Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion
Author Resource Round Table
>
Kirkus Review
date
newest »






Personally I don't want to fork out that much for a single review. But I'm not judging those who do. I understand the appeal. And I possibly would be tempted if I had more cash.
Tia; I'd hit 'publish'. You've paid through the nose, so you may as well use it as best you can. And yes, feel free to use the nice bits as promo quotes. And take the rest as advisory notices how to improve your next one.
xx



They work very hard at being 'impartial,' but it is still a paid review. So it is a delicate balance between being so negative no indie will buy another ad, and being so positive people think they've been bought. A different version of 'an honest opinion,' by 'professionals,' to inform the reader.
It's the same as it's always been: the big publishers paid for ad space in newspapers, and the papers encouraged the big publishers with nice reviews. Now indies can also pay for the privilege. Ad money runs the business world, but the public doesn't know all the details, and so thinks there is no collusion behind the scenes.
I don't trust the reviews any more: how do reviewers choose which books to review when there is such limited space?


Kirkus is a paid review site. It is open to anyone and they ensure that the review is honest. I'm sure a bad review that cost money would leave many Indie authors upset and needing to blame someone or something, since it couldn't possibly be their book.
Your accusations and opinions are harsh and without basis. I must admit I'm tired of hearing about the poor treatment of Indie Authors. The literary arena hasn't changed. Most writers and readers understand the use of commercial reviews by publishers to promote their business. They have spent time and money building up that business. Indies authors, most unwilling or unable to invest in their own book, seem to think they are somehow entitled to the same status.
If you wish to discredit Kirkus, you should have sufficient facts, rather than innuendos and opinions as foundation for your comments.
You said: "I don't trust the reviews any more: how do reviewers choose which books to review when there is such limited space?" Not trusting reviewers who have a solid track record is insulting. Reviews are for readers to determine if they want to invest in a book. They have the choice of reading the reviews and making a decision, or ignoring them.


Try doing a search of "Is Kirkus a scam" on Google. I think you'll be surprised.
In any case, people are entitled to their opinions. That includes $475 ones from Kirkus.

Indies pay over $400 for a review that appears on the Kirkus website and that's it.
Trad published books are reviewed free of charge and the reviews appear in the Kirkus magazine that goes to libraries.

As I mentioned in my original post, this wasn't published as is. It was published through an independent publisher and went through 3 rounds of professional editing. You've made an assumption without reading the OP.
I never said the review is a surprise. Everyone hopes for the best and I actually consider it a positive. There are positives I can use from it and critiques I can use also. They only had one issue with it so I consider myself lucky.
Thanks to everyone, interesting discussion! I'll certainly be using the positive lines for my editorial review section on Amazon. They certainly are a harsh critic, I was reading the review Kirkus gave 'Eat, Pray, Love'. They absolutely panned it. I bet Elizabeth Gilbert was crying when she read it, considering that it was made into a movie and Julia Roberts played her in it!

They work very hard at being 'impartial,' ..."
Hello Alicia
The conventional wisdom states never pay for a review. This is what I do. First I post a mock review on my website. Something like this writer is a genius. Or this is the funniest book ever written in the English language. I sign it Mrs Kirkus of Chestnut Avenue wonderland. The second thing I do is to get free reviews from serious book lovers. See the internet for lists. Good luck. Alan

Plus, if you already have a couple of positive reviews, the negative one will actually boost their credibility and probably your sales as well :)

Much harder than you think; most of those lists either lead nowhere, or to reviewers with a huge stack of books to be reviewed already in their queue.
It is a slow process unless you are good at marketing yourself.


Good points, Jim.
And that review of the sample will not tell you whether the writer can keep it up after a good start - and lead to a satisfying conclusion.
I check the reviews for what the sample can't show me: whether the writer can plot and finish a story.
I've had too many misses in that department - and they are infuriating - to not at least check the reviews to see if that's a common complaint.
The best compliment a reviewer has given me was to say that my last chapter was the best.


A suggestion: People don't like clicking through to Amazon, and then scrolling, and then having to click more just to get to the text. Each step loses you some people who won't bother.
If you have the rights (ie, self-publishing) or your traditional publisher will allow, put up a sample on your book's page here on Goodreads, and it will be much easier for people to at least read a few pages.
Another suggestion: putting up the whole or part on Wattpad or similar (for free), where you may be able to get people to read and vote and, if you're lucky, leave comments. It worked well for me.
Last point: it's not the price, necessarily, but taking a chance with time on an unknown writer. Time is the last great currency: we never have enough. I get unhappy when someone wastes mine.
I did check out your page; I think you need to connect the reader with WHY they should care about THIS boy. The description you have just discusses the story elements. It didn't connect with my emotions. Living a life vicariously, via emotions elicited in readers via the boy and his circumstances, is what makes people read fiction.
Good luck.

Jamaluddin,
The answer to your question is a resounding "No!" Very few avid readers ever bother to post a consumer review for any book they have read - good, bad or indifferent. They just don't feel the need. Since a consumer review is merely a personal opinion and, therefore, subjective, the impact upon sales is debatable.
Invest your time and energy in pursuing all available marketing opportunities: Author's website, self-promotion and interaction within literary websites, interviews, blogging, personal appearances, book signings, etc.
Even the best efforts may not deliver the desired results. Very few published authors ever become commercially successful. However, that is not to say that you may not eventually become one of them.
I wish you success.


I have "Readers Favorite" on my list of prospective reviewers. Thanks to your recommendation, it will move to the top of that list. Wishing you much success too!
Eva


Thanks from me too. I've submitted my recent publication to 'Readers Favorite', a book site I didn't know about before you mentioned it. Best of luck,
Julie



There are accusations around that the awards and seals are vanity awards, the contests are expensive and worthless, and there is a possibility of your work being pirated.
Check out these sites (there are more) for more information, before you make your decision.
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
http://accrispin.blogspot.ca/2012/03/...


My book did receive 4 out of 4 stars on ONLINE BOOK CLUB which I highly recommend because of the ''checks and balances' that they have in place for reviews. They also publish who reviewed your work whereas some do not (indie reader for example) - hence, those folks can pretty much say what they want and remain in anonymity. Readers Favorite also seems like a good choice for reviews, - if your book gets chosen.

Whatever your Kirkus review, you will probably find something you can quote on your book's page, and pieces you can use for advertising.
You must have believed enough in the book to pay for the editorial review - don't ruin your month until you see what they say AND let it percolate. Best of success with it.

Ann, this thread is five years old. Kirkus does have a reputation for being harsh. But they get 8,000-10,000 book submissions a year for review. So some are just going to not get good reviews. And Kirkus has gone through some changes as the market has changed in favour of Indie publishers as well. Not fully there yet for indies but getting better. I also am submitted to Kirkus. (me biting nails). But I also submitted to IndieReader and received a 5/5 with a fantastic review write up to use for marketing. I've read amny IndieReader reviews first, and they give out honest reviews and that is why I chose them.

Gabrielle
I now have the Kirkus review and I am in two minds about what to do with it. It is negative but there are some positive aspects. Considering the reputation Kirkus has for harsh reviews, I am not disappointed with it. I know I can’t really use it for promotion but there are a few sentences in there I could use, but I can’t unless I press the magic publish button which makes the review available in full. If Kirkus were using a star rating, I am guessing from the content and comments it would be a 2/5-3/5. Bad but with some positive aspects.
I know a bad review can be publicity also but I’m just an unknown author trying to get my work out there. I don’t regret it per se, just the expense of it really but there are some great critiques there too that I would certainly use for a second edition and to guide my future writing. So not a bad outcome but not an outcome I feel I can use in full for marketing.
Any thoughts or experiences?