21st Century Literature discussion

This topic is about
How It All Began
2017 Book Discussions
>
How It All Began - Background Thread, No Spoilers (March 2017)
date
newest »

Thanks Casceil. I am reading this at the moment and will participate in the discussion. I have read several other Lively novels and she is obviously interested in causality - another of them, Making it Up, explored alternative directions her own life might have taken had certain events happened differently so this book is thematically similar. This might be a good place to put some links on chaos theory and the butterfly effect, which should be common knowledge by now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterf...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_t...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterf...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_t...
A few reviews (these may contain spoilers):
https://www.theguardian.com/books/201...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/bo...
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/boo...
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-ent...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entert...
https://www.theguardian.com/books/201...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/bo...
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/boo...
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-ent...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entert...
I hope you enjoy it, Kathleen. The discussion has gotten off to a slow start, but I figure many people are reading Noise of Time first. It's been a while since I first read How it all Began, and I am only about half way through my reread.

The butterfly effect illustrated in this book made me think of the Nationwide insurance TV commercials (probably only relatable for US readers) where small happenings lead to big accidents, all, of course, covered by Nationwide (which "is on your side").


That's two votes for something unrealistic about the dialogue between Rose and Anton. I agree there something a little off about it, but I'm not sure what. It did seem like at some point Anton's ability to express himself improved by leaps and bounds. Can anyone else put their finger or what it is about the dialogue that seems off?

Still, I'm enjoying Rose and Anton and all the others. Will be done soon, and think I'll miss them!

Nicole, I think you are right that we learn less about Anton than others. That may be partly related to the fact that the others are in recognizable situations we have preconceptions about (stodgy old retired professor, couple getting a divorce), while Anton is outside our norm.

One theme of the book is the large effects coincidence may have on our lives. We meet a cast of characters whose lives are all affected when Charlotte is mugged and breaks her hip. Some of those affected do not know Charlotte, or even know that she exists.
Another theme is how we change over time and are changed by what happens in our lives. "Charlotte views her younger selves with detachment. They are herselves, but other incarnations, innocents going about half-forgotten business. One is not nostalgic about them -- dear me, no. Though occasionally a trifle envious; physically spry, pretty sharp teacher, though I say it myself, all my lot got A's at A level, no question." Paperback edition, pp. 7-8.
Penelope Lively has an interesting prose style. She uses sentence fragments to convey how a character thinks. It's a little like stream of consciousness, but much easier to follow, I think.
Use this thread to post any general thoughts about the book, the characters or the author's style.