Mystery/Thriller Reading Friends discussion
Group Read Books - archive
>
Group Read - After the Crash Final comments spoilers welcome
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Ann
(new)
Jan 23, 2016 12:16AM

reply
|
flag

I also wondered what significance the singled out flight attendant in the crash description might mean. There were a lot of red herrings throughout the book so that was always a question about the details we learned.
I now think the flight attendant's injuries were meant to show how unlikely a baby could survive the crash unharmed. The entire crash prelude also introduced an anonymous mother with long hair and the strength of ego to defy the flight attendant's instructions to stay seated, a mother with long hair we could later use as a clue that would lead us to Lylie's identity as either Emilie or Lyse-Rose. That was what I initially thought the flight attendant's role was. ;)
I think I'll comment on your point about the flight attendant in a later segment. I haven't finished the book yet but as I am about half way I don't want my current thoughts to cloud this segment :)
Russ wrote: "I agree the prologue was a good tease to keep reading more. I wasn't sure why it focused so much on one flight attendant though.."

I also wondered what significance the singled out flight attendant in the crash description might mean. There were a lot of red herrings throughout the book so that was always a question about the details we learned."
Agreed. I liked the red herrings and misdirection for the most part, especially in the beginning and the middle of the book. It kept me guessing and wondering what really happened. But after a while all the dead ends and forced delays in revealing information (such as delaying when the reader finds out the DNA test results) started to get a bit tedious for me. About three-fourths of the way through I just wanted it all to end. Not that it was too long or boring, but because I became tired of being jerked around by the secrecy and misdirection.
Ultimately I was also annoyed by the introduction of Melanie at the end. We could not reasonably have guessed her existence. I wish there had been a way to make the fireman pictured in the newspaper the father of the baby. Then I could have slapped my forehead and said, "Of course--I should have known!" But there was no way to know about Melanie.

Russ wrote: "Agreed. I liked the red herrings and misdirection for the most part, especially in the beginning and the middle of the book. It kept me guessing and wondering what really happened. But after a while all the dead ends and forced delays in revealing information (such as delaying when the reader finds out the DNA test results) started to get a bit tedious for me. About three-fourths of the way through I just wanted it all to end. Not that it was too long or boring, but because I became tired of being jerked around by the secrecy and misdirection."

I partially forgave that veering to a conclusion for two reasons, it made sense and was a reasonable event and the initial introduction and segments with Grand-Duc alluded to a completely fruitless search for 18 years, that implied all of the clues would lead nowhere - except that he was writing the journal in place of all of his research documentation which he was destroying, so new clues could have been included.
Russ wrote: "Ultimately I was also annoyed by the introduction of Melanie at the end. We could not reasonably have guessed her existence. I wish there had been a way to make the fireman pictured in the newspaper the father of the baby. Then I could have slapped my forehead and said, "Of course--I should have known!" But there was no way to know about Melanie. "

Although I'm surprised it took grand duc 18 years to look into that conclusion and after the dna results he should have put ads in papers asking about it given the lengths he went to in his earlier investigation.
Even though it was tedious in parts I thought the way it came together was great and made it worth the journey.

Jack wrote: "I'm surprised it took grand duc 18 years to look into that conclusion and after the dna results he should have put ads in papers asking about it given the lengths he went to in his earlier investigation.
Even though it was tedious in parts I thought the way it came together was great..."


