Horror Aficionados discussion
Main Character Death
date
newest »




However, I have also read horror novels where the main characters were so irritating that it was a relief when they died........


Cruel, cruel! ^_-
I'm usually not bothered by character deaths, but Hunter Shea's The Montauk Monster had a couple that were very heavy stuff.



The later is something that has happened throughout our literary history. (spoiler alert) Hamlet dies at the end of Shakespeare's play. If done right, killing off the main character can be appropriate, but if it's gratuitous, than it's no different than any other gratuitous element a writer throws in.


Spot on.

Give me a deeply moving, trenchantly beautiful tragedy any day.

(That doesn't mean I don't hate the idea I see sometimes that a story is somehow "better" because the main character(s) dies.)
The important thing - that not all authors get right - is that if a main character dies, it should happen organically as part of the story. Sometimes, you see deaths that just sort of feel forced, like the author is trying to be "shocking" or "edgy" or whatever. I think most readers pick up on it when that happens, and it just about ruins the story for me.
So yeah, death of a main character is fine if it's handled right - if not it can spoil the whole thing.

I was wondering what my fellow HA members think of reading horror novels where the main character or characters die. Most of the time I get involved and attached to the character or characters and then at the end the author throws the reader for a loop and the characters that I became attached to have died.
What are your thoughts on this subject?