Sci-fi and Heroic Fantasy discussion
General SF&F Chat
>
How do you write your book reviews?
date
newest »


I thought I was the only one who did that. I frequently give 4 and 5 star reviews (when they are good) but I seldom read those reviews. I want to know what wasn't done well and you usually only get that in the 3 star reviews. Frequently it was just personal taste and I often buy based on these reviews.
I personally do my reviews as more of a reminder to myself as to my overall thoughts on the book, a recap of the basic story, what was done well and/or poorly, and if I enjoyed it. I read so many stories I usually forget a lot of them a year or two later (no comments on this being age related, lol).

First, the setting is often unique and not within the know structure of the universe. Reading and reviewing a mystery novel based in 1930s New York is completely apart from a Fantasy novel set in a world made up in the Authors mind where even the simplest of scientific rules are not always followed.
Secondly, the characters in Fantasy and Sci-fi are more often experiencing the story alongside you (if that makes sense) and through many characters and places, and the feeling of without the characters, the story would go on (albeit very badly for the world), whereas in a mystery novel the story itself is wholly dependent on the protagonist.
Third, I invest more time in world building and string characters in Fantasy, more on scientif believability, imagination, and thought provoking issues in Sci-Fi, and more on crisp story arc, humor, and setting in other genres.
Mark E. Lein
https://borderleinpublishing.squaresp...

If I'm reviewing a non-fiction book, then I use my review to evaluate the author's argument. This is especially relevant if I'm reading a book written by a scientist that makes sneering remarks about philosophy: scientists are uniformly incompetent at philosophy, never having bothered to study it properly, and the puerility of their arguments is only matched by the insufferability of their arrogance.
If I'm reviewing fiction, I generally give a completely subjective reaction, because I have little skill as a literary critic, and my own feelings are really all I have to work with. If I love a book, it gets a glowing review and 5 stars. If I hate it, it may have won prizes everywhere and be universally regarded as the greatest work of literature in the last fifty years, but I will still give it only 1 star and be extremely rude about it.
If I'm reviewing fiction, I generally give a completely subjective reaction, because I have little skill as a literary critic, and my own feelings are really all I have to work with. If I love a book, it gets a glowing review and 5 stars. If I hate it, it may have won prizes everywhere and be universally regarded as the greatest work of literature in the last fifty years, but I will still give it only 1 star and be extremely rude about it.

I admire anyone who can write a well thought out review. Whenever I am reading reviews about a book I'm thinking of buying, I usually gravitate to the three star reviews, or any written with a more balanced viewpoint, listing pros and cons.