a page like that of one of my favorite thrillers (like, The Viking Process) and see a complete omission of plot-summary--what kind of fan am I?
Who agrees with me that we ought to help rectify this situation. Where do you stand?
We talk about these books at length--but have we even done basic diligence to make sure that the books are represented properly on this website?
I think what we all --each of us--might do, is to browse through all our own personal book shelves and identify any thriller/mystery/crime novel which--on its Goodreads pages--lacks a bookcover, lacks a book synopsis, has improper author info, or any other kind of presentational error.
Doesn't this make eminent good sense? Isn't it the right thing to do? I mean, every time I visit a page like that of one of my favorite thrillers (like, The Viking Process) and see a complete omission of plot-summary--what kind of fan am I?
Who agrees with me that we ought to help rectify this situation. Where do you stand?