You'll love this one...!! A book club & more discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Chit Chat About Books
>
New Purchases - 2016

Some tragedies by Euripides"
Medea, by any chance? Or some of the others?


Some tragedies by Euripides"
Medea, by any chance? Or some of the others?"
Yeah, Medea, The Bacchae, and Iphigenia at Aulis.

Some tragedies by Euripides"
Medea, by any chance? Or some of the others?"
Yeah, Medea, The Bacchae, and Iphigenia at Aulis."
Gavin wrote: "Rusalka wrote: "Gavin wrote: "Bought these today:
Some tragedies by Euripides"
Medea, by any chance? Or some of the others?"
Yeah, Medea, The Bacchae, and Iphigenia at Aulis."
I have read all of those. And also saw the movie (teather style) with Irene Papas
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076208/
@Sandra, not weird at all (or else we are all weird)

Some tragedies by Euripides"
Medea, by any chance? Or some of the others?"
Yeah, Medea, The Bacchae, and Iphigenia at Aulis."
Enjoy!

Weird fact. We call Esquilo, Aeschylus. I've read his play Agamemnon.

If you haven't read any ancient Greek texts before, I would start with The Odyssey. It's a really easy intro, good story, epic poem, really enjoy it. Then if you read The Iliad that introduces you to some characters that come up again and again in Greek tragedies (Agamemnon, Cassandra, Clytemnestra for example) so that can be a good pathway. Also they are written as poems (or prose depending on the translation, but I like the poems), instead of plays.
Or you can start with Sophocles and do the Oedipus Rex route, as most people know the basic story. My personal favourite is the third play of that trilogy, Antigone.
But most of them will be written as plays, written like
Julie: blah blah blah
Ben: blah blah
Chorus: blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
So do be prepared for that.
But just my two cents. Sounds like Sandra and Mariab have read more for fun so may have much better intel that I will be stealing for myself.


I wondered about that when writing my post, but since the auto-correct didn't underlined in red, I didn't give it too much thought. Aeschylus looks more Greek actually.

Cherie, on that note, if you read the Oedipus trilogy, read them in order too. That's actually important as they directly reference things in the play before it.

I love that their names are translated!

Start with Antigone. Really. One of the best plays I've ever read, and that comes from someone forced to read it in 11th grade, who doesn't like or read plays. And it isn't an intimidating length.

The Crow Road by Iain Banks
Strange Tide by Christopher Fowler
A Nail Through the Heart by Timothy Hallinan
Everybody's Fool by Richard Russo; and
Journey Under the Midnight Sun by Keigo Higashino
heart be still.

Start with Antigone. Really. One of the best plays I've ever read, and that comes from someone forced to read it in 11th grade, who doesn't like or read..."
You're in the group. It totally involves you!
I love Antigone and completely agree, but you don't think it needs a little bit of the first two to explain some of the major issues? (notice me being super vague here). I had some of this explained to me also when I read it, but reading it alone, I would think you would need the background.

Start with Antigone. Really. One of the best plays I've ever read, and that comes from someone forced to read it in 11th grade, who doesn'..."
I understand where you're coming from, Rusalka. The basis for my recommendation is that, IMO, Antigone is quite accessible and if you get only what you get from it, you'll enjoy it and go back and read the prior 2 works. OTOH, in my experience, if someone gets bogged down in book 1 and puts it aside, and then never makes it to Antigone, it's a loss.
Philosophically, I sometimes think that perhaps more readers would read more classic and antique/foundational literature if they were nudged in the direction of the most accessible works and on-ramps. We (collectively) many times give them the optimal path to full understanding of a work, and - as they begin to feel like Sysiphus - they slip out the restroom window whilst we sit at the table waiting for them to return, metaphorically, and tell us how much they enjoyed the book, rather than come back to our table to say, "well that didn't work out well", lol. YMMV.

Perfect response. I was trying to think of how to word the same sentiment.
No horning in, just jumping in.

I completely agree about the accessibility issue. And I think that most people are daunted in someway by many reads, not just Greek classics, but classics in general, or medieval classics (I have owned a copy of Canterbury Tales for nearly 10 years) or whatever. For me, I like to know what is going on, it helps me understand. So I am a start from square one person, to build up knowledge to understand the better works. Different strokes for different folks. But on that, that's why I was suggesting the pathway through the epics as an alternative.
YMMV. We may need a metric conversion for that one. Your kilometreage may vary just doesn't really add up over here.

You can... horn... wherever you want? Just no, Rus. Stop.


That's me too! I need to start at the beginning and I just can't skip anything. And I'm not proud of it.
I can't say if I read Iliada and La Odisea before of after, since I read all in the same year. I was kind of obsess with Ancient Greece, so I can't really say.
I think that these two books can be intimidating for some readers (probably not Cherie) and put them off reading the whole thing.
I think that you can read tragedies without reading them. A version with some notes to get the background would be enough. Maybe it's just me, since what I love the most about tragedies is the energy/passion in the text, and the musicality of the characters-chorus interaction.

Thanks for the comments and discussion!




I've really enjoyed his books. He's a chip off the old block, that's for sure.




You are absolutely correct that I need a kilometric reference for these conversations, lol.
this conversation has reminded me that I can't read Shakespeare (plays or sonnets) and enjoy them at all without a version that has extensive notes and background. I just get nothing at all out of it. Nor can I watch a theatrical presentation and enjoy it if it's not a play I've read/studied. Others get the jokes, etc. even if they don't understand everything. I' not certain if it's my OCD or denseness that is to blame, but there it is. So I fully understand the desire to read classics the best, most informative way.

That sentiment is expressed by several reviewers and still gets a high rating. I like strange, so I'm intrigued. I'm just hoping it's bookish enough that I can use it for the books about books task in the geocache.


I haven't started the Inspector Banks novels yet, but I really enjoy the tv series by the BBC. You guys get that over there?

Brother
A Certain Slant of Light
Harold and Maude
Shadowshift


That's an awesome savings, Sarah!


I went to look see and discovered that it's on my wishlist.

This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Snowblind (other topics)The Monarch of the Glen (other topics)
Black Dog (other topics)
All the Birds in the Sky (other topics)
The Problem with Forever (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Yasushi Inoue (other topics)John Enright (other topics)
David Grossman (other topics)
Batya Gur (other topics)
Sharon Kay Penman (other topics)
More...
Some tragedies by Euripides
Indignation
Rising Sun
Foucalt's Pendulum