Science and Natural History discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archived
>
Group Read Nominations for March 2014
date
newest »

I've come to the conclusion that 4 suggestions are somewhat few, and closing the nominations for March thus would be premature. The topic will be open to Saturday.



1: I would propose any of the books by Jean-Henri Fabre, preferably, though not necessarily, translated by Alexander Teixeira de Mattos, and if possible not modern anthologies. Practically all are available for downloading from:
https://archive.org/search.php?query=...
2: A much-neglected writer is R.V.Jones. How about his "Reflections on Intelligence" Available on Amazon. EVERYTHING he wrote was deep, fresh and entertaining.
3:Konrad Lorenz "King Solomon's Ring"


I 2nd this one due to this review encouraging me in that direction:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
1. Bad Science, by Ben Goldacre
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
2. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, by Thomas Kuhn
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9...
3. Before Galileo: The Birth of Modern Science in Medieval Europe, by John Freely
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
2. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, by Thomas Kuhn
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9...
3. Before Galileo: The Birth of Modern Science in Medieval Europe, by John Freely
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

We have quite a number of suggestions now. 14. Here is the poll: https://www.goodreads.com/poll/show/9...
Open till noon 21.
Open till noon 21.
Jon wrote: "Do they have to be new books?
1: I would propose any of the books by Jean-Henri Fabre, preferably, though not necessarily, translated by Alexander Teixeira de Mattos, and if possible not modern an..."
While modern isn't really a requirement, it being a specific book is. Hopefully you can resubmit one next month.
1: I would propose any of the books by Jean-Henri Fabre, preferably, though not necessarily, translated by Alexander Teixeira de Mattos, and if possible not modern an..."
While modern isn't really a requirement, it being a specific book is. Hopefully you can resubmit one next month.
Magdalena wrote: "Why are the results of the polls hidden?"
To avoid the choices being influenced by the preliminary results. The thought being that people should choose the one they'd like the most.
To avoid the choices being influenced by the preliminary results. The thought being that people should choose the one they'd like the most.
Alright. Our book for March is Bad Science. 5 votes for, with the rest being rather evenly distributed.
The poll is for the record here: https://www.goodreads.com/poll/list/5...
And Group Read Nominations for April 2014 are here:
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
The poll is for the record here: https://www.goodreads.com/poll/list/5...
And Group Read Nominations for April 2014 are here:
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
Oné wrote: "Weird Life: The Search for Life That Is Very, Very Different from Our Own"
I'll carry it to the correct topic. As well as close and archive this one to avoid it happening again.
I'll carry it to the correct topic. As well as close and archive this one to avoid it happening again.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Weird Life: The Search for Life That Is Very, Very Different from Our Own (other topics)Weird Life: The Search for Life That Is Very, Very Different from Our Own (other topics)
Bad Science (other topics)
Eels: An Exploration, from New Zealand to the Sargasso, of the World's Most Mysterious Fish (other topics)
The Blank Slate : The Modern Denial of Human Nature (other topics)
More...
- Books must be nonfiction, within our general theme.
- Nominations are open until 10th of February.
- Please add suggestions using add book/author.
- No more than 3 book suggestions pr. person.
- All recommendations will be featured in a subsequent poll. Should have results for 16th or so.
- Feel free to pitch, especially in the comments at the poll.