Reading 1001 discussion
Archives
>
Q7) Ending
date
newest »

message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Nov 28, 2016 11:54AM
In what ways might the final words of the novel, "For Reason must prevail," be interpreted? What do you think Zamiatin's intention is? How do you choose to interpret it?
reply
|
flag
It has a double meaning, and I am confident that Zamyatin chose this ambiguous sentence as a means to try to make his novel more acceptable to the Soviet authorities, while at the same time offering veiled criticism of the communist ideology. Reason must prevail in a world where rationalism and mathematical organisation are pushed to the extreme on the promise of eternal "happiness"; however, reason (maybe as common sense or the application of reason in a more humane way) must prevail against hyper-rationalism as it cannot lead to eternal happiness. That would be a direct warning that communism (and its development) is doomed to fail.