THE Group for Authors! discussion

If you see anything amiss with this sentence, "Internet governance must continue to allow permissionless innovation through an enabling Internet environment.” you may leave a comment on Saturday and Sunday at

http://document.netmundial.br/1-inter...

It's in paragraph 13. Many copyright owners feel that gives too many rights to copyright infringers.

Huh? I am a PhD and this is still vague to me. Sorry.

And who takes responsibility in a permissionless environment? This is part of the problem now...

How could copyright infringement reasonably count as innovation? Surely it's the opposite. It's hard to know what is intended here.

The context has nothing to do with copyrights that I can see and it's as vague in context as it is out of context.

"Innovation" is coupled with "creativity" so it's not anything anyone could be opposed to in the extremely generalized context of "internet governance."