Clean Reads discussion
What's your threshold?
date
newest »




I do think that fantasy as a whole is an inherently violent genre, because it focuses on conflicts that don't lend themselves well to peaceful resolution. In Violet Skies for example, the villains are pretty vile. Der'aevis, Arvis and Dibian cannot be negotiated with and their actions place them well past the "Moral Event Horizon". Alex and Brand eventually face up to their sins and pay for them. They are redeemed in the end, but the villains are not.
That said, Brand is a soldier, and soldiers kill. It's just a part of his life. He doesn't enjoy it, but he does his job, and well.
With one exception, being a lapse of judgement caused by a villain, all the violence in the series is either done by the villains or to stop them.
There is foul language, but the text is not littered with it, and it makes sense in context. Taya, the protagonist, never swears but once in the entire series, and considering the circumstances it totally makes sense.
As for sex, it's there, but it's pretty much in the background and back story. There's dancing, touching, kissing, but the only thing at all graphic is in the climax of the second book, and I will probably tone that down in later drafts. (Book 2 is still in early drafts. I hope to publish in September.) For what it's worth, sex is never depicted as being free of consequences, quite the opposite.



I agree completely both for what I read and how I encourage my 6 children to choose their books.

I do think that fantasy as a whole is an inherently violent genre, because it foc..."
I read your post and thought, "ooh, I'd love to read and review a copy" until you said that there's a sex scene in the climax. Big turnoff for me. So I'm glad to hear you're planning on toning it down. Personally, I think that a sign of a good author is when they create as much or more romantic tension in a single kiss than in a bedroom scene. And if the book plot deals with the consequences, we readers are smart. We can read between the lines and don't need the whole scene spelled out for us. As a new member of this clean reads group, that's my two cents. :) Also, I'm much more picky about sexual content than violence, though I don't appreciate a lot of gore. Killing/fighting is one thing but I don't need to hear about blood and guts.


Sex and Violence I view the same- most good stories will have romance and fighting somewhere but I do not need a play by play of what is going on- most readers have good imaginations and can figure things out on their own without having to be told where his hand was, her mouth was or the detail of every wound in a fight.
A good story should have strong dialogue, characters and a story, having to add in a lot of cursing/language and graphic violence shows a lack of creativity to me.


Also, for me, predictability... ugh. I hate it when I read the back of the book and know exactly what's going to happen (like when I saw the commercial for a Walk to Remember and looked around saying, "You know she's going to die, right?" even though I had never read the book or seen the movie).
I can handle SOME violence. I don't know. Pretty much PG-13 is my cap. I've never watched a rated R movie and I've noticed that I remember a lot more about what I read than watch. I've still never seen the Notebook because the book scarred me.
One more thing, and this is kind of strange, but if it's fantasy, I NEED to be able to visualize it. I loved that Harry Potter was in a human world that I could relate to. HATED that Wrinkle in Time was all the different planets with aliens that I had nothing to compare it to. Also, if you're going to talk directions, PLEASE include a map. I need it.

I will have a hard to with any book, clean or not, that has poor characterization, plot, etc. For example, I had to put down Prophet by Larson not because it was a dirty novel, but because it was a poorly executed story. You can read my review on it to get more of an idea on what I mean.
What I'm wondering now is this: What exactly turns you off of books and how much of that can you tolerate? I realize this has been covered somewhat in other threads, but here I'm talking not about specific books but in the abstract and in general.
I also realize that this is indeed subjective. You all have different standards, ranging from zero tolerance to fairly high. You might consider context, whether in the scene or the work as a whole. You might tolerate more violence or language in a well-written book in which it makes sense and isn't constant or gratuitous. You might have a higher tolerance for violence than sex, or vice versa. All this and more is quite possible.
As an author, a media content provider, I'm just curious to see what you all (a good chunk of my target audience) have to say.
Thanks.