The Sword and Laser discussion

This topic is about
Steven Erikson
What Else Are You Reading?
>
Should I finish reading Malazan Book Of The Fallen?
date
newest »


I read the series about 2 years ago and I would read 1 Malazan book then something light afterward before moving on to the next Malazan novel. It helped me stay motivated and not get too dragged down in the darkness of the story.
Maybe take a break after TTH? Dust of Dreams and The Crippled God are one story split into two. The last 3 books were a slog for me as well but I'm glad I finished it and enjoyed the series as a whole.

I read the se..."
I'm 80% through Toll the Hounds so will likely finish that for sure. I've been listening to the Dresden Files as a lighter distraction...
Overall I've enjoyed all of the books though some have been a slog. My biggest problem is that I think he could have written the same story in about half the time, particularly Toll The Hounds! I just have this nagging feeling that if I get this far I'm going to be missing out on something.


I read all ten books of Amber as I got them in one book and they were very short. I would have stopped half way otherwise.
(the first books were great)


Why not just come back to it when you're ready? It's not like you need to binge read a series.

Maybe part of it is that now four books in I no longer feel like I'm trying to do calculus without any prior knowledge of math like I did in the early books which made no attempt to explain anything that was going on.

Why not just come back to it when you're re..."
Pretty much what I do. One Malazan book followed by a bunch of easier to read and follow stuff before diving back in again. Though with Malazan it does make things a bit hard to remember, I'd be hard pressed to tell you who did what and why in the third book at this point (too many characters doing too many things).


That's not necessarily a knock on the book or series, it just means that it's not for me.

Audible is how I'm doing it now. I actually physically read the first three books years ago but it took me forever because it was a chore and I found I was more lost reading than listening.
I agree the narrator is fine but I wish they were more obvious about scene changes. I can't even begin to count how many times I've been listening only to realize after a minute or two that the settings and characters have changed and I didn't realize it.

Malazan works for me, I do enjoy the characters and story. Its just that its soooooo much detail and depth. The first book literally just throws you into the middle of an ongoing saga with all new races, magic, gods, etc from typical fantasy which makes it hard to grasp early on.
Even four books on now (the first three of which I've read / listened to twice now) I'm still not sure I understand completely how magic works.

...just kidding. Life's too short to force yourself to read books you aren't into. I bounced off the first one myself.


Good analogy. Most of the way through the 4th book now I find myself at times wondering why I'm doing this while at the same time looking forward to in about 5 years doing the whole thing over again and truly getting it this time because knowing whats coming will make understanding whats currently happening so much easier.


On top of that, things like "...Erikson decided to have numerous major characters change their names along with adding yet more characters..." would make me throw the book at the wall. There's asking the reader to deal with a lot, then there's being a dick about it.
I wonder - some people love fantasy for what I think of as alternate world tourism, i.e. they love 'visiting' the world that the author has created and having plot progress is actually not as important to those folks. Is that part or much of the appeal of this series for those of you who like it?


All of that is (in my view of course) the author exercising his world-building skills at the reader's expense. Yeah, I get Erickson has this super deep history behind this fiction... but I don't really care except to the degree that it helps the story. To use a classic example, Tolkien had a very deep mythology and history behind LotR including a worked out language for elves but he used it judiciously in the books to hint at events of the past and give the world context. But Frodo didn't take on a new name in book 2 or start being called by some honorific later.
"There is a major new character in book four named Karsa Orlong who without warning sometimes starts being known as Toblekai..."
To me, unless the confusion on the part of the reader is outweighed by something else, that kind of thing simply isn't worth it. It's indulgent wallowing.

ps.
I'm not starting them now or I'd never finish my reading challenge!

And you can read the Wiki without fear of spoilers when you forget things.

Books mentioned in this topic
Gardens of the Moon (other topics)Deadhouse Gates (other topics)
Dust of Dreams (other topics)
The Crippled God (other topics)
I've thought about taking a break and reading something else but the books are so dense I know I'd forget a lot by the time I got back to it.
Is persevering for the last two books likely to be worth the payoff?