Language & Grammar discussion
Grammar Central
>
How many do you know?
date
newest »

Interesting that feckless and fecklessness are both there! I knew parlous, but there were others that were new to me......and interesting too that both swine and pandemic were there.
They've got links to the words and can track when people click for definitions. But damned if I know how they know who.
Same way Big Brother Google knows. ISPs, etc. Except Google stores your searches forever, ready to share with the Feds (or others) if necessary. Not sure about the NYT.

A cautionary tale...

That is perplexing. I wonder if that has to do with context. Maybe it was used in a sentence that seemed to infer an alternate meaning.

"Ersatz" is a word I've never had trouble with, but I've heard many people friends get confused over it. Besides swine, I can't believe so many people don't know "glut" or "antebellum"; I think the reason "pandemic" is on the list is that the mass media abuses the word to sensationalize every illness, so people are trying to figure out the difference between it and "epidemic."

I learned solipsistic from that classic solipsist himself, Leo Tolstoy. Come to think of it, MOST writers would come under the dogegory of "solipsist," no?

grebrim wrote: "Btw, English is by far the wordiest language I know. I've read once that the biggest English dictionary had three times the number of words the biggest French one has. On the other hand, English gr..."
My husband, who grew up in Norway, is always remarking at the size of an American dictionary compared to a Norewegian one.
My husband, who grew up in Norway, is always remarking at the size of an American dictionary compared to a Norewegian one.

Before the Norman invasion of 1066, English was based on Anglo-Saxon words, a Germantic language. Then the Normans brought their Norman-French, another hybrid of Latin (French) and Norse. Instead of one language taking over, all the language were used, with the latin-rooted word being the language of the aristocracy & all the wanna-be aristocrats. The anglo Saxon was preferred by those who resented the invaders & used an "English for the English" vocabulary. In time one large, clumsy but interesting language emerged. Add all the "Americanisms" picked up from various ethnic groups & the language grows even richer.
Yes, old William (such an English name for a French invader) really threw our language for a loop.
And I see echoes between the Americans and the Anglo-Saxons. We do it our way.
And I see echoes between the Americans and the Anglo-Saxons. We do it our way.

http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/ny-t...