The Next Best Book Club discussion
Group Read Discussions
>
The Rosie Project
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lori, Super Mod
(new)
May 31, 2014 05:12PM

reply
|
flag




I did vote for The Rosie Project to be our group read, because I just happened to have the book in my to-read pile (which is a lot like the Eiffel Tower, both in shape and size by now) and I needed a good reason to finally dig in for something lower in the structure, not just the first one from the top, as I usually do.
I must say, I was not disappointed. It was a quick and funny read.
I agree wholeheartedly with the “voice” comments before me. I have a feeling that Don wouldn't have been quite as likeable and easy to identify with, if he were described from the outside. I don’t think I would have kept on reading, if the book wasn’t narrated by the main hero. It's just very hard to understand characters who are so different from you, when you don't have this intimate insight into their thoughts. I think that the author did a tremendous job here.
I’m really happy I read The Rosie Project. Seems like even the genres you don't usually go for, can still have something in store for you, if you give them a chance.



Lorraine wrote: "I enjoyed this book. I found Don's reasoning about having 7 different dinners planned each week rather interesting, but I'm not that disciplined!"
Lorraine, I see that you nominated this book. The group rules for nominating a book here state that if your book wins, you lead the discussion for the month.
I couldn't message you because you have that option blocked.
Would you please take on the task of leading the group through specific points within the book?
Lorraine, I see that you nominated this book. The group rules for nominating a book here state that if your book wins, you lead the discussion for the month.
I couldn't message you because you have that option blocked.
Would you please take on the task of leading the group through specific points within the book?

1) Reprimanding the people who finished the book before June even started. Bad people. Bad! Now roll up some newspaper and whack yourself on the nose; and
2) Apologizing in advance for comments way behind the discussion and possibly repeating anything super witty someone else has already posted. I swear I thought the same thing. Honest.

I've worked as secretary to a group of physicists, some of whom were similar to our lead character Don. Their work was their great passion and they could discuss science morning, noon and night. But none had Asperger's. Don was a lonely character but didn't know it.
As I commented above I liked Don's reasoning about having 7 different meals planned out for dinner each week as it was efficient to shop for and made meal prep a snap.
Some of the funniest parts were when Don mentioned things like his best friend wanting to sleep with women from all different countries in the world, and Rosie's comments on his clothes. The scene in the restaurant about Don needing to wear a jacket was fun, as Don tried to reason with the staff member that his gore-tex jacket was superior in every way to a sports jacket.
I've read several books set in Australia recently, but still find it a little disorienting to read things like "it was a warm January day".
What comments do other readers want to make?



Also, I think that although Don seemed intolerable at times due to to his inflexibility, he was still able to laugh at himself (and forgive himself), which seemed to be key. He still came across as a genuinely kind individual which made him attractive. He could have been inflexible AND a jerk. Don was probably an easy target for bullying when he was a kid, which is a shame. Will Don and Rosie make for a beautiful, fulfilling marriage long term? I am not sure? Anyone else?

They are both loyal and intrinsically kind. I think they will be careful enough with each other and their feelings that arguments or disagreements can be bridged.
They are also opposite enough (duh!) to keep things interesting and fun which seems to be a huge part of any successful relationship. They may value very different things in everyday life, but their values themselves are in line.

Me too! I think this is the second or third book I've read this year that's set in Australia. I, too, find it disconcerting when I read something where the seasons are flipped!
Interestingly enough, I just met a few Australians last week. While I didn't ask if they'd read the book, it crossed my mind!

"It was obvious that Rosie was confused by emotions, and I respected her attempt to overcome them."
Me too.
With respect to the book overall, so far so good. It's fantastic seeing things through Don's eyes.


I originally read this because it was a "Deal of the Day" for Nook on Barnes & Nobel's website. I hadn't read any reviews or heard anything about it. Only after I started reading and added it to my updates did I begin to see anything about it.


Not on subject but like others I find that it is also the third book set in Australia that I have read recently.
Great book choice. I look forward to the next decision making process.

Not on subject but like others I find that it is also the third book se..."
It's the 2nd book set in Australia for me recently. The other one was "The Light Between Oceans" that was not at all like TRP.


I really enjoy it.



That's not to say I would have wanted to be Gene's France or whatever!


One of my favorite insights is that we apparently can have open marriages as long as we don't embarrass our wives. Thanks France!!!
I'm gonna post a regular (roughly 500 word) review as well, so check it out if you like.
With respect to the recent Gene conversation, he was a loveable sleezeball at first, then a suspect sleezeball, then a contentious yet enlightening sleezeball before finally becoming a reformed sleezeball/dedicated husband. So mainly good guy, I think.

On the question of Gene, I don't think he was necessarily a bad guy. I liked him in the book, and groaned at the many times Don matter-of-fact statements reminded Gene's wife of their open relationship. I think Gene just needed a wake up call, which he got, that his lifestyle may not be appropriate anymore. And I don't think Gene used Don, just saw an opportunity to use his information from the Wife Project to add more pins to his map. He genuinely tried to help Don I think, albeit a little misguided due to his own issues.
What I also enjoyed was reading it from Don's perspective, but being obviously aware of other people's responses and what they meant even though Don was completely oblivious. I would have loved for him to revisit some of his social faux pas like when he told Rosie he didn't notice whether she was attractive, but that probably would have been out of character and I was pushing for them to realise they needed to be together too early in the book.
Great recommendation! It's the first book I've read for the group read being a new member of this group. Thanks

