EVERYONE Has Read This but Me - The Catch-Up Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Romeo and Juliet
CLASSICS READS
>
Romeo and Juliet Discussion - pre-read
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kaseadillla
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
May 04, 2016 09:19AM

reply
|
flag

Will definitely appreciate the commentary from an expert like yourself! Can you believe I never read this in high school?!? It seems absurd.

I didn't care for it when we read it and by the end I was ready to scream if I was forced to watch/see/look at/etc one more incarnation of it.


Perhaps I was the only one who loved it in my 9th grade class, based on reactions. However, that changed. High school girls begged teachers to put it on their book lists, especially 10th graders.
This is the movie version which had my friends and me full of tears:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo...
Boys were incredibly abusive about it all, though. Are they still?
Because of how beautiful the language was, I went on to other Shakespeare plays. I think 'Romeo and Juliet' is the perfect choice for the first Shakespeare play, but they all are amazing.

Yes, boys can still be quite critical (and some girls too). If you read it too young, before love is part of your life, the play can seem irrelevant. Here some not love based themes this story connects too.
-What makes a good parent? Romeo's let him wander around town, stay in bed all day, and pretty much do what ever he wants. Juliet's parents don't let her do ANYTHING without permission, including go to church for confession. Is there parents actions that prompts the bad decisions they make?
-How far would you go for your best friend? (view spoiler)

message 9:
by
aPriL does feral sometimes
(last edited May 12, 2016 11:02PM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars

I think if you see the right movie with the right actors, and thrilling music, it will hit home. The words on the page are lovely to those who love poetry and poetic words, but I noticed for most moderns (me, too), it makes more of a difference if they see the action, if they have music, and the actors are pretty and charismatic. This is why I began to check out videos of the plays actually being acted out - later I looked up stuff, read the plays.
I think I read in play notes the real Romeo and Juliet, or rich kids like them, or whatever bits of a story Shakespeare heard and then transformed, who would have lived in the 14th or 15th century (maybe earlier? Memory fails), were usually 15 and 13 years of age respectively.
I think in some Middle-age fact book I read the average age of people was 19, and most were old, toothless and dead by 40. What that means if you think about it, since people haven't changed their biology, most people we consider YA or teens were considered adults running businesses, plantations, etc. but had all of those teen hormones at the same time. I think that is why all of the sword fights and duels, the races and gambling and whoring, which were commonplace for 'old' married men and fathers who were actually 19-30 years old..

That makes sense, the age, life expectancy and all that. As far as the old men thing. If it started then when it made sense due to age and life expectancy, men sure did milk the hell out of it, didn't they since its still going on now.
I feel though that the perception of it being a given is getting chipped away at just a bit though now. But maybe that's just me thinking too positively and of course when I say that I'm only talking about in the US. I'm not sure how to is for women in other places living under this "given" behavior for males.

I went through the same process, except we didn't watch the play, we acted one out. I get that we should analyse all aspects of it in school but it was too much that we started to dislike it.
message 12:
by
aPriL does feral sometimes
(last edited May 16, 2016 01:01PM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars

; P
message 13:
by
aPriL does feral sometimes
(last edited May 16, 2016 01:06PM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars


Since there weren't enough characters for all of us we were divided in groups so that everyone can get a part. We had each group act a few scenes and put it all together. So yes I did have a part, I played Tybalt. It was interesting to see several interpretations of the same characters.
I only acted out one play in my entire grade school career - I was Ms. Frizzle of the Magic School Bus in 2nd grade. Yikes.
As for seeing the play acted versus being read, I totally agree that seeing the play probably has a lot more power than reading it, especially during the love/action scenes. Reading it felt rushed and, therefore, made it seem... I don't know, silly? Unbelievable? I found myself purposefully reading slow in those parts in order to try and imagine better what it would actually be like to see it.
As for seeing the play acted versus being read, I totally agree that seeing the play probably has a lot more power than reading it, especially during the love/action scenes. Reading it felt rushed and, therefore, made it seem... I don't know, silly? Unbelievable? I found myself purposefully reading slow in those parts in order to try and imagine better what it would actually be like to see it.


We had to do that with a fairly long scene from A Midsummer Night's Dream. I nailed it, but had a hard time not laughing. I talk with my hands (my grandma's parents were both in Italy, therefore its genetic and I can't help it!) and this particular teacher knew it very well. She said she was actually looking forward to it. I pretty much had my hands going in iambic pentameter and both my teacher and I struggled to keep a straight face.