Reading 1001 discussion

10 views
Archives > Q7) Ending

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

In what ways might the final words of the novel, "For Reason must prevail," be interpreted? What do you think Zamiatin's intention is? How do you choose to interpret it?


message 2: by Patrick (new)

Patrick Robitaille | 1603 comments Mod
It has a double meaning, and I am confident that Zamyatin chose this ambiguous sentence as a means to try to make his novel more acceptable to the Soviet authorities, while at the same time offering veiled criticism of the communist ideology. Reason must prevail in a world where rationalism and mathematical organisation are pushed to the extreme on the promise of eternal "happiness"; however, reason (maybe as common sense or the application of reason in a more humane way) must prevail against hyper-rationalism as it cannot lead to eternal happiness. That would be a direct warning that communism (and its development) is doomed to fail.


message 3: by John (new)

John Seymour I agree with Patrick. Also, perhaps, as a note of hope in a seemingly grim world, with a direct application to events in the Soviet Union?


back to top