World, Writing, Wealth discussion
Book and Film Discussions
>
Whom do you consider well-read?
date
newest »



That's some definition!
And btw, what's defining of previous/our/younger generation? Harry Potter and 50 shades/cent?


Hard to tell today.. In pre-internet era and prior to hundreds of TV channels, books were one the major sources of knowledge and well-read dudes stood out. Nowadays the importance of reading for broadening one's horizons has downgraded, in my opinion..


Quantitatively speaking, I think someone with 100+ books in at least a few areas, can't probably be called a poorly-read, so by default that makes him/her medium-rare/well-read -:)
I'd rather talk to a reader, because I'm a very modest TV-watcher and thus would strike as a narrow-sighted, poorly TV educated dude:
- Nik, have you seen Game of Thrones?
- No
- Bay Watch?
- No
- Any series?
- No
And so on -:)



Would have no idea what she's talking about, but might offer her a drink anyway -:)

That's the spirit!

So back to the original question! :)
To me the definition of "well-read" would be anyone that has read thousands of books in their lifetime including almost all the classics. Not sure if there is someone on this site that is close to my idea of a well-read person.
I know there are people on this site that have probably read thousands of books, but have they read the classics as well? Might be an interesting search to find out, but I would not know how to go about finding that answer on here. :)

Anyway, an attempt to a definition of a well-read person: A person who reads broadly, accross historical times, cultures, and genres. I guess you can make a distinction about a person who reads a lot of the same stuff, and a person who has breadth as well as depth, and is therefore, well-read.

Thousands & most classics? That's a high bar and in my gradation would be an extraordinary well-read even :)

Anyway, an attempt..."
I am sorry Roxanna for not clarifying "classics". I probably should have gave examples. Classics to me are like Mark Twain, Shakespear, Hamlet, etc. Though for me, I have not read them. But classics could mean different things to different people within different genres too. :)


When I was 20 to 30, that would have applied to me, for my generation. But, since then I stopped reading the equivalent of Dickens and Twain, ignored the Best Sellers list for new books, and read legal fiction and science fiction (and of course case law and legal books for my job). In the last 10 years, I have pretty much read mostly science fiction.
When I was reading hard copy books, I knew the authors and titles. With the e-reader and so many books, I don't, unless it is something I specifically want to remember. That doesn't mean I don't know the contents or meaning of what I am reading.
Since being disabled, I have read over 1,500 books. That doesn't make me well-read; just someone who reads a lot.
So, who's well-read for you?
A person that reads at least a few books a year? Has read over 100-200? Who quotes Shakes or multiple authors frequently? Knowledgeable in many areas, referring to the books s/he's read? Someone who has read your book, if you are an author? -:)
How do you see it?